pvc | Python vSphere Client with a dialog interface

 by   dnaeon Python Version: Current License: Non-SPDX

kandi X-RAY | pvc Summary

kandi X-RAY | pvc Summary

null

Python vSphere Client with a dialog(1) interface
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
            Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of pvc
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            pvc Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for pvc.

            pvc Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for pvc.

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            Cannot bind PersistentVolumeClaim to PersistentVolume in namespace
            Asked 2021-Jun-15 at 09:52

            I am trying to install jenkins on my kubernetes cluster under jenkins namespace. When I deploy my pv and pvc, the pv remains available and does not bind to my pvc.

            Here is my yamls:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Jun-15 at 09:52

            Based on the storage class spec, I think the problem is the volumeBindingMode being set as WaitForFirstConsumer which means the PV will remain unbound until there is a Pod to consume it.

            You can change it Immediate to allow the PV to be bound immediately without requiring to create a Pod.

            You can read about the different volume binding modes in detail in the docs.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67972725

            QUESTION

            PVCs not created at all after deletion, when using Retail reclaim policy in corresponding StorageClass
            Asked 2021-Jun-14 at 15:38

            I am using the ECK operator, to create an Elasticsearch instance.

            The instance uses a StorageClass that has Retain (instead of Delete) as its reclaim policy.

            Here are my PVCs before deleting the Elasticsearch instance

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Jun-14 at 15:38

            with the hope that due to the Retain policy, the new pods (i.e. their PVCs would bind to the existing PVs (and data wouldn't get lost)

            It is explicitly written in the documentation that this is not what happens. the PVs are not available for another PVC after delete of a PVC.

            the PersistentVolume still exists and the volume is considered "released". But it is not yet available for another claim because the previous claimant's data remains on the volume.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67971628

            QUESTION

            AWS Kubernetes Persistent Volumes EFS
            Asked 2021-Jun-14 at 09:35

            I have deployed EFS file system in AWS EKS cluster after the deployment my storage pod is up and running.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Jun-11 at 11:21

            Kubernetes 1.20 stopped propagating selfLink.
            There is a workaround available, but it does not always work.

            After the lines

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67922679

            QUESTION

            How to Create Dynamic Form in React from following Json?
            Asked 2021-Jun-10 at 07:21

            Please give me an Idea how to use map() for below json and how to create dynamic form for this json. I m not getting how to use this json for create dynamic from in react-native

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Jun-10 at 07:21

            You can do it like this: First Loop over your JSON object

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67915698

            QUESTION

            when installing bitnami mongodb-sharded, i got error from PVCs: no persistent volumes available for this claim and no storage class is set
            Asked 2021-Jun-09 at 21:30

            I am trying to install my rancher(RKE) kubernetes cluster bitnami/mongodb-shared . But I couldn't create a valid PV for this helm chart.

            The error that I am getting: no persistent volumes available for this claim and no storage class is set

            This is the helm chart documentation section about PersistenceVolume: https://github.com/bitnami/charts/tree/master/bitnami/mongodb-sharded/#persistence

            This is the StorageClass and PersistentVolume yamls that I created for this helm chart PVCs':

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Jun-07 at 15:00

            The chart exposes two parameters that allow you to choose the StorageClass you want to use for your PVC(s) (otherwise it will use the 'default' one):

            • configsvr.persistence.storageClass
            • shardsvr.persistence.storageClass

            Find more information in the Parameters section of the README.md

            So basically you need to install the chart setting these parameters accordingly.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67862431

            QUESTION

            Openshift & OKD EFS Provisioner - existing directory (by defaullt pvc creates new directory in EFS)
            Asked 2021-Jun-07 at 20:48

            Is it possible via EFS provisioner to create PVC mounting to specific directory in the EFS. Current behaviour of the provisioner is that every time we use the storage class aws-efs it creates new sub directory in the EFS and pod was not able to see the existing directory in the EFS

            EFS provisioner setup is inherited from this https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.2/storage/persistent_storage/persistent-storage-efs.html

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Jun-07 at 20:48

            Solved by manually creating PVC and PV specifying existing EFS directory, storage class, nfs endpoint

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67806496

            QUESTION

            Can't expose Keycloak Server on AWS with Traefik Ingress Controller and AWS HTTPS Load Balancer
            Asked 2021-Jun-06 at 00:12

            I have successfully exposed two microservices on AWS with Traefik Ingress Controller and AWS HTTPS Load Balancer on my registered domain.

            Here is the source code: https://github.com/skyglass-examples/user-management-keycloak

            I can easily access both microservices with https url:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Jun-03 at 22:30

            Right - the admin console is listening on 127.0.0.1. This is not the outside world interface. This is "localhost".

            You have two choices here. You can start Keycloak with a command line argument like:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67828817

            QUESTION

            Default-scheduler 0/1 nodes are available: 1 node(s) didn't find available persistent volumes to bind
            Asked 2021-Jun-03 at 08:43

            I am trying to create some persistent space for my Microk8s kubernetes project, but without success so far.

            What I've done so far is:

            1st. I have created a PV with the following yaml:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Jun-03 at 08:43

            the issue is that you are using the node affinity while creating the PV.

            Which think something like you say inform to Kubernetes my disk will attach to this type of node. Due to affinity your disk or PV is attached to one type of specific node only.

            when you are deploying the workload or deployment (POD) it's not getting schedule on that specific node and your POD is not getting that PV or PVC.

            to resolve this issue

            make sure both POD and PVC schedule at same node add the node affinity to deployment also so POD schedule on that node.

            or else

            Remove the node affinity rule from PV and create a new PV and PVC and use it.

            here is the place where you have mentioned the node affinity rule

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67817865

            QUESTION

            Kubernetes Helm Elasticstack CrashLoopBackOff with JavaErrors in Log
            Asked 2021-May-28 at 12:29

            I'm trying to deploy the ELK stack to my developing kubernetes cluster. It seems that I do everything as described in the tutorials, however, the pods keep failing with Java errors (see below). I will describe the whole process from installing the cluster until the error happens.

            Step 1: Installing the cluster

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-May-26 at 05:06

            For the ELK stack to work you need all three PersistentVolumeClaim's to be bound as I recall. Instead of creating 1 30 GB of PV create 3 of the same size with the claims and then re-install. Other nodes have unmet dependincies.

            Also please do not handle the volumes by hand. There are guidelines to deploy dynamic volums. Use OpenEBS for example. That way you wont need to worry about the pvc's. After giving the pv's if anything happens write again with your cluster installation process.

            I was wrong obviously, in this particular problem, filesystems and cgroups take role and the main problem of this is an old problem. From 5.2.1 to 8.0.0. Reinstall the chart by pulling the chart. Edit values file and definitely change the container version. It should be fine or create another error log stack.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67618426

            QUESTION

            Grafana Pod is in Init Error state after adding an existing PVC
            Asked 2021-May-28 at 10:08

            Installing grafana using helm charts, the deployment goes well and the grafana ui is up, needed to add an existence persistence volume, ran the below cmd:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-May-23 at 05:42

            NFS turns on root_squash mode by default which functionally disables uid 0 on clients as a superuser (maps those requests to some other UID/GID, usually 65534). You can disable this in your mount options, or use something other than NFS. I would recommend the latter, NFS is bad.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67652819

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install pvc

            No Installation instructions are available at this moment for pvc.Refer to component home page for details.

            Support

            For feature suggestions, bugs create an issue on GitHub
            If you have any questions vist the community on GitHub, Stack Overflow.
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries