sms | Simple SMS Gateway Package for sending short text messages | SMS library

You can try saving the unique device ID of the user upon registration then you can check on login whether the user is on that specific device. For getting the unique device ID, you can check here.

You can have your dropdown inside the form, then when it's time to submit, intercept that and append the dropdown value to the user's text.

For this SOLUTION, I do the interception by not having a button that sends the form to the server directly. Instead a script is called on it's behalf to then append the dropdown value.

All other explanations are in the code comments.

We have fixed the issue by replacing

By design, iOS apps have no access to incoming SMS messages. There are many discussions out there on a similar topic.

• Link 1
• Link 2
• Link 3
• Link 4

The main reason for the restriction is privacy. There is no documented public API to receive a callback when SMS is received. If you try to hack iOS and listen for private notifications then might be your app will be rejected by the App Review team.

While doing research on this topic I found something interesting, you can create an extension that can receive incoming SMS and call events for the purpose of SPAM filtering. This type of extension is called the SMS and Call reporting extension in Apple's ecosystem. While looking at the documentation of this extension, at first glance I thought we can achieve the asked behavior if we can notify our host app about the incoming messages. But while scrolling to the end of the document I found that by design this extension has some additional restrictions:

• The extension cannot share data with the host app.
• The extension can't access the network directly.
• The extension receives the event only if the sender's number is not on the contact list

Anyways it's all about docs, I have not tried anything on the extension. What you can do is try to create an extension and see for other possible solutions.

Example:

1 bad solution in my mind is your extension call your server with the SMS content and then your server forward the SMS content in a silent push notification payload. When your app received the silent notification it serves the purpose of prefilling the field. But again this is not the intended purpose of the extension.

In my opinion, the best is what you have already achieved i.e. setting the text field's content type.

Under the hood, Scala pattern matching often boils down to code that's exactly like the if (notification instanceof Email) { ... } else if (notification instanceof SMS) Java code.

The particular example you give, of an abstract class Notification which isn't sealed is one where the Scala code is no better (except perhaps expressing overall intent more clearly) than the if/instanceof tree.

This is because the main benefit of pattern matching is the possibility of exhaustivity checking. With the if/instanceof approach and the example of pattern matching you present, you aren't going to be alerted that you haven't handled every case (e.g. you left off the VoiceRecording case).

By making Notification sealed (e.g. sealed abstract class Notification), the Scala compiler will ensure that no Scala code in other files (technically, compilation units, which are for all intents and purposes files) can extend Notification; since it now knows all the possible Notifications, it can then raise a compiler error if you miss a case. There's no reliable way to do this in the if/instanceof case because that's a lower level of abstraction.

I recently faced a similar problem and here is my solution.

1. First of all, I found this documentation. Here you can find these test phone numbers/accounts which you can use.
2. In the BuildVars file, I've set both DEBUG_VERSION and DEBUG_PRIVATE_VERSION to "true".
3. Deploy an app and check how it works with Test Accounts. Don't forget: It's very necessary to tick the "Test Backend" checkbox, otherwise, Telegram Test Accounts will not work!
4. I turned on a "Managed publishing" in the Google Play Console (it allows you to send a Bundle to review and manually send an app to production after it if needed).
5. I described how exactly the Google Play Team should use these accounts to check my app in App Content -> App access in Google Play Console.
6. After I passed the review, I built another Bundle, in which I've set both DEBUG_VERSION and DEBUG_PRIVATE_VERSION back to "false" and sent this bundle to the review again (this version will go to Production)

What you're looking for is a look-ahead group. Whether you make that a positive look-ahead and use the negated character set \D or a negative look-ahead with the character set \d doesn't really matter- I'll outline both below:

The problem has been resolved.

[Release Notes Google Services] : https://developers.google.com/android/guides/releases

December 16, 2021 The latest updates to play-services-base and play-services-tasks resolve the issue that can lead to runtime NPEs (NullPointerException) when handling Task results in Kotlin code. If you're using any of the library versions listed in the December 09, 2021 release, you can avoid the runtime NPEs by explicitly depending on v18.0.1 of play-services-base and play-services-tasks. Add the following to the dependencies section of your build.gradle:

implementation 'com.google.android.gms:play-services-base:18.0.1' implementation 'com.google.android.gms:play-services-tasks:18.0.1' In January 2022, we plan to release new versions of the other artifacts released on December 09 with new POM dependencies on the 18.0.1 versions of play-services-base and play-services-tasks.

The latest update to Firebase includes changes to:

Firebase Android BoM (Bill of Materials) Firebase SDK for Google Analytics This Firebase release picks up the latest versions of play-services-base and play-services-tasks (v18.0.1) to fix the issue described in the December 09, 2021 release.

For more information, see the Firebase Android SDK Release Notes.