session-lock | Securely manage and preserve session data
kandi X-RAY | session-lock Summary
kandi X-RAY | session-lock Summary
Securely manage and preserve session data.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Configures the options .
- Starts the session .
- Writes data to the cache .
- Destroys the session .
- Garbage collection .
- Encrypt a value .
- Decrypts the given cipher .
session-lock Key Features
session-lock Examples and Code Snippets
Lines of Code : 16License : Permissive (MIT)
Copyuse Omatamix\SessionLock\SessionManager;
// Construct a new session manager.
$session = new SessionManager();
$session->start();
if ($session->exists()) {
echo "The session is running!";
}
$session->put('hello', 'world');
if ($sessi $session = new SessionManager([
'fingerprinting' => false,
]);
$session = new SessionManager([
'bind_ip_address' => false, // If set to true we will bind the ip address else dont.
'bind_user_agent' => false, // If set to true we $session = new SessionManager([
'config' => [
'use_cookies' => true,
'use_only_cookies' => true,
'cookie_httponly' => true,
'cookie_samesite' => 'Lax',
'use_strict_mode' => true,
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on session-lock
QUESTION
Currently, we have a dotnet core app with a background service that receives message from Service Bus with session enabled, where sessionId is the userId, and the message contains updates to user info. Now we would like to implement a function to temporarily pause updates to a specific user by blocking a specific userId/sessionId but still process the messages in order when unblocked. What would be the best way to approach this problem?
I've tried to look through the service bus documentation and samples. Mainly, message deferral, message session state and session state sample
And I've found some information on SessionState and Message deferral, and I wonder if they can be used to implement this feature and still guarantee processing order (FIFO regardless of whether the message was deferred). I was thinking of trying to store the sequence number in the session state and continue to receive deferred messages through that number and increment it to receive the next message until I run out of messages?
Currently, our code looks something like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Oct-16 at 17:35You should use SessionClient instead of using RegisterSessionHandler in QueueClient to better handle the deferring scenario and preserve order. You can maintain some step/sequence number in your message body. Also add LastProcessedStep/Seqence whenevr you actually process a message. Session state allows keeping track of the processing state a handler has related to a session, so that clients can be agile between processing nodes (including failover) during session processing. The sample handles the deferred message by maintaining that (Step). It combines the Deferral and Session features such that the session state facility is being used to keep track of the procesing state of a workflow where input for the respective steps arrives out of the expected order. Notice the sender code also which demonstrates that by sending message in unpredictable order, but by virtue of session state, receiver detects ordering.
QUESTION
I've got a long running php 7.2 script that is producing a zip file. I want to use a looping ajax call to check on the progress of building the zip file. The second script appears to be locked and doesn't start processing until the first script is completely done.
In fact, the second script doesn't even print the error_log() on line 1 of my index.php routing script until after the first script is completely finished.
The top of my index.php router script:
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Feb-27 at 01:40The built in web server is a single-threaded, single-process, synchronous server. It's only meant for testing purposes. It can only handle a single request at a time. It cannot serve multiple concurrent requests at the same time.
QUESTION
The problem:
When logged in, I click quickly to open multiple links in new tabs, the first one works fine, but the ones after aren't able to read the user from session, and cause the app to think "no user data = no access, redirect to login".
I was told this could be due to PHP's session locking. The idea being that the first page is loading, and by doing so, is reading the session. Before it's done, the next are trying to read the session, but it's still locked by the first.
It also happens if you simply click one link, then click a different link. Because the first link still hit the server causing it to lock the Session, so when the browser tries to take you to the 2nd instead, it can't read user and thinks you're not logged in.
This seems to be a very strange default behavior and I have to imagine someone has come up with a decent solution other than "just don't open multiple tabs" and "don't change your mind when clicking links".
This does not happen on my CakePHP 2.x PHP 5.x application, but IS happening on my CakePHP 3.x PHP 7.x application.
One Suggested Solution:
I was told to try Redis. While this sounds like a decent solution (Redis doesn't lock the session), it removes the beneficial aspect of session locking and also doesn't appear to work. Even after setting the CakePHP 3 app to use redis for sessions, and verifying it was writing the session data to redis, the problem still occurred.
Questions:
What is the standard method to deal with this problem? Does every CakePHP 3.x application actually have this bug by default?
Note / Additional minor question:
I noticed that the cookie value that Cake stores under "CAKE" changes on most page loads. The value is the session key (minus prefix). Does that mean it's setting a new session on every page load? If so, is there a reason for that?
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Sep-13 at 01:11That's not how session locking in PHP works, a locked session would block script execution until the session is being unlocked, it would not continue and leave you with no session access or an empty session.
If you are seeing a new session ID on every request, then that might be the problem (or a symptom of it), ie subsequent requests using already invalidated session IDs, that surely would leave you with an empty session, ie you'd be logged out.
Sessions are usually regenerated rather rarely, for example when logging in/out (to avoid replay attacks), or when the session times out. As a starting point, check your session timeout/lifetime configuration (\Cake\Network\Session::$_lifetime), also try a breakpoint in \Cake\Network\Session::renew() to check if it's being invoked unexpectedly and from where.
QUESTION
I tried a sample example to see how lock-on-active works. When I fire the rule without using agenda-group everything seems fine. But when i uncomment the agenda-group in the below code and set focus to group "Group B" no rules are fired.
Rule ...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Dec-18 at 13:10I was using older version of Drools ( 6.2.0 Final) . When I changed it to 7.4.1. The code worked
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install session-lock
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page
