laravel-base | boiler plating code and provides sensible defaults | Authorization library
kandi X-RAY | laravel-base Summary
kandi X-RAY | laravel-base Summary
Quickly scaffold out a fully functional app within seconds. Come on, be lazy.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Deletes migration files .
- Detect singular table name .
- Setup the database .
- Validate a validator .
- Handle the authenticated user .
- Get role data .
- Edit user profile .
- Handles the deletion .
- Runs the database .
- Remove table .
laravel-base Key Features
laravel-base Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on laravel-base
QUESTION
I am using Supervisord to help keep my Laravel-based App queue running. And I am wondering if the below configuration is correct.
In Laravel docs, for example, numprocs
is set 8, which means that Supervisord will run queue:work 8 times, is and why this is a good thing?
Also, should I be using --daemon in the queue:work command?
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jan-03 at 17:15numprocs
will spawn 8 processes that will then poll the queue every 3 seconds. When daemon
is set, these processes will not restart unless told to which has both advantages in terms of server load and disadvantages in the form of some potential edge cases when updating your code base.
Having 8 processes means that you have potentially 8 times the throughput when running jobs.
Example:
There are many scenarios where having multiple processes running in parallel are advantageous.
For instance, say you are processing 1000 users and want to check how many comments each has made in the last month. Say each check takes a minute to process (extreme but it makes a better point), it would take 1000 minutes to complete if you run then in sequence by looping through a array or collection of a 1000 users. That's over 16 hours!
If you queued these as jobs and have numprocs
set to 16, then you are done in just over and hour!
QUESTION
Has anyone successfully configured VSCode to debug Laravel-based website? After having followed numerous articles and tutorials, I have made it to the point where I can ask VSCode to "Listen to XDEBUG", but I haven't been able to do normal VS-style debugging where I could just hit F5 to launch current the website in my favorite browser and it would break into VSCode when it hit a breakpoint, just like we do in full Visual Studio or Eclipse.
I have following things correctly setup on my machine:
- VSCode 1.25.1
- XAMPP 1.8
- XDEBUG (configured and working)
- PHP Debug extension for VSCode
I'm not sure what launch configuration do I need to use in my launch.json
. The two configurations that come with PHP Debug extension look like this:
ANSWER
Answered 2019-May-21 at 14:50Finally got it working. Here are the things if anyone else needs it.
- Make sure you have XDEBUG set up and running on your Apache server.
- Install debugger extension for your favorite browser. Extensions are available for Chrome, Edge and FireFox (can be searched and installed from within VSCode).
Set up
launch.json
so that it launches two configs in parallel. This is done through so-called compound configurations. Here is mine that launches PHP + XDEBUG and EDGE browser:
QUESTION
I am using the Consolibyte SDK. It's working fine on my local server (XAMPP), but when I move it to my company's Laravel-based system, the web connector says "Authentication Failed". I have the route set up and everything, and tested it in Postman, and it does return:
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Nov-30 at 13:25This error:
Client found response content type of 'text/html; charset=UTF-8', but expected 'text/xml'.
Means that something is sending a Content-Type: text/html
header, and overriding the Content-Type: text/xml
header the framework is trying to send.
Laravel is probably doing this. Try adjusting your response/route in Laravel to return text/xml
instead:
Example:
QUESTION
I have an Laravel-base API which handles both client and admin endpoints (there are two sites like domain.com
and admin.domain.com
).
My auth is based on cookie, which domain is <.domain.com>
. As you can see, this cookie is acceptable for both domains.
I use Eloquent Api Resources for transformation data layer. Is my when()
route check here safe and right?
ANSWER
Answered 2018-Jul-24 at 19:28I think your approach is fine. The route name is something internal and the user cannot tinker with it. You could improve it by using \Route::is('api.admin.*')
though. It would then work for all of your admin API routes.
QUESTION
To scroll through content on my Laravel-based web app, there are arrows (anchor tags) on the left and right side of the screen.
Code
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Jan-07 at 13:09I prefer the use of .which
over .keyCode
when jQuery is used.
Then I can't tell why it doesn't work with keypress
... But it works fine with keyup
.
You have to have an element to bind the event. So you can bind it to the whole document if you wish...
QUESTION
When I access localhost
or 127.0.0.1
, I should be displayed the index.html default page from apache.
However, when I access it, it displays the Laravel welcoming screen.
- I do have some Laravel projects under
/var/www/html
, indeed.
But it seems Apache is confused as to what page to display in the root directory, displaying Laravel's welcome screen instead of the usual index.html
.
This would not be much of a problem, but it also happens that, whenever accessing any other project which is not Laravel-based, i'm faced with Laravel's 404 screen.
Any ideas as to what happened here?
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Nov-01 at 20:17Some minutes after typing this question, i found the answer myself.
I deleted the file /etc/apache2/sites-enabled/000-default.conf
, which sets the default response for localhost
request.
So, Apache took Laravel's page as the default for answering any request to the server.
QUESTION
I have two environments:
- A: Laravel-based application API server
(I have full permission for this) - B: External API server for A
(I don't have permission to access user without his/her authentication)
users
table has only two columns, id
and external_user_id
. id
is created by A and external_user_id
is created by B.
If I implement a custom provider, I need to follow two contracts:
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Oct-05 at 04:05- Throw
BadMethodCallException
on every method - Never use
Auth::attempt()
- Only use
Auth::login()
QUESTION
I recently created a new production deployment for a new Laravel-based system. Initially, I had a few permissions issues with the storage folder that I resolved pretty easily. Once I resolved those, I had the app running correctly, but upon my next deployment (with Envoyer), I ran into a different issue that I haven't been able to pin down.
I'm now getting a fatal PHP error that I wasn't getting before:
PHP Fatal error: Uncaught ReflectionException: Class view does not exist in /var/www/Core/releases/20170804125010/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Container/Container.php:719\nStack trace:\n#0 /var/www/Core/releases/20170804125010/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Container/Container.php(719): ReflectionClass->__construct('view')\n#1 /var/www/Core/releases/20170804125010/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Container/Container.php(598): Illuminate\Container\Container->build('view')\n#2 /var/www/Core/releases/20170804125010/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Container/Container.php(567): Illuminate\Container\Container->resolve('view')\n#3 /var/www/Core/releases/20170804125010/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Foundation/Application.php(708): Illuminate\Container\Container->make('view')\n#4 /var/www/Core/releases/20170804125010/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Container/Container.php(1139): Illuminate\Foundation\Application->make('view')\n#5 /var/www/Core/releases/20170804125010/vendor/laravel/framewo in /var/www/Core/releases/20170804125010/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Container/Container.php on line 719
I've played around with various permissions, tried manually running composer install/update, npm install/etc
. with no resolution. Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
ANSWER
Answered 2017-Aug-05 at 15:50After quite a bit of experimentation with no luck, I think I resolved it. The Ubuntu user that was set up for deployment with Envoyer was, by default, deploying everything with the 'envoyer' group permissions. This created a permissions conflict with the actual app permissions on Ubuntu. I updated the default group for the deploying user to 'www-data' and it seems that everything is cleared up now.
QUESTION
So I'm trying to use laravel-based login table, which is the hash that I can't even compare it with basic php hash login. No, you can't make hash exactly look like laravel. But I use the remember_token
that is come from users
table.
Here is the code on my laravel view:
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Jul-06 at 02:17Put session_start();
right under the PHP tag. It must be called before there is any output and just to be on the safe side, include it before there is anything else called either.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install laravel-base
composer create-project zulfajuniadi/laravel-base projectfolder where projectfolder is the folder you want to create your app.
Create your database
Change directory to projectfolder cd projectfolder
php artisan app:install
php artisan migrate --seed
php artisan serve (This will run a development server on port 8000)
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page