direct-upload | Composer Package to Direct Upload to S3 | File Upload library
kandi X-RAY | direct-upload Summary
kandi X-RAY | direct-upload Summary
This package is designed to build the necessary AWS signature (v4), policy and form inputs for sending files directly to Amazon's S3 service. This is especially useful when uploading from cloud platforms and help to build 'twelve factor apps'. This project was sprouted from this blog post which might help explain how the code works and how to set it up. The blog post also has lots of useful comments, which might help you out if you're having problems. Supports PHP 7.2+ (if you need php 5.5+ use v1.*).
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Get form inputs .
- Set AWS credentials
- Generate the policy .
- Sets ACL name .
- Set an option
- Get option value
- Returns the field s name .
direct-upload Key Features
direct-upload Examples and Code Snippets
function dd(b,a,c,d,e,g){function i(a,b){var c=e.createElement("script"),d=function(){e.body.removeChild(c);b&&b()};c.type="text/javascript";c.src=a;Z?c.onreadystatechange=function(){/loaded|complete/.test(c.readyState)&&d()}:c.onload
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on direct-upload
QUESTION
I have a model called Answer
that can have many attachments. I have specified it as has_many_attached :answer_files
and permitted the parameter as per the docs however in this model I keep getting Unpermitted parameter: :#
in the logs. I have the same in another model using has_one_attached :logo
and that works fine.
Do note that I am using direct_upload: true
as per the docs in both models. What I do not understand is that the record does save and the files are being added to the active_storage_blobs table. It is just not being associated with my model.
I have also tried to re-install active storage to no avail.
Appreciate any assistance.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-01 at 19:13I managed to solve this with the assistance of u/endenis on Reddit. The answer is part of an association and I thought that I have to do it like this f.file_field answer.answer_files, multiple: true, direct_upload: true
but that is incorrect.
I had to do it this way f.file_field :answer_files, multiple: true, direct_upload: true
QUESTION
I'm using a React web app and trying to upload a file to AWS S3.
I've tried everything both locally (localhost:3000
) and when deployed to production (Vercel serverless functions).
I first use a fetch to retrieve a presigned url for the file upload, which works perfectly:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jan-30 at 04:10Make sure the file name match exactly with Key
QUESTION
Using rails 6 and trying to upload files using this drag and drop JS framework to local disk but am getting "Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 (Not Found)
". This is due to the url variable not being defined.
Console error: ActionController::RoutingError (No route matches [POST] "/undefined"
.
I've followed all the steps from here: https://edgeguides.rubyonrails.org/active_storage_overview.html.
JS Code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jul-22 at 18:16so I haven't exactly furthered my understanding of active storage, but I did find a solution that worked. In method 1, I simply changed the URL that was returning "undefined" to manually 'rails/active_storage/direct_uploads'
.
The JS code now looks like:
QUESTION
I need to upload a video to a 3rd party via API. Using the API I have requested this "Upload Location" which is valid for 15-minute. Now I need to upload my Active Storage video directly to this remote upload location. This remote location is not managed by me.
I have read the official documentation but it's not clear where I can change the default upload location url with this one. Doc: https://edgeguides.rubyonrails.org/active_storage_overview.html#direct-uploads
Upload location:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Oct-02 at 15:15If I'm understanding correctly, you're going to want to implement a custom ActiveStorage::Service for this 3rd party API. Behind the scenes, rails invokes url_for_direct_upload
to get the URL that you're wanting to customize.
You should be able to something close to working if you implemented a new service like so:
QUESTION
My company's website is managed and hosted by a third party. We'd like to provide a portal on the website that allows our clients to upload files directly to a Google Cloud Storage bucket without the file going through the website (these uploads can span thousands of files and several GB).
I've found a good guide for how to do it on AWS (https://softwareontheroad.com/aws-s3-secure-direct-upload/) but can't even determine if the equivalent functionality exists for Google, let alone how to do it.
Has anyone done this before?
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Aug-31 at 10:53Please consider providing us some more technical details on what you want to achieve. Things like programming languages, server platform, cloud provider where the website is hosted…
In a generalistic way, I can tell you that Google Cloud Storage has a similar approach to upload files which is Signed URLs
For example, if you are coding in Python with this you can upload a file to a bucket using a signed URL:
QUESTION
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jul-19 at 10:03I have tried uploading a txt
file with a presigned-put-url using two approaches:
- Sending A form data: (this is used with POST urls not PUT)
- This actually add the
content-disposition
header to the final file as mentioned in the question.
- Sending raw binary data (recommended way and this how PUT url is used!):
- The file was uploaded correctly, and does not include the
content-disposition
header.
Could you try sending the PUT
request without using formData
at all?
The ajax's data
attribute should have a value of file_data
, and the content-type
while the signing the S3 URL and sending (ajax) should be ContentType: 'binary/octet-stream'
.
If you need to use formData, check out S3's preSignedPost.
QUESTION
I am trying to setup ActionText for the first time on my Article
model.
This is how my Article
model looks:
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Apr-30 at 01:53I figured it out....kinda.
The issue was that I am getting some errors in my JS.
So the hack I did was to simply comment out that JS file that was giving a problem.
The issue is that I am using a Bootstrap Template that comes with a lot of JS files. So I can't easily go in and fix the problem (especially since JS isn't my strong suit).
Ideally, I would like to figure out how to prevent other JS errors from making Trix be executed.
I asked that question here.
QUESTION
I am using SimpleForm 5.0.2
along with ActionText.
I would like the main body field of my form to be multiple rows (say 10), but I can't figure out how to get it to work.
This is my current attempt:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Apr-29 at 08:23It looks like the rich_text_area
only accepts :class
option so the :input_html
does nothing here. But because the height is decided by CSS, we can achive what you want by overrding the default min-height CSS of trix-editor.
In app/assets/stylesheets/actiontext.scss
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install direct-upload
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page