Writeups | Here I 'll post my CTF / IT-Security related writeups | Hacking library

So, Currently if suppose I have an article of around 1500 words and I don't wanna use telegra.ph, neither I want to send two messages to send the complete article.

I want to send the complete article in one message.

So for that, Can we group two messages with two different id's and link them through Inline Buttons - Next and Previous.

The next button will open the second message, and previous will return to the first.

Is it possible, How can I do it if it is. And Do anyone has a better idea if it isn't.

I am creating a group solely for writers. As stories, novels, articles, are some Times quite lengthy I want readers that feasibility to read such long writeups without having to go to Telegra.ph or reading multiple messages. Instead an ebook format for the readers to read the next page or chapter by just clicking the "Next" Inline button.

There has been a lot discussion about when and how to unsubscribe and that subscriptions shouldn't leak outside of a service. I have read many articles about this matter and I think I understood some parts, but what I'm missing in the writeups and tutorials if found, is what to do with the "new subscription pattern" we created.

So I will first explain from which concept I'm talking and put the question afterwards.

CONCEPT:

// some.component.ts (extremely simplified)

I'm planning to use GitHub pages to create a blog, including writeups of CTFs. Due to the terms of these, the writeups cannot be released until a specific date. I'm planning to have a master branch that is the one published on the site, but I'd also like an offline branch containing unpublished writeups, which should never touch the remote until merged into master. Is there a way to do this using Git/GitHub?

I use Mercurial named branches regularly for job and for hobbies, and I thought I understood them reasonably well. I also thought that I understood the differences between named and unnamed/anonymous branches. But a group at work has run into a problem that I admit has me a little stumped, and now I'm questioning my own understanding and all of my life decisions.

A coder was working on their default/unnamed line of development:

I usually use "python -c" to pass arguments to C program.

Like this:

I basically want to know the easiest way to pass a ruby variable from a content page to its layout using Nanoc and Slim. I am thinking of something like this:

content/content.slim:

I know how to use <- and ->, and there are several writeups on the difference between equals assignment & arrow assignment, but I don't know when to prefer -> over <-.

It seems the community has coalesced around using <- for assignment.

Neither the google R style-guide, nor Hadley Wickam's tidyverse R style-guide even mention -> in the assignment section.

I'm curious about the design considerations that led the S/S-PLUS developers to put in the right arrow assign operator ->. In what setting(s) would using -> be considered more readable (or easier to type) versus <- or =?

I'm not familiar with any other language that allows the right-assignment semantics. What languages inspired R in this regard?

I'm looking for answers that cite books / early design documents / user manuals / archived mailing lists or other references to establish what the S author/designer's intent was in putting in the forward-arrow assignment operator.

i see alot of code patterns in Reverse Engineering writeups and i don't understand it like this one (some_value >> 8) & 0xff can anyone explain it?

I have the following Bootstrap navigation set up. I want to reduce the space between each li in the ul under the "Coverage" dropdown-toggle. What setting do I use to do this? As a side note, when I set float: left on the ul li a, the space is reduced, but I don't need float to do this. Why does it reduce the space though?