autotrace | output along with other telemetry on the process | Runtime Evironment library
kandi X-RAY | autotrace Summary
kandi X-RAY | autotrace Summary
Runs a process, and gives you the output along with other telemetry on the process, all in one terminal window.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Handle keyboard input
- Quit the screen
- Show layout
- Returns the pane with the given session number
- Cycle through all the pane objects
- Reads all the queued sessions
- Read a single line from the process
- Write a message to the logfile
- Append an output line
- Parse command line arguments
- Clear the terminal screen
- Get the PID of the last process
- Collect all files in the specified directory
- Play a file
- Debugging function for debugging
- Refreshes the full screen
- Spawn the process
- Quits the autotrace
autotrace Key Features
autotrace Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on autotrace
QUESTION
I am having a hard time understanding why the Oracle CBO is behaving the way it does when a bind variable is part of a OR condition.
My environment
Oracle 12.2 over Red Hat Linux 7
HINT. I am just providing a simplification of the query where the problem is located
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-10 at 17:36From the execution plan the optimiser is, for some reason, re-evaluating the hierarchical query for every row in your table, and then using exists()
to see if that row's ID is in the result. It isn't clear why the or
is causing that. It might be something to raise with Oracle.
From experimenting I can see three ways to at least partially work around the problem - though I'm sure there are others. The first is to move the CSV expansion to a CTE and then force that to materialize with a hint:
QUESTION
My purpose is to write an insert statement that adds a random value from a given string, more specifically if the person is married, single or a widower. I needed to first populate my table with hundreds of random entries because I need to run Autotrace on it and check its optimization. In any event, I first created the table, then populated all the columns, except for the one concerning marital status. Then I wanted to write a different INSERT statement just for that because I thought it might be easier then putting it into the plSQL block I made to populate the table. Here is my code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-23 at 06:10If I understood you correctly, you don't need PL/SQL at all - everything can be done in a single insert
statement (or select
, if you prefer). Here's how:
QUESTION
I am working to further optimize the following query. I have already had a lot of success optimizing the query up to this point, but now I am looking for help from others for ideas. I appreciate your help.
The following query takes over 200 seconds to complete yet the two individual WITH clause queries (receiving_1 and receiving_2) that make up the "UNION ALL" take less than 4 seconds each.
- receiving_1 -- 58 recs in 3.4 secs; cost 295 (no UNION)
- receiving_2 -- 0 recs in 3.8 secs; cost 295 (no UNION)
- UNION ALL of 1+2 -- 58 recs in 203.1 secs; cost 300 (UNION ALL)
I was hoping "rownum" would help optimize the "UNION ALL", but it did not. This attempt was based on a note from AskTom --> Files --> SQLTechniques.zip (between 61 and 72)
When you have two queries that run light speed separately But not so together Generally a mixed “CBO/RBO” problem Use of RBO with a feature that kicks in the CBO Rownum can be a temporary fix till all things are CBO
NOTE: One optimization that avoids this issue is embedded replacement parameters or cursor parameters that greatly reduce the rows at key points in the query. However, because I need to run this query through a database link against a read-only database, the following options are not available for this query.
- dbms_sql over database link: query is too long; dbs_sql does not accept a lob over database link; also DBAs don't allow the running of any PL/SQL in the read-only database.
- pipelined function: pipelined function has known bug over database link between 19c and 11g so fails
- sys_refcursor via PL/SQL: cursors are not supported over database links
- set parameter values in PL/SQL package and use them in view: not allowed to execute any code in read-only database (I am still bugging the DBAs to allow this. This might be my best hope if I am not able to optimize the below query to run as a view.)
NOTE: In an attempt at providing a good test case with as little code as possible, the below SQL (4,584 chars, 88 line breaks) is a greatly simplified version of the actual SQL (93,683 chars, 2,014 line breaks) I am developing. The original SQL has already gone through several rounds of optimizations to bring the runtime down from over an hour to under 10 seconds. This latest challenge is that the SQL has to be rewritten as a view as opposed to a SQL file with embedded substitution parameters. The substitution parameters were key to the optimizations up to now. I am now refactoring the SQL to work as a view in Oracle 11gR2 to be called via a database link from Oracle 19c. A view has no parameters, obviously. The driving parameters (ledger, OU, period) will be WHERE
clause conditions when querying the view.
Big picture: The actual SQL under development is an amalgamation of 6 report queries that share a lot of duplicated code. My work is to convert all six source report queries into an efficient extract for importing into a new database schema for reconciliation purposes.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-10 at 08:03As I don't know the underlying tables, their structure and their data, I can only guess. Having said that, I'd try the following things (not knowing if any of the steps are helpful or not!):
remove the rownum from
receiving_all
add the
where
clause from the main query to each of the subqueries inreceiving_all
. The optimizer might be able to infer this, but I am not sure.change
union all
tounion
inreceiving_all
and remove thedistinct
fromreceiving_1
andreceiving_2
receiving_2
seems to be included inreceiving_2
?If 4. is not the case, I would combine both into a single query with
WHERE UPPER(bq.JE_CATEGORY) = UPPER('Receiving') AND ( () OR () )
I would try if
UPPER(bq.JE_CATEGORY)
can be avoided. Functions prevent index access.In case you can create tables, I'd unroll the values of
gccs
into two tables, one forsegment_1
, and another table forsegment_2
.If 7. is not an option, I'd add the hint
select /*+ materialize */ gcc.code_combination_id
togcc
.
I'm very curious to see which suggestion has any positive impact...
QUESTION
SQL Developer v 18.4
Problem: Autotrace not displaying executions statistics in SQL Developer
I think DBA gave me all the required privilege, I can select from views and autotrace (f6) works. But somehow still not able to see execution statistics at right bottom of SQL developer windows pane.
SELECT on below view works
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-06 at 18:26You'll need SELECT access on these VIEWs:
- V$SQL_PLAN_STATISTICS_ALL
- V$SQL
- V$STATNAME
- V$MYSTAT
- V$PARAMETER
What's executed to get the plan and session stats:
QUESTION
I'm analysing the performance of a query. The method I'm currently using is the below:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-02 at 16:16Use the type => 'text'
format to generate a SQL Monitoring Report that is smaller than the HTML version but contains the same data.
In my testing, the HTML format is 8.5 times larger than the text format. However, the HTML file was still only 175 kilobytes, which isn't likely to cause performance issues on most systems. But I still recommend using the text file anyway. The text output is easier to post and share, easier to compare using diff programs, and easier to understand (because for tricky plans you need to line up the operations exactly, which is easier to do in a text editor counting spaces than eyeballing a large HTML file.)
For example, the below never-ending query generates the below text and HTML output.
QUESTION
I hope anyone can help me. I am designing a model with some RTMV (Real Time Materialized Views) in Oracle 12.2. I create all the MV logs and define the refresh group as well as the jobs to do it. So far all good..
However the query that I need to run over them does not work because apparently using either DUAL
, REGEXP_SUBSTR
or CONNECT BY LEVEL
is not compatible with the hint FRESH_MV
. I need to use the hint because the query is done over the RTMVs, and that is the only way to get the real time data ( as far as I know ).
If the hint cannot be used, I would like to know how to rewrite the condition shown below in order to avoid using DUAL, CONNECT BY LEVEL and REGEXP_SUBSTR.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-04 at 02:32That CONNECT BY mechanism is a means to convert a comma delimited string into rows, eg
QUESTION
I'm new to Oracle and would like to know the way how to get more statistics in the case i'll describe below. I'm using SQL Developer.
First, I execute this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Dec-08 at 23:06That error is about sqlplus autotrace
, it's not about gathering system statistics like your linked post seems to be about.
There is a role created specifically for these grants called plustrace
https://docs.oracle.com/database/121/SQPUG/ch_eight.htm#SQPUG535
To use this feature, you must create a PLAN_TABLE table in your schema and then have the PLUSTRACE role granted to you. DBA privileges are required to grant the PLUSTRACE role. For information on how to grant a role and how to create the PLAN_TABLE table, see the Oracle Database SQL Language Reference.
QUESTION
i'm working with oracle pl/sql and i have a stored procedure with this query, and it is a bit convoluted, but it gets the job done, the thing is it takes like 35 minutes, and the sql developer Autotrace says that is doing a full scan even though the tables have their indexes.
So is there any way to improve this query?
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jun-26 at 20:10Most of the time the index has to match exactly what's in the WHERE clause to be eligible for use. An index on the acquirer_data column cannot be used when your WHERE clause says
QUESTION
I have to get the execution plan of a query, i did this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-May-13 at 14:09Yes, depending on your data volume in those tables having an index should help performance. You'll want to check if there is any referential integrity between your two joined tables.
You can check if any indexes are already created on the columns for the tables used in your SQL statement by running these queries, replacing with the database schema your tables reside in:
QUESTION
I'm having issues with spooling out results from queries, more or less it shows always no real cost, shows rows as one and no cost or anything added, and not the statistics of the actual query.
I'm using this setup:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Dec-03 at 14:01If you try running this in SQL*Plus:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
Install autotrace
You can use autotrace like any standard Python library. You will need to make sure that you have a development environment consisting of a Python distribution including header files, a compiler, pip, and git installed. Make sure that your pip, setuptools, and wheel are up to date. When using pip it is generally recommended to install packages in a virtual environment to avoid changes to the system.
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page