rejected | rejected is a consumer framework for RabbitMQ | Pub Sub library
kandi X-RAY | rejected Summary
kandi X-RAY | rejected Summary
rejected is a consumer framework for RabbitMQ
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Reply to a message
- Publish a message to exchange
- Return channel name
- Create a pika BasicProperties object from a dictionary
- The message body
- Load BeautifulSoup value
- Decode value using bz2
- Decompress a gzip value
- Invoked when a channel is closed
- Called when a timer is received
- Add parser arguments
- Start the consumer
- Read requirements from requirements file
- Called when RabbitMQ is opened
- Called when the channel is open
- Invoked when a message is returned
- Invoked when a message is received
- Shut down the connection
- Deprecated Deprecated
- Set the value of a metric
- Set the value of a tag
- Deprecated Deprecated
- Process a SIGCHLD signal
- Deprecated function
- Deprecated for profiling
- Signal handler for SIGPROF
rejected Key Features
rejected Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on rejected
QUESTION
A static analysis tool I'm using prompts me that I need to std::forward the argument of the following function down the call chain:
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-21 at 13:17The relevant section is [temp.deduct.call]/1 [emphasis mine]:
Template argument deduction is done by comparing each function template parameter type (call it
P) that contains template-parameters that participate in template argument deduction with the type of the corresponding argument of the call (call itA) as described below. If removing references and cv-qualifiers fromPgivesstd::initializer_listorP′[N]for someP′andNand the argument is a non-empty initializer list ([dcl.init.list]), then deduction is performed instead for each element of the initializer list independently, takingP′as separate function template parameter typesP′iand thei:th initializer element as the corresponding argument. [...]
Meaning [temp.deduct.call]/3 does not apply for a P that was originally an array reference type (once it reaches /3, /3 applies per element).
However, if we return to the section above we may note that it comes with the restriction
[...] and the argument is a non-empty initializer list [...]
meaning a call, for OP's example function f, like
QUESTION
In the following program struct B defines two conversion operators: to A and to const A&. Then A-object is created from B-object:
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-07 at 22:51The implementation divergence is probably related to CWG 2327.
If look strictly at the wording of C++20, then GCC is right and the overload resolution is ambiguous. I'll go into the wording in detail first, and then at the end of the answer I'll discuss CWG 2327 again.
There are two candidates for the initialization:
QUESTION
Apple reviewer has just rejected my app since ATT request doesn't appear: "We are unable to locate the App Tracking Transparency permission request when reviewed on iOS 15.0.1."
My code is as shown below:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-02 at 21:43An Apple person suggests that you request it through applicationDidBecomeActive(_:) in AppDelegate. That's how I fixed the issue for iOS.
QUESTION
Discussion about this was started under this answer for quite simple question.
ProblemThis simple code has unexpected overload resolution of constructor for std::basic_string:
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-05 at 12:05Maybe I'm wrong, but it seems that last part:
QUESTION
struct A {
int i;
consteval A() { i = 2; };
consteval void f() { i = 3; }
};
constexpr bool g() {
A a;
a.f();
return true;
}
int main() {
static_assert(g());
}
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-12 at 16:20The rule is, from [expr.const]/13:
An expression or conversion is in an immediate function context if it is potentially evaluated and its innermost non-block scope is a function parameter scope of an immediate function. An expression or conversion is an immediate invocation if it is a potentially-evaluated explicit or implicit invocation of an immediate function and is not in an immediate function context. An immediate invocation shall be a constant expression.
Where, an immediate function is simply the term for (from [dcl.constexpr]/2):
A function or constructor declared with the
constevalspecifier is called an immediate function.
From the example:
QUESTION
I'm learning about different memory orders.
I have this code, which works and passes GCC's and Clang's thread sanitizers:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-04 at 16:06The thread sanitizer currently doesn't support std::atomic_thread_fence. (GCC and Clang use the same thread sanitizer, so it applies to both.)
GCC 12 (currently trunk) warns about it:
QUESTION
Today when I added a workflow and push the code to GitHub remote repo, shows this error:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Aug-17 at 05:15QUESTION
The following program makes the pointer x on function g() having automatically deduced return type:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-26 at 22:28This code
QUESTION
I have an application on play store to whom the targetSdkVersion is update to 30 from 29, which is getting rejected again and again by Google Play after an update.
Previously, there was a permission of MANAGE_EXTERNAL_STORAGE in one of the SDK Manifest.
After removing MANAGE_EXTERNAL_STORAGE permission and storage permission (WRITE_EXTERNAL_STORAGE) completely from my app, uploading the app on store, app update gets rejected again.
This is the email received from Google Play for the rejection reason.
Note: I am saving all my media files in app-specific internal storage.
Also, I have the permission of READ_EXTERNAL_STORAGE in my SDK as we have chat feature in our app to get images and videos of device to sent it.
According to Use of All files access (MANAGE_EXTERNAL_STORAGE) permission READ_EXTERNAL_STORAGE permission has not impact.
Update
I also removed READ_EXTERNAL_STORAGE permission from the app, but still got the rejection with same reason from Google Play.
Is the issue with Storage Policy, or something else?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-25 at 13:10I had the same error for a month but finally, Google Play Store accepted my uploads.
Briefly, what I did was to create new builds for each track, and -interestingly- it worked!
(Before my countless update trials, our latest version on Production was 2.23.5 (build 1), our active tracks were Internal Testing Track and Production, and I was trying to upload my updates to Internal Testing Track.)
Below are the steps that I've applied:
- Created a new build
2.24.1 (build 1)with all necessary changes. (e.g. upgradingtargetSdkVersionto 30, removingMANAGE_EXTERNAL_STORAGEpermission, etc.) - Activated our inactive tracks (Open, Closed Alpha, and Beta Testing Tracks), uploaded the same build
2.24.1 (build 1)to these tracks, and then paused those tracks. (I've paused them as I won't use them actively, you may not want to pause it) - Created another build
2.24.1 (build 2)which was completely the same as build 1. I've just updated its build number. - Uploaded
2.24.1 (build 2)to the Internal Testing Track. - Created another build
2.24.1 (build 3)which was completely the same as build 3. I've just updated its build number. - Uploaded
2.24.1 (build 3)to the Production Track. - Went to "Publishing Overview" page, activated Managed Publishing in order to manually publish my uploads to Production and other tracks as they got accepted.
- Sent these uploads to review at once and voila, Google accepts your uploads!
Sarcasm on.
Hereby, I would like to congratulate Google Play Support as they've shared all these details within their documentation, within their rejection e-mails, and within their super fast response to the appeal.
Sarcasm off.
I've found this solution referencing from this answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/69933431/2833718. I couldn't find any help from Google's official docs. They've always rejected my uploads with the same e-mail which is impossible to decode for a human being. They've never returned to my appeal.
This migration and support process was completely a failure.
Thank you Google Play Support, you are everything but support to developers.
QUESTION
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-09 at 15:49You should fix the xsd version to your matching spring-data-mongo version. (to prevent surprises and not "rely on the latest")
So:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install rejected
You can use rejected like any standard Python library. You will need to make sure that you have a development environment consisting of a Python distribution including header files, a compiler, pip, and git installed. Make sure that your pip, setuptools, and wheel are up to date. When using pip it is generally recommended to install packages in a virtual environment to avoid changes to the system.
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page
