openid | EGroupware OpenID Connect / OAuth2 server | OAuth library
kandi X-RAY | openid Summary
kandi X-RAY | openid Summary
EGroupware OpenID Connect / OAuth2 server
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Show client form
- Execute user input
- Get the claims for this account
- Validate the authorization request .
- Setup the encryption key
- Get Client Entity
- Save a new auth code
- Get an access token for a client
- Get array of tokens
- Save new access token .
openid Key Features
openid Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on openid
QUESTION
I've tried for many hours now and seem to have hit a wall. Any advice/help would be appreciated.
Goal: I want to authorize the express rest-api (ex client-id: "my-rest-api") routes (example resource: "WeatherForecast") across various HTTP methods mapped to client scopes (examples: "create"/"read"/"update"/"delete"). I want to control those permissions through policies (For example - "Read - WeatherForecast - Permission" will be granted if policy "Admin Group Only" (user belongs to admin group) is satisfied.
Rest-api will not log users in (will be done from front end talking directly to keycloak and then they will use that token to talk with rest-api).
Environment:
- Keycloak 15.1.1 running in its own container, port 8080, on docker locally (w/ shared network with rest-api)
- "my-rest-api": Nodejs 16.14.x w/ express 4.17.x server running on its own container on docker locally. Using keycloak-connect 15.1.1 and express-session 1.17.2.
- Currently hitting "my-rest-api" through postman following this guide: https://keepgrowing.in/tools/kecloak-in-docker-7-how-to-authorize-requests-via-postman/
What Happens: I can login from keycloak login page through postman and get an access token. However when I hit any endpoint that uses keycloak.protect() or keycloak.enforce() (with or without specifying resource permissions) I can't get through. In the following code the delete endpoint returns back 200 + the HTML of the keycloak login page in postman and the Get returns back 403 + "Access Denied".
Current State of Realm
- Test User (who I login with in Postman) has group "Admin".
- Client "my-rest-api" with access-type: Confidential with Authorization enabled.
- Authorization set up:
- Policy Enforcement Mode: Enforcing, Decision Strategy: Unanimous
- "WeatherForecast" resource with uri "/api/WeatherForecast" and create/read/update/delete client scopes applied.
- "Only Admins Policy" for anyone in group admin. Logic positive.
- Permission for each of the client scopes for "WeatherForecast" resource with "Only Admins Policy" selected, Decision Strategy: "Affirmative".
Current State of Nodejs Code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Apr-11 at 18:17So my team finally figured it out - the resolution was a two part process:
- Followed the instructions on similar issue stackoverflow question answers such as : https://stackoverflow.com/a/51878212/5117487 Rough steps incase that link is ever broken somehow:
- Add hosts entry for 127.0.0.1 keycloak (if 'keycloak' is the name of your docker container for keycloak, I changed my docker-compose to specify container name to make it a little more fool-proof)
- Change keycloak-connect config authServerUrl setting to be: 'http://keycloak:8080/auth/' instead of 'http://localhost:8080/auth/'
- Postman OAuth 2.0 token request Auth URL and Access Token URL changed to use the now updated hosts entry:
- "http://localhost:8080/auth/realms/abra/protocol/openid-connect/auth" -> "http://keycloak:8080/auth/realms/abra/protocol/openid-connect/auth"
- "http://localhost:8080/auth/realms/abra/protocol/openid-connect/token" -> "http://keycloak:8080/auth/realms/abra/protocol/openid-connect/token"
QUESTION
I'm trying to authenticate to OpenStreetMap via OAuth2 using AppAuth. Via Custom Tab I can retrieve the authorization code but the redirect URI does not open my app but gives an Address Not Found error in the Custom Tab. As you can see as I was experimenting around to solve this issue I used app.example.com
as host name, although the package name is com.example.app
, but even if I do use the package name as host name in the redirect URI (and change this in the manifest, gradle, osm etc.), it still does not work but results in an Invalid Redirect URI error. So I would assume something with the redirect URI isn't quite right, but I cannot figure out what it is.
Also I cannot use a custom scheme, as OSM only accepts https redirect URIs.
MainActivity.java:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-06 at 22:42Using HTTP redirect URIs requires these settings in the build.gradle file, and also has a prerequisite of app link registration via a hosted assetlinks.json file
:
QUESTION
For some reason, I can't use the Flutterfire CLI to configure an ios app on firebase. I've done this before but this time I'm gettings this error
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-15 at 16:08It's an authentication issue. Just logout firebase CLI and log in again.
To logout :
QUESTION
I read ton of articles, but still can't figure out what I'm missing. I'm running a django website from virtualenv. Here's my config file. The website address is replaced by , can't use that here.
...Config
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-23 at 15:28The error says that either you haven't got Django installed or didn't activate the virtual environment in which the Django was installed. Make sure that you check the list of installed packages and find Django in there, via:
QUESTION
My Webapp is deployed in Wildfly 25.0.1.Final and is secured using OpenID Connect (OIDC). WildFly 25 enables you to secure deployments using OpenID Connect (OIDC) without installing a Keycloak client adapter.
It is configured like this:
web.xml
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-09 at 15:42This is a known issue and documented here: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ELY-2284
If you upgrade to wildfly 26.0.1 it should be resolved.
QUESTION
I have some trouble configuring my Windows to work with az
command line tools. I have tested multiple configuration. One on locally installed system and one with windows based docker container. I get the same error on both system.
In case I issue the following command:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-31 at 15:27Finally I was able to resolve the issue as follows:
I've found the following documentation:
Setting up certificates for Azure CLI on Azure Stack Development Kit
The basic idea is to find the python installation used for Azure CLI and update the related certificate file.
In my case the Azure CLI was installed with python on the following location:
C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SDKs\Azure\CLI2\python.exe
And using the command, that was suggested, returned as follows:
QUESTION
I have an external identity provider that supports OpenID Connect (OIDC) and want to access Google Cloud Storage(GCS) directly, using a short-lived access token. So I'm using workload identity federation in order to provide a credential from my external identity provider and get a federated token in exchange.
I have created the workload identity pool and provider and connected a service account to it, which has write access to a certain bucket in GCS.
How can I differentiate the access to specific folder in the bucket according to the token provided from my external identity provider? For example for userA to have access only to folderA in the bucket. Can I do this using one service account?
Any help would be highly appreciated.
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-28 at 18:52The folders don't exist on Cloud Storage, it's a blob storage, all the object are stored at the bucket level. For human readability and representation, the /
are the folder separator, by convention.
Therefore, because directory doesn't exist, you can't grant any permission on it. The finer granularity is the bucket.
In your use case, you can't grant a write access at folder level, but you can create 1 bucket per user and therefore grant the impersonated service account on the bucket.
QUESTION
We are using keycloak to handle authentication (client/secret) in our API Gateway.
The Kong api service uses konnect-managed-plugin to refer to keycloak to authenicate client credentials and return a bearer token.
Future calls to other endpoints use oauth2-introspection to verify the bearer token via keycloak introspection
I almost have this working however, when I authenticate via Kong api gateway, it returns a bearer token, but this token fails introspection.
If I auth straight to keycloak, the bearer token works for introspection.
eg
Token from: http://kongapigateway.domain/getOAuthToken
- NOTE: We have not yet set up ssl on the kong api gateway
Returns:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-27 at 22:33You can fix this by setting Keycloak's frontend URL to your public URL. For details please refer to my answer to another but similar question.
QUESTION
I am using OpenID Connect in Keycloak as an authentication solution and I've just encountered the following scenario.
Client
A
sends an authorisation request to the Authorization server and provideredirect_url
of clientB
in that request.Authorization server authenticate the user and redirect the user to the provided
redirect_url
(which is for clientB
) withauthentication_code
.Client
B
communicates with Authorization server with its ownclient_id
and secret and takes its token.
I want to know why OpenID Connect has allowed this
process, is it a normal thing for a client to initiate authentication for another client? Why the issued authentication_code
is not bound to the client who has initiated the authentication and why it the authentication_code
can be used by other client with other client_id
?
Note: I know that validity of redirection_url
will be checked in that process but I want to know why authorization code is not bound to client_id itself.
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-13 at 09:31If it's indeed possible in Keycloak then it's a problem of the implementation, not the spec. The Oauth spec in section 4.1.2. indicates this for the authorization code:
The authorization code is bound to the client identifier and redirection URI.
As for the redirect URI it should also be verified and client A should be able to use redirect URI of client B only if that other redirect URI was whitelisted for client A.
The Proof Key for Code Exchange is also something which would prevent such a use of an Oauth flow as you described here.
QUESTION
I have following package.json
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-28 at 13:15To resolve this issue update the "passport" lib version in your package.json: from "passport": "^0.5.2", to "passport": "^0.4.0", so it's same as used in @nestjs/passport@8.0.1.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install openid
Install openid app via EGroupware setup
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page