directly | Like Promise.all, only less so | Reactive Programming library

I am using a script to recursively list all the files in a Google drive folder to a spreadsheet. It is working fine but i need to sort the file listing by size ( highest size on top ). Also drive api returns value of size in bytes but i need them in GB's . I haven't found any way to do it through api directly ,so i want to divide the size value of each file by 1073741824 upto 1 decimal rounding it off ( 1 GB = 1073741824 bytes )

I was making a simple to do app with mvc pattern and I saw an article which said you shouldn't pass the model values directly to the view, which made the project more complex than I thought (I am relatively new to programming and this is the first time I am trying out a design pattern).

But then later on I talked to someone who said that that is not true and you can send the model data directly to view, he didn't even use classes or some kind of grouping to separate the function he just put them in separate files.

I was wondering if there is a guideline that I couldn't find or we can do whatever we want as long as they are kind of separated. I would love an article or a guide to read up on as well.

I'm implementing Testing Library with Puppeteer and I was trying to use an environment variable, DEBUG_PRINT_LIMIT, to limit the length of the HTML printed to console in case of failure.

But for some reasons, the variable environment is just ignored by the library...

My project:

package.json

I am currently trying to build OpenPose. First, I will try to describe the environment and then the error emerging from it. Caffe, being built from source, resides in its entirety in [/Users...]/openpose/3rdparty instead of the usual location (I redact some parts of the filepaths in this post for privacy). All of its include files can be found in [/Users...]/openpose/3rdparty/caffe/include/caffe. After entering this command:

I read this answer, which clarified a lot of things, but I'm still confused about how I should go about designing my primary key.

First off I want to clarify the idea of WCUs. I get that WCU is the write capacity of max 1kb per second. Does it mean that if writing a piece of data takes 0.25 seconds, I would need 4 of those to be billed 1 WCU? Or each time I write something it consumes 1 WCU, but I could also write X times within 1 second and still be billed 1 WCU?

Usage

I want to create a table that stores the form data for a set of gyms (95% will be waivers, the rest will be incidents reports). Most of the time, each forms will be accessed directly via its unique ID. I also want to query the forms by date, form, userId, etc..

We can assume an average of 50k forms per gym

Options

• First option is straight forward: having the formId be the partition key. What I don't like about this option is that scan operations will always filter out 90% of the data (i.e. the forms from other gyms), which isn't good for RCUs.

• Second option is that I would make the gymId the partition key, and add a sort key for the date, formId, userId. To implement this option I would need to know more about the implications of having 50k records on one partition key.

• Third option is to have one table per gyms and have the formId as partition key. This seems to be like the best option for now, but I don't really like the idea of having a a large number of tables doing the same thing in my account.

Is there another option? Which one of the three is better?

Edit: I'm assuming another option would be SimpleDB?

How do I get the object type so I can directly cast to it? This is the ideal method I would like to execute:

I have a WPF app, linked to a SQL-server. I am using the MVVM-light package (I do actually have Prism.Core installed, but I'm not sure if I'm using it or not.... new to MVVM).

There's a DataGrid, bound to an ObservableCollection. I have been trying to implement the PropertyChangedEventHandler, but I can't seem to get it to work.

I have a Delete button bound, and I am able to remove rows, but when I re-open the form, the changes does not carry over.

I tried to change the binding-mode for the DataGrid from OneWay to TwoWay. With OneWay, the changes does not carry over when I re-open the form. With TwoWay, I get this error message when opening the child form (which contains the DataGrid):

System.InvalidOperationException: 'A TwoWay or OneWayToSource binding cannot work on the read->only property 'licenseHolders' of type 'Ridel.Hub.ViewModel.LicenseHoldersViewModel'.'

So, If I then add a set; to my public ObservableCollection licenseHolders { get; }, the program runs, but the previous problem persists, like it did when there was a OneWay mode configuration on the DataGrid.

What do I need to do to get this to work without communicating directly with the Sql-server, which would defy the whole point of using this methodology in the first place?

I'm struggling to use the Micronaut HTTPClient for multiple calls to a third-party REST service without receiving a io.micronaut.http.client.exceptions.ReadTimeoutException

To remove the third-party dependency, the problem can be reproduced using a simple Micronaut app calling it's own service.

Example Controller:

I'm learning Vue 3 with Vuex 4 and I'm stucked with something that I'm pretty sure it's simple but I can't see.

In few words, i'm trying to set some data in state to have it available to use it in my components but it isn't working.

Let me show you the code:

/// store.js