Resound | Python audio clip | Speech library

 by   cgearhart Python Version: 1.2 License: CC0-1.0

kandi X-RAY | Resound Summary

kandi X-RAY | Resound Summary

Resound is a Python library typically used in Artificial Intelligence, Speech applications. Resound has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has build file available, it has a Permissive License and it has low support. You can install using 'pip install Resound' or download it from GitHub, PyPI.

Resound is a python library containing a single module for generating fingerprint hashes from audio files based on the algorithm described in the paper "An Industrial-Strength Audio Search Algorithm" and used in the Shazam app.
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              Resound has a low active ecosystem.
              It has 9 star(s) with 3 fork(s). There are 2 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 12 months.
              Resound has no issues reported. There are no pull requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of Resound is 1.2

            kandi-Quality Quality

              Resound has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

            kandi-Security Security

              Resound has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.
              Resound code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.
              There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

            kandi-License License

              Resound is licensed under the CC0-1.0 License. This license is Permissive.
              Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              Resound releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.
              Deployable package is available in PyPI.
              Build file is available. You can build the component from source.
              Installation instructions, examples and code snippets are available.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi has reviewed Resound and discovered the below as its top functions. This is intended to give you an instant insight into Resound implemented functionality, and help decide if they suit your requirements.
            • Extract peaks from a spectrogram
            • Generate a spectrogram of a time series
            • Extract peaks from a specgram
            • Generate hashes of peaks
            • Calculate the hash of two bits
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            Resound Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for Resound.

            Resound Examples and Code Snippets

            Resound,Using Resound
            Pythondot img1Lines of Code : 6dot img1License : Permissive (CC0-1.0)
            copy iconCopy
            import resound
            
            from scipy.io import wavfile
            
            sample_rate, data = wavfile.read('filename.wav')
            hashes = list(resound.hashes(data, freq=sample_rate))
              
            Resound,Installation
            Pythondot img2Lines of Code : 2dot img2License : Permissive (CC0-1.0)
            copy iconCopy
            $pip install resound
            
            $git submodule add https://github.com/cgearhart/Resound.git
              
            Resound,Testing
            Pythondot img3Lines of Code : 1dot img3License : Permissive (CC0-1.0)
            copy iconCopy
            $python -m unittest discover
              

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            Might GC.Collect() be warranted in this particular case?
            Asked 2021-Feb-24 at 14:54

            Disclaimer: Yes, I know that the general answer to whether or not to use GC.Collect() is a resounding "NO!". This is the first time in several years of programming that I ever consider using it at all.

            Well then, here's the situation: We have developed a C# scripting tool based on the Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Scripting libraries (v3.6.0). It's a Winform GUI with editor etc., not unlike others out there. We use it for the validation of integrated circuits, meaning that its primary task is interfacing lab equipment such as power supplies, pattern generators, meters and the like. For the communication to said instruments we predominantly rely on National Instrument's VISA framework, albeit not exclusively. Some devices are controlled directly via DLLs from their respective manufacturers. In general, this system is working beautifully and by now it is successfully used by quite a lot of design engineers who do not know the first thing about the intricacies of .NET and C#.

            At this point I should explain that the user can simply write a method (i.e. on "top-level") and then execute it. The Roslyn-part behind this is that the input is fed to CSharpScript.Create() and then compiled. The execution of a method is done via Script.ContinueWith("method name"). Inside of such a method the user can construct an object like, say, new VISA("connection string"), which connects to the device and then communicate with the device via this object. Nothing forces him or her to care about disposing the object (i.e. closing the connection).

            Now, the problem is this: recently, very sporadic crashes of the GUI application have occurred with no feedback at all from the system - the form just closes and that's it. By trial-and-error we are currently 99% sure that if all connection objects are explicitely disposed within a method, the crashes do not occur. So, rewriting the method to something like this fixes the problem:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Feb-24 at 14:54

            Short answer: No. It's not only not warranted, it's completely missing the actual issue.

            Further explanation: @canton7 instantly hit the nail on the head when writing

            I'd argue that your application shouldn't crash even if a finalizer does end up being called

            The root issue hid inside a 3rd party DLL in form of an, at the very least, suboptimal implementation of IDisposable. Once I zoomed in on that, it was rather easy to produce a workaround for that.

            My original question is so very misguided that I'd like to state the one that I should have asked: How do I trace a crash of my C# application when my application's logging does not show anything? This question has been answered comprehensively in a number of posts. In my case, the crash could be seen in the Windows event log.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66158319

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install Resound

            The easiest way to to install resound is the pip utility. It can also be installed as a submodule in another git repository (provided it has access to Numpy at runtime).

            Support

            For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
            Install
          • PyPI

            pip install Resound

          • CLONE
          • HTTPS

            https://github.com/cgearhart/Resound.git

          • CLI

            gh repo clone cgearhart/Resound

          • sshUrl

            git@github.com:cgearhart/Resound.git

          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link