RTA | Red team Arsenal - An intelligent scanner | Security library

if your texto is coming in form of a list, you can access the items outrightly. Try this

The following code does what I want it to. There are still mistakes ("tokens=* delims= "), but these seem negligible - at least I hope so.

You can filter the menu items before mapping over them. You can use Array.prototype.includes to check if the menu item id exists in the arrIds array. If arrIds is falsy or is an empty array, you can return true to display all the menu items.

I think you can revamp your previous solution a bit to

Before I answer the question, it is important to understand the difference between synchronous and asynchronous functions in JavaScript.

Therefore, if you are new to JavaScript or asynchronous behaviours, I recommend you read up on this excellent answer and explanation about the topic

The problem here is that React's render() method is a synchronous method, meaning React expects a synchronous return value with jsx (or a React.Element for that matter).

For React, your current render function actually returns nothing or undefined, as you do not a have a synchronous return statement. And so nothing will get rendered.

React has no way of knowing when your callback is called or what it returns, as it is executed completely out of Reacts context.

The way to go here is to use Reacts state which is exactly for these kind of scenarios.

By using state and the method setState(), you can asynchrounously trigger the render-method to be called again as soon as the response from your API delivered the data. Also, with this.state, you can bring the response-data into the react-context and let it know about it.

A full example could look like this:

1. Point 1:- Just set the href value to "#"
2. Point 2:- Wrap your anchor inside a container div and in your jQuery append the container div id like below, so that it will only find anchor list which are under that container div.

I found a workaround using the fixest package, which yields almost identical estimates but lets me pass new data into the predict function. The code is identical to the one displayed above as both packages (fixest and alpaca) use the same feglm command for the estimation.

The result you showed - Megadott tranzakció azonosítóval már történt API hívás - is the UTF-8 encoded form of Megadott tranzakció azonosí­tóval már történt API hí­vás being misinterpreted in Latin-1/ISO-8859-1. Which most likely means that the response did not specify a UTF-8 charset in its Content-Type header (since you have an Intercept assigned, you can easily verify this for yourself), so Indy would fall back to a default charset instead.

The original UTF-8 bytes have been decoded and lost before you can access the response data in send_text or error_message. However, since ISO-8859-1 basically has a 1:1 relationship between byte values and Unicode codepoint values, what you can try doing in this specific situation is copy the ErrorMessage's Char values as-is to a RawByteString(65001) or UTF8String, and then let the RTL decode that as UTF-8 back into a proper UTF-16 (Unicode)String, eg:

Your problem arises due to different encodings when saving and reading the file. Generally if applicable, you should aim to always encode text files with UTF-8. This requires you to use a text editor that allows specifying the encoding the file should be saved with. Most code editors and IDEs do allow this. Even with Window Notepad you can explicitly specify the Encoding in the File > Save as... dialog.

Alternatively, you can enter your non-ASCII characters in the string with a Unicode escape sequence \uxxxx where xxxx is the hexadecimal value of the character's unicode code point (e. g. \u015f for ş). You'd need to individually look up the code point per character, either just with google or tools like the windows character map.