ag-model | basic extended model for CodeIgniter applications | Web Framework library

I am trying to implement a row style such that if important columns are missing a value, then it should be red (like an alert). I have the following logic:

I am trying to make a grid with ag-grid and activate sortable and filter, but it doesn't work towards localhost. In the columndefinition, I use ''':sortable true''' ''':filter true''''

But nothing happens. Does anyone know what is wrong?

When I tried adding the possibility for empty fields for one of my models, I get the following error-message: "TypeError: init() got an unexpected keyword argument 'allow_blank'"

What I tried doing was adding the keyword "allow_blank=True" to both a TextField and a CharField. Same error in both instances.

I am currently trying to implement a BFF (backend for front end architecture).

Using request-promise library I can successfully hit the other microservice but not able to return the result as a response from BFF microservice.

Each time it is returning this result Promise { pending } pending state, could somebody please help me out on this?

My main issue is to know how to receive data into BFF microservice from the other microservice that we are hitting and returning the result from microservice which is hitting other one.

Or if somebody could help me to let know how to access the result from inside .then of any promise?

The flow is like this:

Use option + command + L can not format the less code in .vue file exactly in WebStorm.

You see the upper snapshot, it will format like the css.the .tag-model-mask block code should indent more 2 spaces.

The bellow is the settings of indent, I also don't think this affect the .vue file.

I was going through a licensed guide to represent product families as a bag model in which occurrences are also taken into consideration to come up with a BDD.

I am trying to include the similar steps into my problem. The text says

If we adopt the bag-model, the implementation is similar to the set-model implementation except for handling the duplications of features. ROBDDs do not allow duplications of nodes. To handle the number of occurrences of a feature within the BDD itself, we have devised occurrence levels that encode it. We encode this number binary. For example, if we have a product with 3 features: x, y and z, and the maximum number of occurrences of a feature is seven, then we need three binary bits to encode it. Let the product family W have one product with three x features and six z features and zero y features. Our product family contains a product Pt, represented by the BDD in Figure 3.7. The BDD representing this bag describes the product in a way similar to that in the set model. However, we encode the occurrences in the levels of nodes containing bl, b2 and b3. We read in Figure 3.7 that, if x exists in this product, then we have to select bl and b2, but not b3. This is the binary code 011 representing b3, b2 and bl respectively which carries the occurrence of three for x. Similarly, for y to exist in this product, we get the binary occurrence encoding to be 000 which is 0 occurrences. For z, we get the binary occurrence of 110 which carries the number six.

So by this, for a product family Z = {{(x,3),(y,0),(z,6)}} the corresponding bdd would be ->

for a product Family W = {{(x,3),(y,1),(z,7)}} the BDD would be

But how did he come up with these BDDs, there must be some underlying formula for the BDDs. Could you please help me understand how to arrive at the same formula for a given family so that i can further use it similarly in my other use cases. Thanks.

I have a program that read tow files, the first file contain terms (one, or multiterms) seprated by semicolon (; ), the second file contain text, the goal is to determine the offset of the terms in the first file!

My program begin well fluctuating vacuum (correct offsset extracted 2 20, also 45 59 for quantum fields) , but when extracting the offset for example for terms nuclear physics (correct ofsset 396 411) my code generate 399 414! or Fermionic fields (my code generate 138 154) but the correct is 135 151

The code used is: