verify | Laravel package to verify users | Authentication library
kandi X-RAY | verify Summary
kandi X-RAY | verify Summary
Verify your user mobile/email with a one-time password.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Send verify request .
- Verify the code .
- Register the package .
- Generate unique code
- Create the database table .
- Register the service provider .
- Returns the facade accessor .
- Migrate the database .
verify Key Features
verify Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on verify
QUESTION
I am using a company-hosted (Bitbucket) git repository that is accessible via HTTPS. Accessing it (e.g. git fetch
) worked using macOS 11 (Big Sur), but broke after an update to macOS 12 Monterey.
*
After the update of macOS to 12 Monterey my previous git setup broke. Now I am getting the following error message:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-02 at 07:12Unfortunately I can't provide you with a fix, but I've found a workaround for that exact same problem (company-hosted bitbucket resulting in exact same error).
I also don't know exactly why the problem occurs, but my best guess would be that the libressl library shipped with Monterey has some sort of problem with specific (?TLSv1.3) certs. This guess is because the brew-installed openssl v1.1 and v3 don't throw that error when executed with /opt/homebrew/opt/openssl/bin/openssl s_client -connect ...:443
To get around that error, I've built git from source built against different openssl and curl implementations:
- install
autoconf
,openssl
andcurl
with brew (I think you can select the openssl lib you like, i.e. v1.1 or v3, I chose v3) - clone git version you like, i.e.
git clone --branch v2.33.1 https://github.com/git/git.git
cd git
make configure
(that is why autoconf is needed)- execute
LDFLAGS="-L/opt/homebrew/opt/openssl@3/lib -L/opt/homebrew/opt/curl/lib" CPPFLAGS="-I/opt/homebrew/opt/openssl@3/include -I/opt/homebrew/opt/curl/include" ./configure --prefix=$HOME/git
(here LDFLAGS and CPPFLAGS include the libs git will be built against, the right flags are emitted by brew on install success of curl and openssl; --prefix is the install directory of git, defaults to/usr/local
but can be changed) make install
- ensure to add the install directory's subfolder
/bin
to the front of your$PATH
to "override" the default git shipped by Monterey - restart terminal
- check that
git version
shows the new version
This should help for now, but as I already said, this is only a workaround, hopefully Apple fixes their libressl fork ASAP.
QUESTION
Hi guys am a newbie in React when i start my project i get the Wepback V5 Error Message
Resolve updated : https://github.com/facebook/create-react-app/issues/11756#issuecomment-1001162736
This What am using!
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-21 at 09:19This looks like a new issue with many packages including web3 as these are not compatible with Webpack v5 without adding fallbacks for the polyfils.
Issue noted here: https://github.com/facebook/create-react-app/issues/11756
I solved this issue by adding the fallback to my webpack.config.js file;
QUESTION
I am using MongoDB(Mongo Atlas) in my Django app. All was working fine till yesterday. But today, when I ran the server, it is showing me the following error on console
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-03 at 05:57This is because of a root CA Let’s Encrypt uses (and Mongo Atals uses Let's Encrypt) has expired on 2020-09-30 - namely the "IdentTrust DST Root CA X3" one.
The fix is to manually install in the Windows certificate store the "ISRG Root X1" and "ISRG Root X2" root certificates, and the "Let’s Encrypt R3" intermediate one - link to their official site - https://letsencrypt.org/certificates/
Copy from the comments: download the .der field from the 1st category, download, double click and follow the wizard to install it.
QUESTION
Discussion about this was started under this answer for quite simple question.
ProblemThis simple code has unexpected overload resolution of constructor for std::basic_string
:
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-05 at 12:05Maybe I'm wrong, but it seems that last part:
QUESTION
First, the question: is there a way to choose the platform (e.g. x86_64, AMD64, ARM64) for a GitHub Codespace?
Here's what I've found so far:
Attempt 1 (not working):
From within GitHub.com, you can choose the "machine" for a Codespace, but the only options are RAM and disk size.
Attempt 2 (EDIT: not working): devcontainer.json
When you create a Codespace, you can specify options by creating a top-level .devcontainer
folder with two files: devcontainer.json
and Dockerfile
Here you can customize runtimes, installed packages, etc., but the docs don't say anything about determining architecture...
...however, the VSCode docs for devcontainer.json
has a runArgs
option, which "accepts Docker CLI arguments"...
and the Docker CLI docs on --platform say you should be able to pass --platform linux/amd64
or --platform linux/arm64
, but...
When I tried this, the Codespace would just hang, never finishing building.
Attempt 3 (in progress): specify in Dockerfile
This route seems the most promising, but it's all new to me (containerization, codespaces, docker). It's possible that Attempts 2 and 3 work in conjunction with one another. At this point, though, there are too many new moving pieces, and I need outside help.
- Does GitHub Codespaces support this?
- Would you pass it in the Dockerfile or devcontainer.json? How?
- How would you verify this, anyway? [Solved:
dpkg --print-architecture
oruname -a
] - For Windows, presumably you'd need a license (I didn't see anything on GitHub about pre-licensed codespaces) -- but that might be out of scope for the question.
References:
https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/remote/devcontainerjson-reference
https://docs.docker.com/engine/reference/commandline/run/
https://docs.docker.com/engine/reference/builder/
https://docs.docker.com/desktop/multi-arch/
https://docs.docker.com/buildx/working-with-buildx/
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-17 at 21:44EDIT: December 2021
I received a response from GitHub support:
The VM hosts for Codespaces are only x86_64 and we do not offer any ARM64 machines.
So for now, setting the platform does nothing, or fails.
But if they end up supporting multiple platforms, you should be able to (in Dockerfile)
RUN --platform=arm64|amd64|x86-64 [image-name]
,
Which is working for me in the non-cloud version of Docker.
Original answer:
I may have answered my own question
In Dockerfile
:
I had RUN alpine
changed to
RUN --platform=linux/amd64 alpine
or
RUN --platform=linux/x86-64 alpine
checked at the command line with
uname -a
to print the architecture.
Still verifying, but seems promising. [EDIT: Nope]
So, despite the above, I can only get GitHub codespaces to run x86-64. Nevertheless, the above syntax seems correct.
A clue:
In the logs that appear while the codespace is building, I saw target OS: x86
Maybe GitHub just doesn't support other architectures yet. Still investigating.
QUESTION
We're facing an issue where any event listeners or global variables we attach to window
does not seem to be there in our production
build (but they are there in the development
build).
- Webpack config: https://gist.github.com/saadq/9f2f800c88716d11410e63859382f47d
- Build script:
webpack --mode=production
Context:
We have a use case where our webapp renders inside a parent app. The parent app basically needs to tell us when we need to render our app. To do this, we have tried using event listeners as well as global functions.
How our app is loaded into the parent appTo render our webapp inside the parent app, the following happens:
- The parent app makes an HTTP call to
myappwebsite.com/asset-manifest.json
. This is like the defaultasset-manifest.json
that gets created for anycreate-react-app
webapp. - The parent app finds the path to the main
bundle.js
from this asset manifest, and then makes an HTTP call to fetch ourbundle.js
using this path (e.g.myappwebsite.com/bundle.js
). - They dynamically inject a
script
tag into theirhead
with itssrc
set to ourbundle.js
to load our app's bundled javascript. - They listen for the
onload
event of this newscript
element before trying to call any of our code or dispatching any events.
Child app:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-13 at 20:19Add a node entry with global: true
to your config:
QUESTION
First, I tried to load using:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-23 at 22:57I was having a similar CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED error downloading CIFAR-10. Putting this in my python file worked:
QUESTION
I am aware that Let's Encrypt made changes that may impact older clients because a root certificate would expire. See DST Root CA X3 Expiration (September 2021).
However, I didn't think this could impact me because my development machine is up-to-date.
But since today I get the message while doing a git pull
:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-17 at 13:39I was facing a similar issue with DevOps build agents. But I can access the DevOps server web interface without any issue.
To solve this,
- I updated my Let's Encrypt client (I'm using Certify The Web)
- I have renewed my certificate
After that, the DevOps agent is able to do a Git pull.
QUESTION
We are using firebase phone authentication to authenticate our users. We've been using it for over a year now.
Today at 13:00 GMT, new users are receiving 17028 An invalid safety_net_token was passed after entering their phone number.
I tried to verify each of the causes I found on the firebase docs:
- Verifying the SHA1 and SHA256 on the firebase console (We use the fingerprints that are on the play store console)
- Verifying the package name
The last app update was on October 1st and since then thousands of users created an account with Firebase Auth and there were no configuration changes on the firebase console.
Upon looking at other StackOverflow questions, the error we are getting is not the same as 17028 A safety_net_token was passed, but no matching SHA-256 was registered in the Firebase console. Please make sure that this application's packageName/SHA256 pair is registered in the Firebase Console Even though it is the same error code, in our case, it says an invalid token was passed.
We are using firebase with react-native-firebase module.
EDIT: After disabling Android device verification API from Google Cloud Console the verification is now working but with no device verification. (Users have to verify they're not robots with a CAPTCHA).
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-18 at 08:05Update: It is working fine now, and the outage has been fixed.
It looks to be a firebase internal issue, and the only solution now is to disable "Android Device Verification" and all your users will see the Recaptcha page.
check https://status.firebase.google.com/ https://status.firebase.google.com/incidents/TYeQBVB4kkzyk2kE8vbP
QUESTION
I was trying to verify in a static_assert
that a program had really two distinct classes produced from a template by comparing the pointers on their static fields. After some simplifications the program looks as follows:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-11 at 18:01Yes, comparison of pointers to static class members (including for classes generated in result of template instantiations) in a static_assert
clause is allowed, and pointers to different objects (and the members of the different template instantiations are different objects) must compare unequal (but one should understand that it has to do with comparing neither real run-time addresses nor even static addresses in an executable, if any in the executable (there are details of it below)).
Issuing the compilation error from the question is a result of a bug of gcc
.
The bug report for the exact compilation error by the author of the question: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102175
The related bugs reports:
- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85428
- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89074
- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94716
The code will work for gcc 11.2 with -std=c++20
and gcc 7.5 with -std=c++17
if the fields are explicitly specialized, like as follows:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install verify
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page