fprint | Fancy printing in python | 3D Printing library

The error check in the GetStatus function is incorrect and you introduced a local variable that you are not using. Please fix the code as follows:

You can give a type annotation with a double colon:

I ended up with the following code which decodes a FLAC file to raw audio data using github.com/eaburns/flac (as Steven Penny pointed out) and then passes the data over to fingerprint/gochroma.

The resulting fingerprint doesn't seem to be the same as the one reported by fpcalc for the same FLAC file, but when querying the AcoustID database using the generated fingerprint, the result is correct.

I wasn't able to download buildings data from OSM with a polygon (shapefile) as the bounding box however I was able to using distance from a point with the following code:

You are reading from the standard input before you ever write to the ssh connection. As a result, this screen can only by skipped by manual intervention.

The reading of the command line's standard input should come after any initial commands you want to run on the host, so it would be organized like this:

Fully working example:

The interpreter does not know what type for f in foldl :: Foldable f => (a -> b -> a) -> a -> f b -> a to use, hence the error. This is important since the f here decides exactly what implementation for foldl it will use. Indeed for a f ~ Maybe the implementation can be different than for an f ~ [], so depending on the type for f, a different foldl is used.

If we specify the type, for example with [Int], or Maybe Char, this works (well it will raise an error, but this is because the undefined will of course not evaluate properly):

Slices are references to arrays. When modifying a slice without copying it, the underlaying array will be modified. Therefore, all slices that point to the same underlaying array will see this change.

You're pretty much correct about what's going on. Very interesting, I've never seen something like this before. But basically as you said, every time it calls the label, as you said, r9 keeps adding up until it reaches read, whose syscall number is 0. This is why the order is pretty clever. Assuming r9 is 0 before read is called (the read label itself zeroes r9 before calling the correct syscall), no adding is needed because r9 already has the correct syscall number that is needed. write's syscall number is 1, so it only needs to be added by 1 from 0, which is shown in the macro call. open's syscall number is 2, so first it is added by 1 at the open label, then again by 1 at the write label, and then the correct syscall number is put into rax at the read label. And so on. Parameter registers like rdi, rsi, rdx, etc. are also not touched so it basically acts like a normal function call.

Also how does the separate httpd.asm custom binary work? Just hand-optimized assembly combining the C source and start assembly?

I'm assuming you're talking about this file. Not sure exactly what's going on here, but it looks like an ELF file is manually being created, probably to reduce size further.