fusepy | Simple ctypes bindings for FUSE
kandi X-RAY | fusepy Summary
kandi X-RAY | fusepy Summary
Simple ctypes bindings for FUSE
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of fusepy
fusepy Key Features
fusepy Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on fusepy
QUESTION
I am using fusepy and I need to convert a file descriptor back in to a file object so that I can obtain the original file path
From the fusepy examples, when a file is created, a file descriptor is returned - for example:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Oct-03 at 12:58Since this seems to satisfy the need, I'll post it as an answer for the time being. One could access underlying objects through f.buffer
and f.buffer.raw
(not the surprise mentioned in question depends a bit on Python version used, in v2 this looked different), but that still won't help accessing the filename used top open the file. Note: this could have just as well taken place in a calling process and a descriptor could have been inherited by the python process.
Not sure if there is a nicer and more portable way, but one can query OS and on U*X like system a readily available way would be to reference procfs
structure, namely for the above example:
QUESTION
I tried to create a new installation of my codebase and am running into this issue. As best as possible, I have tried to verify that both installations have the same exact versions of all dependencies.
The issue only seems to strike on endpoints that access the database, although maybe that is just a coincidence and the issue is not at all DB related. (The DB is definitely functioning because the old install can still access it.)
Let me know if there is any other helpful info I can gather to help debug.
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Oct-04 at 06:43In your settings, you've set DEFAULT_FILTER_BACKENDS'
to ('rest_framework.filters.BaseFilterBackend',)
. Thus, BaseFilterBackend
is being applied to most your views* and is throwing the NotImplementedError
because BaseFilterBackend
is a baseclass that is not actually intended to be applied directly -- only to be overridden by you or inherited by other filters. You should remove it from your defaults and anywhere else you're using it.
*Except the ones that manually specify their filters via filter_backends
like you did in your sample view.
For example, the error can be resolved by replacing BaseFilterBackend
with DjangoFilterBackend
in the settings and in the view.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install fusepy
No Installation instructions are available at this moment for fusepy.Refer to component home page for details.
Support
If you have any questions vist the community on GitHub, Stack Overflow.
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page