lyz | LyZ is a plugin for Zotero , which is intended to make | Development Tools library
kandi X-RAY | lyz Summary
kandi X-RAY | lyz Summary
LyZ is a plugin for Zotero, which is intended to make working with LyX/Zotero more pleasant. The latest source code is available at GitHub. The latest stable release is available from the GitHub releases page.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Export into BEM .
- Process an item and add it to the item map .
- Get the value of a field .
- Creates a new record .
- the key mapping function
- Detect entry .
- Import a file .
- Writes field data to JSON .
- cleanup - sentences
- list event handler
lyz Key Features
lyz Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on lyz
QUESTION
I have the following case which I'm trying write an RDF/OWL rule for. The goal is to improve consistency checking in the resulting data base.
I have a class called "Expression" and a class called "Manifestation", they can be related by "hasManifestation".
It easy to enough to restrict the domain and range accordingly so that the domain of "hasManifestation" is "Expression" and the Range is "Manifestation".
But I want to go one step further.
Expressions and Manifestation have a property called structure level, level 1, 2, 3, 4
So an Expression at level 1 should always be related through "hasManifestation" to a "Manifestation" also at level 1, never at level 2, 3, etc.
Likewise an Expression at level 2 should always be related to a Manifestation at level 2 never at level 1 or 3, etc.
So I want write a rule for the Domain and Range of "hasManifestation" that goes something like the following:
Range: Y must be a Manifestation and if the value of the Domain is level Z, then Y must be level Z
Domain: X must be an Expression and if the value of the Range is level Z, then X is level X.
I think I can write this in predicate logic as follows: E = expression, M=manifestation, L=level, R=Range, D=Domain
Range: y(My and (xz)(Dx and Lxz) -> (Lyz))
Domain: x(Ex and (yz)(Ry and Lyz) -> (Lxz))
I might be messing that up somewhere, but hopefully you get the idea of what I would like to do. But how could I write this as an OWL statement in ttl.
Any advice is much appreciated.
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Apr-10 at 12:10You can use hasValue
restrictions to express this, but not at the domain and range level of the property - restricting it on the property requires a property for each level.
So, you could create a general concept inclusion axiom, along the lines of:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install lyz
Download the lyz .xpi file from the GitHub releases page.
Install LyZ in Zotero by selecting Add-ons from the Tools menu and then clicking the gear icon in the Add-ons window, selecting "Install add-on from file" and selecting the lyz .xpi file.
Open LyX and set LyXServer path (in LyX go to menu, Tools > Preferences... > Paths and set LyXServer pipe to): Windows users can use the default path setting in LyZ, i.e. \\.\pipe\lyxpipe. Linux and Mac users can use e.g. ~/.lyxpipe and change the LyZ settings accordingly.
By default all characters are escaped, e.g. š becomes \v{s}. Set extensions.lyz.use_utf8 to true in about:config to avoid escaping (in case you need to use non-latin scripts such as Chinese).
Open document in LyX.
Right click on link
Select 'Save Link As'
Select a folder to save in
Click 'Save'
The file will now download
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page