preserve-paths | composer plugin for keeping specified files | Build Tool library
kandi X-RAY | preserve-paths Summary
kandi X-RAY | preserve-paths Summary
Composer plugin for preserving paths while installing, updating or uninstalling packages.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Checks if a file exists .
- Rolls back all installed packages .
- Restores the installed paths .
- Get the list of packages from an event .
- Prepares the paths .
- Get the preserve - paths .
- Returns absolute paths .
- Get install paths from a list of packages .
- Get event listeners
- Activate the plugin wrapper
preserve-paths Key Features
preserve-paths Examples and Code Snippets
{
"repositories": [
{
"type": "composer",
"url": "https://packages.drupal.org/7"
}
],
"require": {
"composer/installers": "^1.2",
"drupal-composer/preserve-paths": "0.1.*",
"drupal/views": "3.*",
"drupal/drup
{
"extra": {
"preserve-paths": [
"web/sites/all/modules/contrib",
"web/sites/all/themes/contrib",
"web/sites/all/libraries",
"web/sites/all/drush"
]
}
}
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on preserve-paths
QUESTION
I have the following simple code running with brew linked to gcc and openmpi:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jan-28 at 06:12The problem was there were other /bin/
directories that had older versions of gcc and openmpi. When updating, the new files from /lib/
directories needed to be trasnfered to the /Cellar/
directories. The problem is fixed when first uninstalling all old macports and compilers with incorrect files and/or paths as sudo port -fp uninstall installed
, and brew uninstall openmpi
, and brew uninstall gcc
. Then reinstall new homebrew compilers brew install gcc
, brew install openmpi
. This gives the correct paths with configured files when submitting a make file.
QUESTION
i am new to gcovr. I have 3 files in my code namely main.cpp, math.cpp and math.hpp.I am compiled it with g++ using the following command
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Dec-25 at 14:54The problem is that you are explicitly passing the header file math.hpp
to the compiler. This does not contain any definitions that would produce object code, which leads to the following sequence of events:
main.cpp
is compiled. A filemain.gcno
is created that allows the coverage datamain.gcda
to be interpreted by gcov.math.cpp
is compiled which creates amath.gcno
file.math.hpp
is compiled which overwritesmath.gcno
with an empty file.
Therefore, no coverage data for math.cpp is recognized, and the file is excluded from coverage.
It is not necessary to pass math.hpp
to the compiler since your source files #include
this file. If we remove the header from the compiler invocation, we get the following gcovr output:
QUESTION
I am trying to generate coverage data for my unit tests, with the ultimate goal of displaying said data as part of our automated build output.
We build using makefiles and cs-make
, with cxxtest
as the unit test framework. The autogenerated test runner file is C++, with all our application files in C.
The unit test target and recipe for a unit test executable is:
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Oct-24 at 14:11The problem is gcovr/gcov need to correlate the coverage data with source files in order to generate the coverage report, and the use of -fprofile-dir
makes this difficult. AFAIK gcovr is not currently able to handle that case correctly. Gcovr's --object-directory
option is unable to help in this case.
Consider to cd
into a temp directory where you perform the build. So roughly, moving from
QUESTION
The program I want to profile with gcovr (or gcov/lcov) is located on a shared filesystem, along with the build directory from compiling the program, and I have multiple workers with which I intend to test my program, in parallel. To solve the race condition problem (the workers will all run my program, therefore all generating gcda files, named the same, in the same location on the shared filesystem), I redirect the gcda files to a separate target directory on each worker (as described here), and I have been running the following command:
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Jul-25 at 07:52This was cross-posted to the gcovr issue tracker on GitHub, here's the summary:
Gcovr currently expects that the .gcda and .gcno files are right next to each other (which is usually the case). The search paths affect where gcovr searches for these files. The --object-directory only provides a default value for the search paths, but here you have overridden that with an explicit search path. The gcovr --object-directory option is not passed through to the gcov --object-directory option.
As of gcovr 4.1 there is no option to solve this. You will have to copy the .gcno files from the build directory into each directory with coverage data. Alternatively you can run gcov manually and then aggregate the .gcov files with gcovr -g ...
.
Additional notes:
- gcov is not interested in the .o object files, only the .gcda files (written during test execution) and the .gcno files (written during compilation).
- gcovr and lcov are not directly related
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install preserve-paths
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page