LD-Net | Efficient Contextualized Representation | Natural Language Processing library

by LiyuanLucasLiu Python Version: Current License: Apache-2.0

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(4)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | LD-Net Summary

LD-Net is a Python library typically used in Artificial Intelligence, Natural Language Processing, Deep Learning, Pytorch applications. LD-Net has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has low support. However LD-Net build file is not available. You can download it from GitHub.

Efficient Contextualized Representation: Language Model Pruning for Sequence Labeling

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

LD-Net has a low active ecosystem.

It has 148 star(s) with 14 fork(s). There are 10 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 6 months.

There are 3 open issues and 7 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 1 days. There are no pull requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of LD-Net is current.

Quality

LD-Net has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

Security

LD-Net has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

LD-Net code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.

There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

License

LD-Net is licensed under the Apache-2.0 License. This license is Permissive.

Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

Reuse

LD-Net releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.

LD-Net has no build file. You will be need to create the build yourself to build the component from source.

It has 2014 lines of code, 129 functions and 26 files.

It has medium code complexity. Code complexity directly impacts maintainability of the code.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi has reviewed LD-Net and discovered the below as its top functions. This is intended to give you an instant insight into LD-Net implemented functionality, and help decide if they suit your requirements.

Forward forward computation
Set batch sequence size
Forward computation
Set the batch sequence size
Prune dense layer
Prune rnn
Encodes a dataset into a dataset
Encodes a dataset
Calculate the score of a sequence model
Decodes the given scores
Reset the model
Calculate F1 score
Convert sequence to spans
Evaluate an instance
Get a tqdm progress bar
Generator for the reader
Open the next batch
Shuffle shuffle
Evaluate the model
Initialize the embedding
The regularizer
The proximal prox of the network

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

LD-Net Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for LD-Net.

LD-Net Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for LD-Net.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on LD-Net

How to specify minimum required version for application in msbuild cmd

Install F# 4.5 to Docker Container

From a ByteBuddy-generated method, how do I set a (public) instance field in an object received as an argument to the return value of a MethodCall?

Are ByteBuddy's field setting checks too strict?

QUESTION

How to specify minimum required version for application in msbuild cmd

Asked 2022-Jan-19 at 02:35

When we publish application from visual studio publish option using clickonce, there is option to add "Minimum required version" as below.

I am publishing my application using msbuild command and I want to pass "Minimum Required Version" to command. I tried to find out for this, but couldn't get any option to pass.

One possible way is to add this value in csproj file as below

But I want to pass to msbuild command. I am referring this article for msbuild commands

How can I pass minimum required version to msbuild command?

...

ANSWER

Answered 2022-Jan-19 at 02:35

I have figure out this problem

To add minimum required version, we need to mention MinimumRequiredVersion=xxxx along with UpdateRequired=true

so final command would be as below

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70740505

QUESTION

Install F# 4.5 to Docker Container

Asked 2021-May-21 at 17:29

I require the use of F# 4.5 running on the .NET Framework (not .NET Core). I would like this environment running in a docker container as it'll run periodically on our Jenkins build server. I thought that I could use the existing .NET Framework SDK Image but it only has F# for .NET Core/.NET 5.

So I attempted to install F# into the running container (should that work, I would add it to the image itself) but I am not having any luck. Here was my attempt...

Create a project folder
Download vs_BuildTools.exe to project
Create a Dockerfile using the .NET Framework SDK 4.8 image
...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-May-21 at 17:29

TLDR

I was able to solve the issue by installing the F# Compiler Tools using paket. The F# Compiler Tools for F# 4.5 runs on .NET Framework (or or mono) unlike F# 5 which runs on .NET Core (or .NET 5).

DETAILS Create the Dockerfile

My Dockerfile doesn't look too much different from before. I still base it on the Microsoft .NET Framework SDK 4.8 image as I want access to the .NET SDK.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67479997

QUESTION

From a ByteBuddy-generated method, how do I set a (public) instance field in an object received as an argument to the return value of a MethodCall?

Asked 2020-Nov-02 at 08:44

I am generating a class in ByteBuddy.

As part of one method implementation, I would like to set a (let's just say) public instance field in another object to the return value of a MethodCall invocation. (Keeping the example public means that access checks etc. are irrelevant.)

I thought I could use MethodCall#setsField(FieldDescription) to do this.

But from my prior question related to this I learned that MethodCall#setsField(FieldDescription) is intended to work only on fields of the instrumented type, and, looking at it now, I'm not entirely sure why or how I thought it was ever going to work.

So: is there a way for a ByteBuddy-generated method implementation to set an instance field of another object to the return value of a method invocation?

If it matters, the "instrumented method" (in ByteBuddy's terminology) accepts the object whose field I want to set as an argument. Naïvely I'd expect to be able to do something like:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-Nov-02 at 08:44

This is not possible as of Byte Buddy 1.10.18, the mechanism was originally created to support getters/setters when defining beans, for example. That said, it would not be difficult to add; I think it would even be easiest to allow any custom byte code to be dispatched as a consumer of the method call.

I will look into how this can be done, but as a new feature, this will take some time before I find the empty space to do so. The change is tracked on GitHub.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64625192

QUESTION

Are ByteBuddy's field setting checks too strict?

Asked 2020-Oct-31 at 13:15

I am using MethodCall.setsField() to try to set an instance field on another instance.

My generated class that is doing the field-setting, GC, is trying to set the value of an instance field in an instance of something it has created (CI). So the field's declaring type is CI; my field-setting code resides in GC (which is in the same package as CI but otherwise unrelated to it).

The ByteBuddy checks seem to indicate that although GC and CI are in the same package, GC must be assignable to CI in order to set this field! That greatly surprised me, but I am not a bytecode expert, and I might very well be overlooking something obvious. Could someone kindly explain why this check is necessary?

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-Oct-31 at 13:15

The method call sets the field implicitly on the this instance on which the method is invoked. For this to be possible, a non-static field must be declared by a super type of the type on which the method is invoked.

If you think this is too strict, please file an issue with an example of the code you are trying to generate, including the code to generate it which is currently failing. Maybe I am not thinking straight about this and if there's a restriction to be lifted, I would surely do it.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64582521

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install LD-Net

You can download it from GitHub.
You can use LD-Net like any standard Python library. You will need to make sure that you have a development environment consisting of a Python distribution including header files, a compiler, pip, and git installed. Make sure that your pip, setuptools, and wheel are up to date. When using pip it is generally recommended to install packages in a virtual environment to avoid changes to the system.

Support

For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .

Find more information at: