Shot | Screenshot testing library for Android | Build Tool library

We have fixed the issue by replacing

You can match single spaces by editing your CircuitID part to either match a space character that isn't followed by another space character (?! ) (negative lookahead), or one of the non-space characters [a-zA-Z0-9\-\/].

so the CircuitID part becomes (?(?:[a-zA-Z0-9\-\/]| (?! )){6,26})

regex101

I recently encountered a similar issue with boost after updating react native. After the panic wore off, and some good coffee, I was able to resolve by doing the following:

1. Open the /ios/.xcworkspace file in Xcode.
2. Raise the iOS Deployment Target (in my case I only bumped to 10).
3. Product > Clean Build Folder, then Product > Run.
4. Locate the boost error in the issue navigator and identify which pod the error is listed under (in my case it was RNReanimated).
5. Update the node package related to the pod (in my case, npm update react-native-reanimated
6. Finally, run pod install

After performing those steps, I was able to get my project up and running again.

Does Java MessageFormat have a platform lineseparator like String.format does?

According to my reading of the code, the answer is No.

And there aren't any extant RFEs or Bug reports about this that I can see in the Java or OpenJDK Bug trackers¹.

However, as Joop notes, since you are actually asking this in the context of logging, there are a few other ways to solve this (though not all will be practical):

• Ignore the problem. These messages are going into log files. Maybe it doesn't really matter that the line separators in messages in the log files don't always match the platform.
• Create a custom subclass of MessageFormat that recognizes a syntax that means "platform specific line separator".
• Handle the line separators by translating them in a custom log message appender or formatter; e.g.
  • Translate all line separators of the "wrong kind".
  • Recognize and translate a magic character sequence ...
• Change to a different logging framework that uses java.util.Formatter for message construction. AFAIK, most modern frameworks do.
• Submit an RFE.

^{1 - You could read that as "evidence" of how little use there is of MessageFormat in real world / modern applications, or how few people use it in contexts where line separators matter.}

@Bohemian commented:

Why do you want to avoid "passing System.lineseparator as an argument"?

I would have thought that was self-evident. It is clunky.

I think your issue lies in this line:

Attribute composition is not the time when attributes are added to the class; rather, it is the time at which:

• We commits to a particular set of attributes for the class, and communicate this to the underlying runtime (usually MoarVM), which calculates a memory layout for the object
• we tell each Attribute object to compose itself, which is its trigger to generate accessors, handles-related methods, and so forth

I'm not clear on what you are intend to achieve, in so far as attributes are externally readonly by default anyway, and so it'd make more sense perhaps to produce an error if somebody defines an rw one on something declared frozen. If you do want to modify attributes, you'd probably have more luck overriding add_attribute and tweaking the way the attribute works at that point (for example, something like method add_attribute($obj, $attr) { callwith($obj, $attr.clone(:!rw, :!has_accessor)) } may achieve what you want).

I ran into this same issue and solved it by adding ___recordID as a queryable index. When it is added to the list of indexes, the field changes to recordName.

To add this as a queryable index, go to the Schema Section -> Indexes, and click Add Basic Index.

Each pool is created from a factory contract, and they all use the same ABI.

You can lookup any of the valid pool addresses, for example the code from your question results in 0xC2e9F25Be6257c210d7Adf0D4Cd6E3E881ba25f8, and its ABI is already published.

first of all you are getting all data in casetExtend node all the variables you want to assign is not under that node. for that you need to navigate one level of child node.