asyncpool | Asyncio coroutine worker pool | Reactive Programming library
kandi X-RAY | asyncpool Summary
kandi X-RAY | asyncpool Summary
Asyncio coroutine worker pool. No more juggling bounded semaphores and annoying timeouts, and allows you to run through millions of pieces of data efficiently. Adapted from the awesome worker pool found at
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Start a worker thread
- Push an item to the pool
- Read the result from the queue
- Returns a naive datetime object
asyncpool Key Features
asyncpool Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on asyncpool
QUESTION
This question is different from this one Difference between Java8 thenCompose and thenComposeAsync because I want to know what is the writer's reason for using thenCompose
and not thenComposeAsync
.
I was reading Modern Java in action and I came across this part of code on page 405:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Aug-04 at 13:31TL;DR It is correct to use thenCompose
instead of thenComposeAsync
here, but not for the cited reasons. Generally, the code example should not be used as a template for your own code.
This chapter is a recurring topic on Stackoverflow for reasons we can best describe as “insufficient quality”, to stay polite.
In general, a method without the Async suffix in its name executes its task in the same threads the previous task, …
There is no such guaranty about the executing thread in the specification. The documentation says:
- Actions supplied for dependent completions of non-async methods may be performed by the thread that completes the current CompletableFuture, or by any other caller of a completion method.
So there’s also the possibility that the task is performed “by any other caller of a completion method”. An intuitive example is
QUESTION
I have written code for async pool below. in __aexit__
i'm cancelling the _worker tasks after the tasks get finished. But when i run the code, the worker tasks are not getting cancelled and the code is running forever. This what the task looks like: wait_for=>
. The asyncio.wait_for
is getting cancelled but not the worker tasks.
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Aug-26 at 02:44When you have an asyncio
task created and then cancelled, you still have the task alive that need to be "reclaimed". So you want to await worker
for it. However, once you await
such a cancelled task, as it will never give you back the expected return value, the asyncio.CancelledError
will be raised and you need to catch it somewhere.
Because of this behavior, I don't think you should gather
them but to await
for each of the cancelled tasks, as they are supposed to return right away:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install asyncpool
You can use asyncpool like any standard Python library. You will need to make sure that you have a development environment consisting of a Python distribution including header files, a compiler, pip, and git installed. Make sure that your pip, setuptools, and wheel are up to date. When using pip it is generally recommended to install packages in a virtual environment to avoid changes to the system.
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page