intra | Search inside of long documents | Natural Language Processing library

My problem is very similar to: R: Count occurrences of value in multiple columns

However, the solution proposed there doesn't work for me because in the same row the value may appear twice but I want to count only the rows where this appears. I have worked out a solution but it seems too long:

I am converting some old mjpeg videos (stored in .avi container) to h.265 (.mp4 container) but am noticing the colors are smearing. Using the terminal command:

ffmpeg -y -i "input-file.avi" -c:v libx265 -vtag hvc1 "output-file.mp4"

I get the following image (notice how the red and blue are stretched donward). There is a lot of motion in the scene, but the motion is mostly horizontal:

Any idea what might cause this? The detail and resolution seem fine, just the colors are being interpreted weirdly.

Full output:

I converted an avi file to a mp4 file with the following command, but the converted mp4 file produced no audio when played with QuickTime (no such problem with other players). I was able to convert mkv to mp4 with the same command without the audio problem.

My table source:

The Column data types are:

I'm working with SSIS to load my destination table.

So, I want to change TYPE for

• Normal if 1
• Divers if 2
• Intra-Société if 3
• Prospect if 4

Also, to change actif to:

• no if 1
• yes if 2

Also, get the seniority from the date

So, I created a Derived Column transformation with 3 columns as follows:

Type Column

We use Artifactory as a hub for all external docker registries. We have different enviornments, all pull form the same url https://docker.intra. We suddenly have one case where a certain image is not pulled anymore but get this error

I've got a CASE statement that works, but because I have to do it in SSIS, I am at a loss:

Using Linux bash command line, I need to merge two filles integrating several copies of the file1 inside the specified part of the file 2. The file 1 looks like:

Is it possible to separate out the feature of an RTK-based application that depend on different slices of a the redux store into separate node packages? Assuming so, what is the best way to do that?

We have a large, and growing, app that is based around Redux Toolkit. Where possible we try to separate parts of the application into their own node packages. We find there are a lot of benefits to doing this, including:

• Maintainability of codebase
• Fine-grained control over intra-application dependencies
• Testability

It's easy enough to do this for cross-cutting things, like logging, http requests, routing, etc. But we would like to go further and modularize the "features" of our app. For example, have the "address book" feature of our application live in a different module than, say, the "messages" feature, with them all composed together via an "app" package.

The benefits we see here are ones we have found in other codebases and have been discussed in other places. (E.g., here for iOS). But, in brief: (1) you can see and control intra-app dependencies. For example, you can easily see if the "messages" feature depends on the "address book" feature and make explicit decisions about how you will expose the one feature to the other via what you export; (2) you can build fully testable sub-parts of the app by simply having a "preview" package that only composes in the things you want to test, e.g., you could have a "contact app" package that only depends on the "contact" feature for building and testing just that; (3) you can speed up CI/CD times by not needing to compile (TS/babel), pack/minify, and unit test every part; (4) you can utilize various analytics tools to get more fine-grained pictures of how each feature is developing.

There may well be other ways to achieve these things, and some may disagree with the premise that this is a good way to do it. That's not the focus of the question, but I'm open to the possibility it may be the best answer (e.g., some one with significant Redux experience may explain why this is a bad idea).

We've struggled to come up with a good way to do this with Redux Toolkit. The problem seems to boil down to -- is there a good way to modularize (via separate node packages) the various "slices" used in RTK? (This may apply to other Redux implementations but we are heavily invested in RTK).

It's easy enough to have a package that exports the various items that will be used by the redux store, i.e., the slice state, action creators, async thunks, and selectors. And RTK will then compose those very nicely in the higher-level app. In other words, you can easily have an "app" package that holds the store, and then a "contacts" package that exports the "contacts" slice, with its attendant actions, thunks, selectors, etc.

The problem comes if you also want the components and hooks that use that portion of slice to live in the same package as the slice, e.g., in the "contacts" package. Those components/hooks will need access to the global dispatch and the global useSelector hook to really work, but that only exists in the "app" component, i.e., the feature that composes together the various feature packages.

1. We could export the global dispatch and useSelector from the "higher" level "app" package, but then our sub-components now depend on the higher level packages. That means we can no longer build alternate higher level packages that compose different arrangements of sub packages.

2. We could use separate stores. This has been discussed in the past regarding Redux and has been discouraged, although there is some suggestion it might be OK if you are trying to achieve modularization. These discussions are also somewhat old.

Is it possible to separate out the feature of an RTK-based application that depend on different slices of a the redux store into separate node packages? Assuming so, what is the best way to do that?

While I'm primarily interested if if/how this can be done in RTK, I'd also be interested in answers--especially from folks with experience with RTK/redux on large apps--as to whether this is Bad Idea and what other approaches are taken to achieve the benefits of modularization.

I got a heap runtime error. I suspect that it is a compiler bug when it use move too excessively. A simplified version of the code is