la | Meet larry , the labeled numpy array | Data Manipulation library

cleaner-offset-checkpoint is in kafka logs directory. This file keeps the last cleaned offset of the topic partitions in the broker like below.

For me, this is a natural fit for awk:

You're comparing your plain sql query string (DBConstants.GET_VEHICLE_REG_NUMBER) to the vehicleRegNumber parameter and no wonder they don't match.

What you need to compare is the result from your ps.executeQuery(); which is assigned to ResultSet rs.

Read the ResultSet javadoc to understand how you can extract data from it - https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/java/sql/ResultSet.html.

From the documentation for Twitter's standard search API that Tweepy's API.search uses:

Keep in mind that the search index has a 7-day limit. In other words, no tweets will be found for a date older than one week.

https://developer.twitter.com/en/docs/twitter-api/v1/tweets/search/guides/standard-operators also says:

The Search API is not a complete index of all Tweets, but instead an index of recent Tweets. The index includes between 6-9 days of Tweets.

Use syscall function code 3 to print doubles (not function code 2 — that's for single float).

Use mov.d to copy one register to another, e.g. into $f12 for sycalls (then no need to load 0.0 into $f0).

(Also, use l.d instead of ldc1.)

The loop: loop isn't a loop (there is no backward branch for it).

As @Peter says, your scaling/offsets are not properly accounting for the size of double, which is 8.  Scaling needs to multiply by 8 (shift by 3, not 2), and offsets need to be multiples of 8.

Your first loop, when its done, should not EXIT the program but rather continue with the next statement (i.e. the printing loop).

For this statement numbers[i+2] = numbers[i+1] + numbers[i]; there are two loads and one store as array references, whereas the assembly code is doing 3 loads and no store.

You use $s5, but never put anything in it.

The comparison of numbers[i+1] < 150 has to be done in (double) floating point, whereas the assembly code is attempting this in integer registers.

Floating point comparison is done using c.eq.d, c.lt.d, or c.le.d.  Like with integer compares, constants need to be in registers before the compare instruction.  150.0 would best come directly from memory (as a double constant) before the loop and remain there for the loop duration (or you can move integer 150 into a floating point register and convert that to double (cvt.w.d)).

Conditional branches on floating point compare conditions use either bc1t or bc1f (depending on the sense you want).

The C-like pseudo code probably doesn't run properly.  The exit condition for the first loop is suspect — it will probably run off the end of the array (depending on its initial data values).

Translating non-working C code into assembly is a recipe for frustration.  Suggest getting it working in C first; run it to make sure it works.

You don't need to create your dictionary from the corpus - instead, create a single dictionary entry for your locality list, and look that up to generate a count of each locality. You can then count them by compiling the dfm, and then converting the feature of that dictionary key into a logical to get the vector you want.

You are having a sort of syntax error right now because the closing quotation of the name is missing. Replace your code snippet with the following and try.

Change the condition of the loop

You try to assign the repeating image pattern to the whole page body - which is why it continues forever. What you should do instead, is to create two DIVs (optionally wrapped inside a third, outer DIV), one for your text, one for the image, and make the CSS applicable only to the one with image. See this CodePen for an example code: