parallel-for | ParallelFor is PHP class to iterate array in multi process
kandi X-RAY | parallel-for Summary
kandi X-RAY | parallel-for Summary
ParallelFor is PHP class to iterate array in multi process.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Run parallel process
- Sets the number of childs .
- Sets the aggregation function .
parallel-for Key Features
parallel-for Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on parallel-for
QUESTION
In my flow in Mule 4, I iterate over multiple files to get data from them and transform them to json. I use a parallel ForEach component to do this. Here are the expected outputs from both of these calls:
result 1:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-01 at 10:48Can you try changing the Payload type before merging it? Something like this:
QUESTION
I'm getting unpredictable errors in my program when running with a lot of threads and am trying to find where the problem sits by inserting critical sections. Now I've got to the following
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-23 at 06:13This is the code snippet in question from github.
QUESTION
I try to write 2D Cross correlation in Sycl and OneAPI. The idea is to write a kind of Map skeleton which wraps OneAPI calls hiding hardware targeting issues through some parameter specifying the kind of target (CPU or GPU/Accelerator).
this is my Map Class:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jul-15 at 13:09You are passing a sycl::accessor type to slice_matrix, but the signature of slice_matrix is:
QUESTION
I have a method in an AWS Lambda which receives a completed list of items. It processes those items and then inserts them into a Dynamo DB table. Order of processing or inserting into the DB does not matter.
I'm looking for the most thread-safe, yet easy to understand manner in which to make this run faster; Either by using async await
or something other (likely parallel?) operations.
I was thinking Parallel.ForEach()
but that seems a bit heavy. Is there a simpler, more obvious way?
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-10 at 20:22Here are some basic changes I would make to start off with. There may be other improvements you can make from there.
- Avoid
Thread.Sleep
in async code.Task.Delay
is the async equivalent. - Create many tasks before awaiting any. The runtime will try to run some concurrently if it can.
QUESTION
I need to fill a lot of very large arrays by opening up thousands of csv files, extracting columns of data, and inserting them into 3D and 4D matrices. I've tried writing this in parallel, but what always happens is that my computer crashes when my memory fills up. I've looked at this question, Parallel `for` loop with an array as output, but I have not gotten those suggestions to work for me. Here's my code (generalized where needed):
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-06 at 06:59I guess the part taking time is reading the CSVs.
So you can always return list(y[f], x[f], data$column)
(or even just data$column
) and fill the array later. Do not use .combine
then.
QUESTION
I try to analyze the execution time of my function on device. I read this link: https://docs.oneapi.com/versions/latest/dpcpp/iface/event.html but I did not find in the documentation any information about sycl::info::event_profiling, which let me to understand what they correspond exactly. I mean, the command_start, command_end, command_submit. for example: This is a part of my code, kernel,
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-01 at 10:02It is a bit clearer on the SYCL 2020 specification:
command_submit
is the timestamp of the command group submission to the SYCL runtime.command_start
is the timestamp of the actual parallel for startingcommand_end
is the timestamp of the parallel for completion
So, your kernel execution time in the device is command_start
- command_end
,
whereas the total processing time for a command group (i.e. with the potential copies, runtime overhead, etc) is command_submit
- command_end
.
QUESTION
With the below code, everything usually works fine. However, very rarely (once every month perhaps, when the code is run daily) the .Find()
method can't find the item it's looking for.
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Nov-12 at 14:09Since you said you never write to that list while reading - then reading itself doesn't cause any issues. All structures are thread safe when there are only readers and NO writers at all, that's why immutable structures are so popular - you cannot modify them so they are by design thread safe.
However, instead you are modifying fields of Person
entries stored in the list, while reading those fields from other threads at the same time. This is of course not safe.
It seems you believe that
QUESTION
I am looking to parallelise processing of a task which is dependent on an object (State
), which is not thread-safe, and whose construction is time-expensive.
For this reason, I was looking into partition-local variables, but either I am doing it wrong or looking for something else. This more or less represents my current implementation:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Oct-30 at 15:08You have a couple of options. The simplest is to create a single State
object, and synchronize the access to it by using a lock
:
QUESTION
I have the following code where I want to retrieve employee information for a given list of employee ids. I have validation in place to throw exception if the count is more than 1 million. In most cases the request will be less than 200K so I am splitting the request into 4 partitions, each partition containing equal number of employee ids. All 4 partitions are executed in parallel and joined together after Task.WhenAll. Can some one please give me some hints on improving this further ? I looked at https://houseofcat.io/tutorials/csharp/async/parallelforeachasync and https://medium.com/@alex.puiu/parallel-foreach-async-in-c-36756f8ebe62 but unable to make it to work. The code mentioned below works but its hard coded to split into 4 partitions. How do I make it more parallel with dynamic partitions with max degree of parallelism set to say 50? If the input is 100K ids, I want to split in 10 partitions and execute all 10 in parallel.
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Sep-20 at 05:55I believe you could be really creative about GetResult and rewrite in a better way so that queries are like where id greater than (and/or less than)
rather than ids in (... list)
. Assuming your GetResult is implemented in best possible way already and you simply need a way to achieve maximum parallel execution here is my solution.
QUESTION
I'm using TBB library like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Oct-01 at 13:08The error says 'blocked_range' requires template arguments
.
One solution is to add some template arguments. I've no idea what they should be but perhaps
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install parallel-for
PHP requires the Visual C runtime (CRT). The Microsoft Visual C++ Redistributable for Visual Studio 2019 is suitable for all these PHP versions, see visualstudio.microsoft.com. You MUST download the x86 CRT for PHP x86 builds and the x64 CRT for PHP x64 builds. The CRT installer supports the /quiet and /norestart command-line switches, so you can also script it.
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page