iDict | iCloud Apple iD BruteForcer

I suggest to use strictNullCheck flag in compiler options. TS will start to look different on optional object. When you add | undefined to value definition strictNullCheck flag will force you to check is value is not undefined, or map type by as { id: number; name: string } syntax when you sure about returned type

I'm not sure is there a way to it compact - probaly not.

But you can simpify code a little bit and also don't spend O(n) for each .pop:

Using Pickle to save the model:

Hey bud I only have so much time a day to spend on this but I worked out a little better framwework for you to play with, try using elements in here working with it and modifying it, the skeleton of it should help you get all your goals accomplished with this certain code. I'll be back with more updates when I have time just wanted to give you something to play with! Enjoy!

py2to3 doesn't see the global picture. It just creates some equivalent code, replacing the functions that now don't create lists anymore by adding a list wrapper, to make sure that:

• one can subscript the result
• one can iterate on the result as many times as wanted

(it also puts parentheses around print, ... but not relevant here)

So it tries to make your code run, but the performance isn't guaranteed like at all.

In your example, the list wrapper is useless, as the dict consumes the iterator.

So this tool is useful to make code work quickly, but should not be used without comparing to your original code and decide what to keep/what to change.

The tool could probably be improved to:

• avoid wrapping when the iterator is used in a loop
• avoid wrapping when the iterator is passed to an object which takes an iterable as input.

In your case

If you examine the entry in the dictionary with a key of "What???" then naturally an entry must be created in the dictionary in order to show you that entry.

If you want to just check whether an entry exists, then perform a watch on iDict.Exists("What???").

Adding a watch is operating no differently to the following code:

Since you don't instantiate a component directly, rather Angular does, you can only use the constructor parameters to pass in services via dependency injection.

What are you trying to accomplish? You can use the private variable and your interface without defining it as a constructor function parameter.

Did you register your current class as the channel's delegate? You need to do this so that when the channel receives a message, it will call your delegate with the received message.

So in your class, I am assuming it's a UIViewController, declare it to conform to like so:

It's not getting the same dict. It's making a shallow copy of the original dict, and == compares by value, not by identity, so because it has all the same keys and values, it's equal, even though it's not the same dict.

If you tested print b._store is a, you'd get False, because is tests object identity.

As for your other question, I'm not 100% sure what you're going for there, but I think you're objecting to the fact that you aren't benefiting from inheriting from dict, since you still have an attribute storing all your values. That's only because you're not doing inheritance correctly here. You have to delegate up to the parent class's methods, rather than making your own _store attribute, and you'll reuse the storage of the parent. So for example, a correct __init__ here would be: