if-net | Implicit Feature Network - Codebase | 3D Printing library

by jchibane Python Version: Current License: No License

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(1)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | if-net Summary

if-net is a Python library typically used in Modeling, 3D Printing applications. if-net has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities and it has low support. However if-net build file is not available. You can download it from GitHub.

Implicit Feature Network (IF-Net) - Codebase

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

if-net has a low active ecosystem.

It has 272 star(s) with 54 fork(s). There are 15 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 6 months.

There are 7 open issues and 35 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 11 days. There are no pull requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of if-net is current.

Quality

if-net has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

Security

if-net has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

if-net code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.

There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

License

if-net does not have a standard license declared.

Check the repository for any license declaration and review the terms closely.

Without a license, all rights are reserved, and you cannot use the library in your applications.

Reuse

if-net releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.

if-net has no build file. You will be need to create the build yourself to build the component from source.

Installation instructions, examples and code snippets are available.

if-net saves you 659 person hours of effort in developing the same functionality from scratch.

It has 1528 lines of code, 68 functions and 26 files.

It has medium code complexity. Code complexity directly impacts maintainability of the code.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi has reviewed if-net and discovered the below as its top functions. This is intended to give you an instant insight into if-net implemented functionality, and help decide if they suit your requirements.

Generator function that runs the generator
Generate the mesh of the mesh
Create multiple meshes
Creates a data loader object
Train model
Computes the sum loss of the model
Evaluate a mesh
Evaluate a file
Checks if voxel boundary is occupied
Check if voxel is occupied
R Check voxel unoccupied
Voxelize a mesh
Make a 3d 3d grid
Create voxels from a mesh
Save a mesh
Construct a trimesh trimesh
Convert a mesh into an incidence matrix
Create a grid of points
Create a voxel grid
Update split dataset
Create grid points from minimun bounds
Performs a boundary sampling

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

if-net Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for if-net.

if-net Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for if-net.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on if-net

DPDK for general purpose workload

QUESTION

DPDK for general purpose workload

Asked 2021-Nov-24 at 04:50

I have deployed OpenStack and configured OVS-DPDK on compute nodes for high-performance networking. My workload is a general-purpose workload like running haproxy, mysql, apache, and XMPP etc.

When I did load-testing, I found performance is average and after 200kpps packet rate I noticed packet drops. I heard and read DPDK can handle millions of packets but in my case, it's not true. In guest, I am using virtio-net which processes packets in the kernel so I believe my bottleneck is my guest VM.

I don't have any guest-based DPDK application like testpmd etc. Does that mean OVS+DPDK isn't useful for my cloud? How do I take advantage of OVS+DPDK with a general-purpose workload?

Updates

We have our own loadtesting tool which generate Audio RTP traffic which is pure UDP based 150bytes packets and noticed after 200kpps audio quality go down and choppy. In short DPDK host hit high PMD cpu usage and loadtest showing bad audio quality. when i do same test with SRIOV based VM then performance is really really good.

...

ANSWER

Answered 2021-Nov-24 at 04:50

When I did load-testing, I found performance is average and after 200kpps packet rate I noticed packet drops. In short DPDK host hit high PMD cpu usage and loadtest showing bad audio quality. when i do same test with SRI

[Answer] this observation is not true based on the live debug done so far. The reason as stated below

qemu launched were not pinned to specific cores.
comparison done against PCIe pass-through (VF) against vhost-client is not apples to apples comparison.
with OpenStack approach, there are at least 3 bridges before the packets to flow through before reaching VM.
OVS threads were not pinned which led to all the PMD threads running on the same core (causing latency and drops) in each bridge stage.

To have a fair comparison against SRIOV approach, the following changes have been made with respect to similar question

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69783902

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network