dynamoDB | Node JS module for accessing Amazon DynamoDB | Runtime Evironment library
kandi X-RAY | dynamoDB Summary
kandi X-RAY | dynamoDB Summary
DynamoDB uses JSON for communication. That means both the request body and the response are in JSON format. This module wraps up the request and takes care of authentication. The user will be responsible for crafting the request and consuming the result.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of dynamoDB
dynamoDB Key Features
dynamoDB Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on dynamoDB
QUESTION
I read this answer, which clarified a lot of things, but I'm still confused about how I should go about designing my primary key.
First off I want to clarify the idea of WCUs. I get that WCU is the write capacity of max 1kb per second. Does it mean that if writing a piece of data takes 0.25 seconds, I would need 4 of those to be billed 1 WCU? Or each time I write something it consumes 1 WCU, but I could also write X times within 1 second and still be billed 1 WCU?
Usage
I want to create a table that stores the form data for a set of gyms (95% will be waivers, the rest will be incidents reports). Most of the time, each forms will be accessed directly via its unique ID. I also want to query the forms by date, form, userId, etc..
We can assume an average of 50k forms per gym
Options
First option is straight forward: having the formId be the partition key. What I don't like about this option is that scan operations will always filter out 90% of the data (i.e. the forms from other gyms), which isn't good for RCUs.
Second option is that I would make the gymId the partition key, and add a sort key for the date, formId, userId. To implement this option I would need to know more about the implications of having 50k records on one partition key.
Third option is to have one table per gyms and have the formId as partition key. This seems to be like the best option for now, but I don't really like the idea of having a a large number of tables doing the same thing in my account.
Is there another option? Which one of the three is better?
Edit: I'm assuming another option would be SimpleDB?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-21 at 20:26For your PK design. What data does the app have when a user is going to look for a form? Does it have the GymID, userID, and formID? If so, make a compound key out of that for the PK perhaps? So your PK might look like:
QUESTION
I don't really know where the error is, for me, it's still a mystery. But I'm using Laravel 8 to produce a project, it was working perfectly and randomly started to return this error and all projects started to return this error too. I believe it's something with Redis, as I'm using it to store the system cache. When I go to access my endpoint in postman it returns the following error:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-12 at 01:50Your problem is that you have set SESSION_CONNECTION=session
, but your SESSION_DRIVER=default
, so you have to use SESSION_DRIVER=database
in your .env
. See the config/session.php
:
QUESTION
I have the following data stored in a DynamoDB table called elo-history
.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-13 at 15:03It looks like you're modeling the one-to-many relationship between Games and Results using a complex attribute (e.g. a list or objects) on the Game item. This is a completely valid approach to modeling one-to-many relationships and is best used when 1) the results data doesn't change (or change often) and 2) you don't have any access patterns around Results.
Since it sounds like you do have access patterns around Results, you'd be better off storing your Results in their own items.
For example, you might consider modeling results in the user partition with a PK=USER#user_id SK=RESULT#game_id. This would allow you to fetch results by User ID (QUERY where PK=USER#user_id SK begins_with RESULT). Alternatively, you could model results with a PK=RESULT#game_id SK=USER#user_id and create a GSI that swaps the PK/SK's which will allow you to group results by User.
I don't know the specifics around your access patterns, but can say that you'll need to move results into their own items if you want to support access patterns around game results.
QUESTION
I have about 200 records that I need to write frequently to DynamoDB and I'm trying to see if the BatchWriteItem saves any overhead in terms of WCU versus iterating PutItem 200 times. Other than the number of network requests sent, does BatchWriteItem lower the amount of WCU used?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-13 at 18:44Going with the WCU calculation guide here it looks like BatchWriteItem and PutItem both follows the same rounding off calculation for the size and will have same WCU consumed.
For PutItem, UpdateItem, and DeleteItem operations, DynamoDB rounds the item size up to the next 1 KB. For example, if you put or delete an item of 1.6 KB, DynamoDB rounds the item size up to 2 KB.
BatchWriteItem—Writes up to 25 items to one or more tables. DynamoDB processes each item in the batch as an individual PutItem or DeleteItem request (updates are not supported). So DynamoDB first rounds up the size of each item to the next 1 KB boundary, and then calculates the total size. The result is not necessarily the same as the total size of all the items. For example, if BatchWriteItem writes a 500-byte item and a 3.5 KB item, DynamoDB calculates the size as 5 KB (1 KB + 4 KB), not 4 KB (500 bytes + 3.5 KB).
QUESTION
I tried every possible solution on the internet with no hope
What I am trying to do is simply use aws lambda functions (through the aws console) to fetch user fcm token from lets say DynamoDB (not included in the question), use that token to create endpointArn, send push to that specific device
I tested to send Using SNS console and the push gets to the device successfully but I failed to get it to the device using Lambda functions although it gives success status and message ID
Here is the code I used
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-12 at 09:43After some trials and errors I figured out the solution for my own question
1- The GCM part of the payload should be a string not a json 2- The message parameter should have an attribute that explicitly sets the mime type of the payload to Json
Taking all that into consideration
QUESTION
I am using AWS Backup to back up some DynamoDB tables. Using the AWS Backup console to restore the back-ups I am prompted to restore to a new table. This works fine but my tables are deployed using CloudFormation, so I need the restored data in the existing table.
What is the process to get the restored data into the existing table? It looks like there are some third-party tools to copy data between tables but I'm looking for something within AWS itself.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-09 at 23:29At this time, AWS has no direct way to do this (though it looks like you can export to some service, then import from that service into an existing table).
I ended up writing my own code to do this.
QUESTION
I'm trying to implement a DynamoDB get_item
call using https://github.com/aws/aws-sdk-ruby/blob/0465bfacbf87e6bc78c38191961ed860413d85cd/gems/aws-sdk-dynamodb/lib/aws-sdk-dynamodb/table.rb#L697 via our Ruby on Rails app, dr-recommends.
From reviewing this DynamoDB CloudFormation stack that I wrote, I expect the following get_item
call to work, so I'm a little lost as to how to proceed.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-09 at 17:20GetItem() requires you to use the primary key.
You'll need to specify both hash(aka partition) and sort keys.
QUESTION
This might be a very silly question when it comes to dynamo DB.
Well,to summarize the issue I have a dynamoDB set up in my project.
(FYI, I have not setup a local dynamodb, I'm trying to connect to my remote db in lab environment)
The configuration for which is as follows:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-08 at 16:52The problem is that your local machine doesn't have an instance profile.
If you're looking to consume AWS services from your local machine, you will have to use a credentials provider that retrieves the information locally. I recommend using DefaultAWSCredentialsProviderChain, which looks for local configuration (either in $HOME/.aws or via environment variables or system properties), and also supports instance profiles (in case you're running on an EC2 instance).
That's why removing amazonDynamoDB.setCredentials(new InstanceProfileCredentialsProvider(false));
worked
QUESTION
When attempting to upload ~30,000 users into a dynamodb table using the Amazon.DynamoDBv2 wrapper for .net, not all records made it, however, there was no exception either.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-08 at 15:03I exited the process after the return from ExecuteAsync(). That was the problem. When I let it run I can see the data slowly build up. However, in the bulk insert I used a Task.Wait() because there was nothing to do until the records had been loaded. However, Iridium's answer above assited me with the second issue that revolved around ProvisionedThroughput exceptions.
QUESTION
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-07 at 12:45There are a couple of problems in your code:
- you need to parse the event body if it's JSON using
Item=json.loads(event['body'])
- you need to stringify the returned dict using
'body': json.dumps(response)
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install dynamoDB
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page