organizer | Organise files with organizer | Command Line Interface library

As it's stated in the hibernate documentation:

For JPQL and HQL, DISTINCT has two meanings:

1. It can be passed to the database so that duplicates are removed from a result set

2. It can be used to filter out the same parent entity references when join fetching a child collection

You are interested in the second case, so, you need to add the QueryHints.HINT_PASS_DISTINCT_THROUGH hint, like below:

As the error suggests looks like your fundraizer.organizer is undefined and your trying to access name from undefined.

This may be because your value of fundraizer might be an {} or null or undefined . To prevent your app from breaking you can guard your values.

Pass default values

you need to create an array:

Think of the brackets syntax [] for the destructing operation as an index to a property of an object, not an array that you pass in. It's analogous to calling for example obj["a"] vs obj.a to access the a field on obj.

So knowing this, you need to pass in 3 arguments to extract the values that you want to remove. For null and undefined I had to put them in separate variables, it wasn't working when putting them directly in the brackets:

I found the solution which in fact was pretty easy but something things are hard to solve at times as i was not able to find reference regarding this on internet almost all example which i saw showed 1 event in their example..

Multiple events are wrapper in Square Brackets [] only then they will show properly.

Below code works fine but in my actual code few warning for optional parameters appears which are due to optional parameters such as offer, performer which are not related to this event.

I resolved this issue by replacing service account authentication with oauth.

• https://developers.google.com/calendar/quickstart/php
• https://github.com/spatie/laravel-google-calendar#authentication-with-oauth2
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pOdgE22D-1U&t=730s

Your use-case diagram tries to model the user interface, with a View main dashboard that leads to different software functions such as Party control and so on. This is not the way for use-cases. Instead:

• Each use-case should correspond to some higher level goal of some actors. THE goals should be independent of how the solution would look like. It's the same goals whether it's a text-based UI or a GUI, whether it's one single windows or multiple ones.
• Use-case diagram shall not represent any sequence. Your diagram shows some kind of sequence, first the dashboard and from there, party control. Use case diagram should never rely on any sequencing.
• Dotted arrows such as «include» and «extend» are dependencies and not a sequential flow. By the way, extension should be the other way round: the target of the arrows is the use-case to be extended.

Let's igore those issues for the sake of answering your question; let's suppose you'd have only valid use-cases and dependencies. There is also a flaw in the actor inheritance:

• Is an organizer a supporter ? Well, may be that some persons who have an organizer role also act as a supporter. In this case you should consider keeping both actors completely independent: it's not about the persons, but about their roles.
• Your diagram tells another story: if Organizer is a Supporter (inheritance, i.e. the arrow should be a big hollow triangle) it means that every Organizer is always a Supporter.
• If there are goals that a Supporter has but not an Organizer, then you shouldn't use inheritance. Or if you do, create a pseudo-actor with the common goals and let each role be a specializations of the common denominator and adding the relevant goals.
• If there are a couple of thing that the Organizer can do but not the the Supporter, then you can keep it as it is, but add a link from Organizer to the the more specialized goals.

If you inspect the cookies on the webpage in Chrome with Inspect Element -> application -> storage -> cookies -> https://us.louisvuitton.com/ you see about 40 cookies. However if you add import pprint to your code and at line 50 pprint.pprint(s.cookies.get_dict()) you see only 4 cookies. So you are missing many cookies.

The response you get is actually an Access Denied message as you can see if you use Inspect Element -> Network copy as cURL on the https://api.louisvuitton.com/api/eng-us/catalog/availability/nvprod... URL and remove the cookies except for your 4 and run it, if you run it will all the cookies it works fine.

So as there are many XHR requests than can set cookies I suggest you either go through all requests decode them if needed and read all the JavaScript files to see if they set cookies or a much easier solution use Selenium, requests-html https://pypi.org/project/requests-html/ or PyQT

I generally use a class if the file has a certain structure. For instance, as like in FastQ file. I put the following lines in input_file.txt and returns 5 lines. You can do whatever you want with it.

input_file.txt