gilfoyle | Gilfoyle 's cryptocurrency price notifier | REST library
kandi X-RAY | gilfoyle Summary
kandi X-RAY | gilfoyle Summary
Oh that's the song You suffer by Napalm Death.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- main entry point
- alert a price
- Clear the system .
- Get price from currency
gilfoyle Key Features
gilfoyle Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on gilfoyle
QUESTION
Applications in GSuite can have domain-wide delegation (DWD) enabled, allowing the application to access user data (and other domain data) without any interaction on the part of the users.
According to a Google Support article, it is implied that the application is limited by the scopes set on the application.
However, reading various responses on Stack Exchange regarding "user impersonation" makes me wonder about the validity of this. See:
- Breno's response "The domain-wide delegation model allows a service account to impersonate a user and thus obtain the same privileges in the domain that the user identity + set of scopes granted to the application imply."
- Kessy's and Gilfoyle's responses "...This means that the service account only has access to data from the account the application is impersonating...." and "...First and foremost: A service account is technically a superadministrator once DWD ..."
- Edited question ("Solution")
There is nothing concrete, but it appears (possibly incorrectly) that once an application impersonates the "right" user with sufficient admin privileges, any required data can be accessed. I've trawled through the Google Support documentation, but there is very little about scopes with regards to impersonating users that I could find. I haven't the experience building such an application to know what to look for.
My questions:
(Q) Can applications with DWD enabled do more than the scopes allow by impersonating a superadmin? If not, if one of those scopes includes the authority to change the user password (e.g. https://www.googleapis.com/auth/admin.directory.user), doesn't that mean an application can bootstrap itself and add any other, needed scopes?
Alternatively, are applications with DWD limited by their scopes, even when impersonating a super admin?
I'm not a developer; I'm a system admin with very some light/informal dev experience, so I would be greatly appreciative if you could pitch your answers accordingly.
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Oct-19 at 14:10- The impersonation can only perform requests on user's behalf within the range of the scopes authorized in the Admin consoles under
Security -> API controls
- A certain application can only use the scopes that were given to the service account when creating a credentials object
- If you enable in the admin console e.g. the scope
https://www.googleapis.com/auth/admin.directory.user.readonly
for a specific service account, this service account - when impersonated - will only be able to VIEW users, not to perform any request what goes beyond the limits ofhttps://www.googleapis.com/auth/admin.directory.user.readonly
- Even if you enable the full
https://www.googleapis.com/auth/admin.directory.user
scope in the admin console, but when creating the service account credentials object, you pass it onlyhttps://www.googleapis.com/auth/admin.directory.user.readonly
as a scope - within the frame of the specific application, the service account equally will not be able to perform requests going beyond the scopehttps://www.googleapis.com/auth/admin.directory.user.readonly
The assumption once an application impersonates the "right" user with sufficient admin privileges, any required data can be accessed
is confusing.
It would be more correct to say once an application impersonates the "right" user with sufficient admin privileges, any required data can be accessed - IF THE RESPECTIVE SCOPES HAVE BEEN ENABLED IN THE ADMIN CONSOLE AND GRANTED TO THE SERVICE ACCOUNT CREDENTIALS OBJECT OF THE SPECIFIC APPLICATION
.
- As a general rule of thumb, you should avoid providing (both when working with and without service account) to generous scopes, it is better to provide several specific scopes, rather than one broad scope.
QUESTION
I have an app.vue
file in which i have the parent codes.
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Feb-14 at 07:38It is not that you are accessing the prop incorrectly, you are actually not passing the misc
to the child component at all. You are only passing employees
as a prop if you read carefully:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install gilfoyle
You can use gilfoyle like any standard Python library. You will need to make sure that you have a development environment consisting of a Python distribution including header files, a compiler, pip, and git installed. Make sure that your pip, setuptools, and wheel are up to date. When using pip it is generally recommended to install packages in a virtual environment to avoid changes to the system.
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page