Manipulator | FreeCAD Manipulator WorkBench | 3D Printing library

So we figured it out.

We were using fetch-token-intercept which was adding our bearer token to calls going to expo, which meant validation was failing.

We modified the function to exclude calls to expo from including our bearer token and now the token is being retrieved successfully.

I'm actually doing this exact thing with ImagePicker in my app. Here's how I do it:

There are three main buffering strategies used for output streams:

1. No buffering - Every write to the stream is immediately written to the underlying output device.
2. Line buffering - Writes to the stream are stored in memory until a newline character is written or the buffer is full, at which point the buffer is flushed to the underlying output device.
3. Full buffering - Writes to the stream are stored in memory until the stream's internal buffer is full, at which point the buffer is flushed to the underlying output device.

why endl mainly affects the fully buffered streams

This should be fairly apparent from the descriptions above. If the stream is unbuffered then std::endl doesn't do any extra work; there is no buffer to flush. If the stream is line buffered, then writing a newline will flush the buffer anyway, so std::endl doesn't do anything extra. Only for a fully buffered stream does std::endl do any extra work.

how cout is not a fully buffered stream?

The C++ language doesn't specify the buffering strategy used for std::cout, but most implementations use either no buffering or line buffering when the program's standard output stream is hooked up to a terminal. If stdout is redirected to something else, like a file, many implementations will switch to using a fully buffered stream for std::cout.

It's hard to see exactly what is going on here because you didn't provide all of the relevant code. I suspect that the issue you encountered is around stringifying an object rather than getting the appropriate value off of it. Here's an example of ImagePicker and ImageManipulator integration: https://snack.expo.io/@brents/image-picker-and-manipulator

Since I cannot get a reference to the factory function from jest.mock() I can change the import expression of the file so that I can spy on all it's exported functions.

Well, you can not get the absent days from the biometric device. It must be part of your application logic. You have to read all the attendance data from the biometric device, and consider all the missing dates as absent days.

Its seems to be an closed issue, however I still experience this in SDK 40: https://github.com/software-mansion/react-native-screens/issues/214

Adding the style opacity: .99 to the webview prevents the crash on Android.

Solution by @Nick Prozee he got the issue from react-native-audio-record

Well basically that is a pain in the ***. What I did is outlined all my components 1 by 1 to narrow down which one was causing the error. This led me to the package react-native-audio-record. The problem is that the details you get from expo, are wrong, I did not find any logical way to approach this issue rather then outlining all of my code until error disappears

it has a bug in react native which is not resolved yet

https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/26813

can you try it with remote debugging mode? because it is working with remote debugging mode yet.

I can't think of a "right" way to manipulate the string as a reference inside the StringManipulatorViewModel, once you pass the string as a value it has nothing to do with the model.

But a way to legitimately change the model string value whenever the StringManipulatorViewModel manipulates it, is by raising an Event in the view model when it manipulates the string and then add an event handler to update the model with the new value: