pkce | Simple Python module to generate PKCE code verifier | Code Coverage Tools library
kandi X-RAY | pkce Summary
kandi X-RAY | pkce Summary
Simple Python module to generate PKCE code verifier and code challenge.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Generate a Pkce pair
- Returns a base64 encoded code challenge
- Generate a valid code verification code
pkce Key Features
pkce Examples and Code Snippets
>>> import pkce
>>> code_verifier, code_challenge = pkce.generate_pkce_pair()
>>> import pkce
>>> code_verifier = pkce.generate_code_verifier(length=128)
>>> code_challenge = pkce.get_code_challenge(code_
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on pkce
QUESTION
I'm trying to make a login with Next Auth. I have given all necessary access data in a .env.local.
See here:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Apr-02 at 11:08I solved it by putting '
around THE GOOGLE_CLIENT_ID and around the GOOGLE_CLIENT_SECRET in the .env.local.
For example GOOGLE_CLIENT_ID = '[id comes here]'
QUESTION
I use Qt5. I did not find any documentation on how to enable PKCE when using QOAuth2AuthorizationCodeFlow.
If so, please provide the link. If there is no support, how can this feature be added to it?
I added code_challenge
and code_challenge_method
, but it is not enough. I don't know what the next step is.
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-15 at 12:34TL;DR Yes, and you are using it.
Reading the new flow you notice there are three new parameters used by PKCE, code_verifier
, code_challenge
and code_challenge_method
.
These are used in your code, so you are using PKCE already.
QUESTION
I am looking for some clarification as for how exactly to proceed with Oauth auth code PKCE grant when it comes to authorizing my own SPA.
So I get this when I am redirected from my SPA to backend (after I log in of course):
Now I get this, makes sense if I want to login into my app with google or twitter for example.
But If I want to log in to the backend app to get the token with my SPA - is there a way to avoid that every time a user logs in? Does it make sense?
I would like to have it from user perspective like this:
- click login
- redirect to backend pretending to be SPA (visually)
- login
- go straight back to SPA without having to confirm that stuff
I just mainly want to understand the process for SPA. I assume and suspect that what I want is simply not possible?
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-15 at 22:38Yes you can :)
Create your own Passport client.
QUESTION
I am working on a simple web app for learning purposes using Angular for the frontend and Java Spring for the backend. I don't have a particular problem that I want you guys to help me out with, instead I have a question about OAuth2 authentication.
I have registered my Angular SPA in Azure AD (Authorization Code Flow + PKCE), I set up roles and everything is working okay. My question is what do I do when authenticated users ping my backend? My backend has no information about the users.
I thought of a solution to make a web filter, and every time an authenticated user pings any endpoint requiring the user to be authenticated, to check the database if the user exists (through the username), and save him if he does not exist. I'm pretty sure this will work, but I don't think this is the best solution, considering my web filter will have to read from the databases for every single HTTP request that comes in, and write to the database occasionally (if the user logs in for the first time).
I shouldn't be worried about performance issues because I'm building this strictly for learning purposes, but nevertheless I want to do this the right way. I tried googling this in multiple ways, but I guess I'm not using the right keywords to find what I'm looking for. Any opinion or advice would be much appreciated! Thanks!
EDIT: I followed this article to achieve the OAuth2 + OIDC authentication and authorization, my security config in the backend is the same: https://ordina-jworks.github.io/security/2020/08/18/Securing-Applications-Azure-AD.html
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-10 at 15:47Post the discussion with clarity on the requirements. If you want to use have the following:
- Accept an Azure AD logged in user to consumer your web service
- You would want to check if the user exists in your application database with minimal network latency.
With the requirement of not always hitting your Database, one option is to use a cache.
The ideal solution for this cache to work is:
- Ensure the cache is checked for every HTTP Request using Web Filter
- Make sure the cache is always updated with the latest users being logged in via Azure AD
Example:
Implement a CacheService.java
QUESTION
I'm trying to set up a Vue3 SPA with a NestJS API in the back. I set up my Auth0 tenant and client to integrate with the SPA and plan to send the resulting JWTs to my API. In my SPA, I use the vue-auth0-plugin, which uses @auth0/auth0-spa-js under the hood.
I have successfully set up the Auth Code with PKCE flow, up to the point where I receive id, access and refresh tokens. However, something is wrong with the access token and I cannot understand why it is happening. The payload is invalid JSON and the token contains 2 consecutive .
. When I paste the token into jwt.io, the header is decoded as follows:
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-09 at 17:19As Gary said, the token is in JWE format. According to this Auth0 community post, the solution to the missing payload is to provide an audience
parameter. You should be able to include that parameter in the query string to the /authorize
endpoint.
QUESTION
Considering Authorization Code Flow with PKCE inside an iframe as follows:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-02 at 08:21If you don't want to use any backend to keep the code verifier, you can utilise session storage. Local storage will be blank when you come back from the Authorization Server to your SPA, but data in session storage will still be available, as long as you stay on the same tab.
QUESTION
I understand the Oauth code flow which involves the mobile app, app server, auth server, resource server. The app server is registered with auth server using the clientidand secret. The idea being that mobile app calls an endpoint of the app server which triggers the code flow eventually resulting in callback from the auth server to the app server with the auth code. The app server presents the secret and code to auth server to get the access token.
The other legacy option where there is no clientid and secret is the implicit flow wherein the mobile app receives the redirect url with the auth code (assuming redirect url destination is a SPA) which will invoke auth server endpoint to get the access token.
This is insecure because anyone can steal the access code from the url.
The solution to this for clients like mobile app is to use pkce. A random number hash is sent in the initial request which is verified later on when the auth code is passed to retrieve the access token.
This prevents the compromise of the access code from the url if an attacker is snooping because without initial hash the auth code is useless.
However how can the situation where the mobile phone is hacked and the secret and auth code is recorded by an attacker be handled to prevent misuse?
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-07 at 13:59These are the standard options:
PKCE uses a different code_verifier and code_challenge for every login attempt. If an authorization code is somehow captured from the system browser by an attacker it cannot be exhanged for tokens. No client secret is used, since a mobile app is a public client.
Use HTTPS redirect URIs (based on mobile deep links) so that if an attacker steals your client_id and redirect_uri they cannot receive the response containing the authorization code and will not be able to get tokens.
See this previous answer of mine for some further details, though claimed HTTPS schemes are tricky to implement.
Of course if an attacker has full control over a device, including authentication factors such as autofilled passwords, there may still be attack vectors
QUESTION
I try to create a tweet using tweepy under OAuth 2.0 instead of OAuth 1.0a. In other words, I am looking for an OAuth 2.0 equivalent of the following code.
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-07 at 04:03A solution is found.
QUESTION
I am new to the OAuth world and I am trying to understand the benefits of using PKCE over traditional Authorization code grant. (Many of my assumptions could be wrong, so I would thank for your corrections.)
I am a mobile app developer and according to OAuth documentation, client secrets can't be hardcoded in public clients' app code. The reason to avoid hardcoding the client secret is that a hacker could decompile my app and get my client secret.
The hacker with my client secret and my redirect_url, could develop a fake application. If a final user (User1) downloads the real application and the hacker's application (both), the fake application could listen to the real application callback and get the authorization code from it. With the authorization code (from the callback) and the client secret (stolen by decompiling my app), the hacker could get the authorization token and the refresh token and be able to get for example User1's data.
If other users download the real and the fake application, their data would also be in danger. Am I right? Would the hacker need both or could he/she do an attack only with the authorization code? Does the fifth step of the image requires the client secret and authorization code?
The attack is called interception attack.
To solve the the problem of hardcoding client secrets in the public client app and make it impossible for hackers to get the client secret and steal tokens, PKCE was invented. With PKCE, the client app code doesn't need to have the client secret hardcoded as PKCE doesn't need that information to get the tokens of the final users.
The PKCE flow creates a random string, transforms it to a SHA-256 hash value and to Base64. In the second point of the image, that encoded string is sent to the authentication server with the client id. Then the authorization code is sent in the callback and if any malicious app intercepts the code, it wouldn't be able to get the tokens as the fifth point of the image needs the original random string that was created by the legitimate app.
That is great, but if the client secret isn't need any more to get the tokens to access User1 data, how can I avoid a hacker developing a fake app which use PKCE flow with my client id and getting the tokens of the users who think that app is the legitimate one?
As the fifth step of the image don't need any more the client secret to get the tokens, anyone could develop fake apps using my public client id, and if any user downloads the fake app and do the OAuth flow, the hacker could get its tokens and access that users data!
Am I right?
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-29 at 21:21if the client secret isn't need anymore to get the tokens to access User1 data, how can I avoid a hacker developing a fake App which use PKCE flow with my client id and getting the tokens of the users who think that app is the legitimate one?
OAuth 2.0 or PKCE does not protect against "fake apps".
The PKCE does protect against having a malicious app on the device to steal a token that is intended for another app. E.g. think of a Bank app, it is not good if another app on the device can get the token that the Bank app is using. That is the case illustrated in your picture and that PKCE mitigates against.
As the 5th step of the image don't need anymore the client secret to get the tokens, anyone could develop fake apps using my public client id.
A mobile app cannot protect a client secret, similarly to JavaScript Single Page Applications. Therefore these clients are Public Clients rather than Confidential Clients according to OAuth 2.0. Only Confidential Clients can protect a client secret in a secure way, only those should use client secrets. PKCE is a good technique for Public Clients but might be used for Confidential Clients as well.
if any user downloads the fake app and do the oauth flow, the hacker could get it's tokens and access that users data!
Contact Apple Store or Google Play store for "fake apps", or use e.g. Anti-malware applications. That is the mitigations against "fake apps". PKCE only mitigates the case when another app on the same device try to steal the token that is issued for another app (e.g. a bank app).
QUESTION
Here is the error that I get once I run the application.
ERROR in ./node_modules/@okta/okta-react/bundles/okta-react.esm.js 284:14-27
export ‘useRouteMatch’ (imported as ‘useRouteMatch’) was not found in ‘react-router-dom’ (possible exports: BrowserRouter, HashRouter, Link, MemoryRouter, NavLink, Navigate, Outlet, Route, Router, Routes, UNSAFE_LocationContext, UNSAFE_NavigationContext, UNSAFE_RouteContext, createRoutesFromChildren, createSearchParams, generatePath, matchPath, matchRoutes, renderMatches, resolvePath, unstable_HistoryRouter, useHref, useInRouterContext, useLinkClickHandler, useLocation, useMatch, useNavigate, useNavigationType, useOutlet, useOutletContext, useParams, useResolvedPath, useRoutes, useSearchParams)
Here is what my code looks like in my Index.tsx file.
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-28 at 16:31I will go on a hunch and assume that you use newer react-router version than v5.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install pkce
You can use pkce like any standard Python library. You will need to make sure that you have a development environment consisting of a Python distribution including header files, a compiler, pip, and git installed. Make sure that your pip, setuptools, and wheel are up to date. When using pip it is generally recommended to install packages in a virtual environment to avoid changes to the system.
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page