x509 | PHP library for X.509 public key certificates | TLS library
kandi X-RAY | x509 Summary
kandi X-RAY | x509 Summary
This library provides a pure PHP implementation of X.509 certificates. The class hierarchy adapts to the ASN.1 types, which makes it easy to use corresponding RFC's as a reference documentation.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Calculates the intersection between two given policies .
- Process certificate .
- Resolve paths to target .
- Parse an ASN sequence .
- Initialize the state .
- Verify AC s issuer s signature .
- Create a DateTime instance from a time string .
- Create from certification request .
- Create from TaggedType .
- Returns true if the certificate contains the given certificate .
x509 Key Features
x509 Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on x509
QUESTION
I'm experimenting with kubernetes and a minio deployment. I have a k3s 4 node cluster, each one with 4 50GB disk. Following the instructions here I have done this:
First I installed krew in order to install the minio and the directpv operators.
I installed those two without a problem.
I formatted every Available hdd in the node using
kubectl directpv drives format --drives /dev/vd{b...e} --nodes k3s{1...4}
I then proceed to make the deployment, first I create the namespace with
kubectl create namespace minio-tenant-1
, and then I actually create the tenant with:kubectl minio tenant create minio-tenant-1 --servers 4 --volumes 8 --capacity 10Gi --storage-class direct-csi-min-io --namespace minio-tenant-1
The only thing I need to do then is expose the port to access, which I do with:
kubectl port-forward service/minio 443:443
(I'm guessing it should be a better way to achieve this, as the last command isn't apparently permanent, maybe using a LoadBalancer or NodePort type services in the kubernetes cluster).
So far so good, but I'm facing some problems:
- When I try to create an alias to the server using mc the prompt answer me back with:
mc: Unable to initialize new alias from the provided credentials. Get "https://127.0.0.1/probe-bucket-sign-9aplsepjlq65/?location=": x509: cannot validate certificate for 127.0.0.1 because it doesn't contain any IP SANs
I can surpass this with simply adding the --insecure
option, but I don't know why it throws me this error, I guess is something how k3s manage the TLS auto-signed certificates.
Once created the alias (I named it test) of the server with the
--insecure
option I try to create a bucket, but the server always answer me back with:mc mb test/hello
mc: Unable to make bucket \test/hello. The specified bucket does not exist.
So... I can't really use it... Any help will be appreciated, I need to know what I'm doing wrong.
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-14 at 13:32Guided by information at the Minio documentation. You have to generate a public certificate. First of all generate a private key use command:
QUESTION
I am trying to use the Netsuite Rest api. Below are the steps I took. https://docs.oracle.com/en/cloud/saas/netsuite/ns-online-help/section_162730264820.html
Created a Integration Record in Netsuite
Create a self signed cert:
...
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-01 at 00:03I ran into the exact same issue and here's how I resolved it.
The function below actual sends the request:
QUESTION
I've exported the root CA cert (ISRG Root X1) used by StackOverflow's digital certificate, as a DER encoded binary X.509 (.cer) file and used openssl in cmd to find out the modulus/exponent:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-06 at 23:52C# does not support a low level verifying process, in particular no decryption with the public key is possible. However, this is supported by Bouncy Castle:
QUESTION
In the following command, openssl x509 -in example.crt -hash -noout
outputs 8927dc31
.
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-06 at 13:11The first 4 bytes (8 hex-letters) of the sha1 hash of the ASN.1-encoded subject value (issuer value for -issuer_hash
).
You can reproduce the hash with the following command:
QUESTION
I was trying to build a new image for a small dotnet core 3.1 console application. I got an error:
failed to solve with frontend dockerfile.v0: failed to create LLB definition: failed to copy: httpReadSeeker: failed open: failed to do request: Get https://westeurope.data.mcr.microsoft.com/42012bb2682a4d76ba7fa17a9d9a9162-qb2vm9uiex//docker/registry/v2/blobs/sha256/87/87413803399bebbe093cfb4ef6c89d426c13a62811d7501d462f2f0e018321bb/data?P1=1627480321&P2=1&P3=1&P4=uDGSoX8YSljKnDQVR6fqniuqK8fjkRvyngwKxM7ljlM%3D&se=2021-07-28T13%3A52%3A01Z&sig=wJVu%2BBQo2sldEPr5ea6KHdflARqlzPZ9Ap7uBKcEYYw%3D&sp=r&spr=https&sr=b&sv=2016-05-31®id=42012bb2682a4d76ba7fa17a9d9a9162: x509: certificate has expired or is not yet valid
I have checked an old dotnet program which my dockerfile was working perfectly. I got the same error. Then, I jumped to Docker Hub and checked the MS Images to see that all MS images have been updated for an hour. And then they have been updated once again, 10 Minutes ago xD. However, I still cannot pull the base images of mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/runtime:3.1 and mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/sdk:3.1. My whole Dockerfile is:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-26 at 09:25so as @Chris Culter mentioned in a comment above, I just restarted my machine and it works again.
It is kind of strange because I already updated my Docker Desktop, restarted, and cleaned/ purged the docker data. None of those helped, just after restarting my windows it works again!
QUESTION
I'm dealing with an Enterprise GitHub server with an expired certificate, and I would like to use the GitHub CLI tools.
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-05 at 00:20This is followed by cli/cli
issue 1735 (for a similar case), which clearly states:
We won't be adding an option to skip certificate verification because that would be insecure and would defeat the point of SSL and certificates being enforced in the first place.
So, no, it is not possible to skip SSL check with gh
.
You would need to add a proxy (like caddy) in front of that server, which would in turn proxy-pass the query, while ignoring the expired certificate, to the actual GitHub server.
QUESTION
I'm currently playing around with GitLab runners to better understand how they work in the context of a CI/CD pipeline. I followed the instructions in the GitLab docs for creating a self-managed runner (i.e. my personal Windows laptop):
- Installed the GitLab Runner executable
- registered my runner with GitLab
- disabled shared runners for my toy project
- modified
toml
file to usepowershell
as shell executor instead ofpwsh
After going through these steps, I created a CI/CD pipeline using the GitLab web UI. The default .gitlab-ci.yml
file generated looks like this:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-30 at 11:30That is part of any runner (self-managed or not) workflow
The idea is for your commands (any command) to operate on your code base, which is cloned first.
Regarding the timeout and the error, see "Self-signed certificates or custom Certification Authorities all tiers"
For connections to the GitLab server: the certificate file can be specified as detailed in the Supported options for self-signed certificates targeting the GitLab server section.
This solves the
x509: certificate signed by unknown authority
problem when registering a runner.
QUESTION
I have a private key that was generated by running:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-30 at 11:17Depending on your .NET version, you may not need BouncyCastle at all. As of .NET Core 3.1 there is RSA.ImportEncryptedPkcs8PrivateKey()
for DER encoded encrypted private PKCS#8 keys and as of .NET 5.0 there is even RSA.ImportFromEncryptedPem()
for PEM encoded encrypted keys.
Otherwise with C#/BouncyCastle the import of an encrypted private PKCS#8 key is available e.g. with:
QUESTION
I have created a kdb file in my IBMMQ (docker) using below command:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-20 at 14:59This command will import all certs contained in the p12 file to the kdb.
QUESTION
The microstack.openstack project recently enabled/required tls authentication as outlined here. I am working on deploying an openstack cluster to microstack using a terraform example here. As a result of the change, I receive an unknown signed cert error when trying to create an openstack network client data source.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-08 at 19:45I think insecure
provider parameter is what you are looking for:
(Optional) Trust self-signed SSL certificates. If omitted, the OS_INSECURE environment variable is used.
Try:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install x509
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page