posz | z implementation for Powershell | Command Line Interface library

I changed all my es6 classes into es6 modules, and used import. I don't think there was a solution for this with cdn or raw git scripts.

Solved it by adding [i] to

df2["posX"][i] = y[0]["value"]

I think the issue is with your AnimationMixer.update() call. If you look at the docs, update is expecting a time-delta in seconds, but it looks like you're passing the total running time. This means it should receive the time passed since the last frame. You can fix this by using clock.getDelta(); as the argument:

instances (clones) of the coin prefab != the coin prefab reference itself. They simply are not equal but two different objects...

Rather give it either a Tag and check hit.gameObject.CompareTag

As you might have noticed, going from nat to rat there are two embeddings: first from nat to int, then from int to rat. The latter is a ring morphism, you can thus use generic morphism theorems such as rmorphM and rmorphB, in your case you could start with rewrite -!rmorphB -rmorphM ler_int.

The former embedding (Posz : nat -> int) however is not a ring morphism, you could still use PoszM indeed (Posz is multiplicative), but the major problem would be that Posz (m - n) != Posz m - Posz n in general (and the silent insertion of the coercion complicates matter here). So it would appear that you would need to postulate both (price bs' i <= price bs i)%N and 'ctr_ (sOi i') <= 'ctr_ (sOi i). However thanks to leq_subLR you can avoid the first hypothesis.

Here is a mock-up of your problem and a solution (it would have been nice to have the full context if you could not minimize). Assuming I reverse engineered the right types for price _ _ (thereafter abbreviated with p and p'), 'ctr _ _ (thereafter abbreviated with c and c') and value_per_click _ (abbrev v):

I see a couple problems.

First, your traverse call is on gltf.Scene (with a capital S). This capitalized property name is incorrect, and I'm surprised your browser doesn't throw an error over it. Use gltf.scene like you did to add it to your scene.

Next, the code you shared never calls _LoadModel. This could be a big reason why your model isn't showing up, unless you're calling it somewhere else.

I've never seen anything structured like this, but other than the issues I pointed out, it should work. If not, consider simplifying some of your ideas here, like moving everything from _Initialize into constructor, and re-organizing your animation loop to not create a new function each iteration. It's entirely possible you're losing your scope somewhere.

Use

In terms of Big-O time, no, since both methods are O(n).

In the first loop, you iterate less times but do more calculations per iteration. In the second loop, you do less calculations per iteration but do more iterations overall. I wouldn't expect there to be any huge performance difference between the two, and the compiler might even change the two to be the same if you step through the assembly code.

It would also depend on the caching scheme your CPU is using, since in a large enough array the first loop may cache two blocks of memory rather than the second which would only cache one. This could have adverse effects on a direct-mapped cache, since the high and low indexes might refer to memory locations that occupy the same cache block, so accessing one after the other would result in constant cache misses.

At this point, it really is just up to what is more clear about what you are trying to accomplish, so I'd recommend loop #2. Not to mention, the second approach is far less error prone.

You can try,

• $group by null, get totalCount with $sum, and get failedCount on the base of $cond (condition) if inspectionIsFailed id True then return 1 and sum other wise 0
• $project to get ratio using $divide