pawn | Princeton Automated WordNet | Natural Language Processing library

I am currently making a game where a player can go from third person view, walking around to transition into a vehicle.

I have thought about using a transmitter/receiver type set up, but I think my way of simplifying it isn't correct.

I am using assets from third parties for controllers that use inputs. My plan was to enable/disable the appropriate script and camera from the object I want to control. I've gotten as far as being able to disable the previous controller and enable the next, though I can't go back to enabling since the script obviously doesn't run anymore.

I'd like to be able to reference the pawn's input component script in a different component script on the same gameobject to then be able to enable/disable the aformentioned component, though the issue is that the input controllers have variable names (Different names depending on the third party on each pawn).

Here's how I have it set up: I have a PlayerTransmitter that handles the basics of turning things on and off. I tried making this where all of the inputs are being handled, but I don't want to have to change the original controller scripts to look at this script. This is on an empty game object and handles the 'state' of the player, (walking or in which vehicle).

on each pawn gameobject (The walking pawn CleanerPawn and the vehicle TractorPawn), I've added a script called InputReceiver. This was originally intended to pass the inputs from the PlayerTransmitter to the actual controller on the object itself.

Right now, the walking pawn has a component called AdvancedWalkerController (You may know the one I'm talking about) that controls the player walking movement and the vehicle has a component called VehicleController which controls how the vehicle moves and handles.

CleanerPawn

TractorPawn

The two images above show that I am using the same InputReceiver component on both pawns. My plan was to pass in each pawn's input controller (temporarily named CleanerController) and then enable/disable that input controller depending on the PlayerTransmitter 'state'.

The InputReceiver currently looks like this:

I'm trying to understand how to call events between client and server. My goal for now is simple. I want to create anything that is interactable for 2 players.

Easiest thing I could think of was cube that is switching color when clicked. So I did create actor based blueprint, checked "Replicates" and AlwaysRelevant to be sure. PlayerController is also replicated and there is no pawn needed.

Color change blueprint:

SM is just static mesh if that is important. As far as I know client have no authority to call multicast events so I wanted to push it through server but it stops there. Called from server works as expected and color itself IS replicated to client, however client cannot change color himself.

What am I missing in this concept? I've watched like 5 videos about replication and I started to think there is something missing which is either obvious for everyone but me or their examples do not need things I do here.

I have a DataFrame whose first 3 rows look like this:

I am trying to make a chess game in java, by having a class of pieces and a subclass for each piece. However, When I try to draw the pieces, The position doesn't seem to register.

Here is my Piece class:

I'm making a game engine for a board game called Blockade and right now I'm trying to generate all legal moves in a position. The rules aren't exactly the same as the actual game and they don't really matter. The gist is: the board is a matrix and you move a pawn and place a wall every move.

In short, I have to find whether or not a valid path exists from every pawn to every goal after every potential legal move (imagine a pawn doesn't move and a wall is just placed), to rule out illegal moves. Or rather, if I simplify it to a subproblem, whether or not the removal of a few edges (placing a wall) removes all paths to a node.

Brute-forcing it would take O(k*n*m), where n and m are the board dimensions and k is the number of potential legal moves. Searching for a path (worst case; traversing most of the board) is very expensive, but I'm thinking with dynamic programming or some other idea/algorithm it can be done faster since the position is the same the wall placement just changes, or rather, in graph terms, the graph is the same which edges are removed is just changed. Any sort of optimization is welcome.

To elaborate on the wall (blockade). A wall is two squares wide/tall (depending on whether it's horizontal or vertical) therefore it will usually remove at least four edges, eg:

p | r
q | t

In this 2x2 matrix, placing a wall in the middle (as shown) will remove jumping from and to:
p and t, q and r, p and r, and q and t

I currently have a painting with 64 tiles, each color is defined. Grey is a valid position, black is an invalid position (a wall), green is player pawn 1 and red is player pawn 2. When player 1 clicks on his green pawn he can choose to duplicate himself on a valid tile close to him (Grey) or jump on the 2nd tile close to him. If ever the green pawn is a tile close to the red pawn it becomes green Now what I'm looking for is.

How to search for all valid positions either a ready tile or jump on the 2nd and correctly checked what is there afterwards.

I'm trying to create a swing chessboard with icons and i have trouble with putting the icons onto the JButtons using a HashMap. Here are the classes that i'm working with:

Main Class

I am trying to create a chess game using html and js. Here is part of my HTML code -

After a few days of my question being closed, and my edits that would answer all of the questions in the comments not being approved, I have decided to re-post with a few changes.

I am new to c++, but I am an experienced programmer. I am trying to create a chess engine, as I have done it in python but I want it faster. I am storing my chess board as a 2d array of Piece pointers.

chessBoard.h