obfuscation | Evaluation of the Author Masking Task at PAN2016 | Natural Language Processing library

I'm retrieving a json and when I convert it to List using gson, the app crashes. The proguard is on and the problem is there.

My android studio version is

This pertains to code running in user-mode. For simplicity of the question, let's say we've taken any shared libraries / OS APIs called on by a program and statically linked them in memory, so we're not calling out to any abstraction layer, just using system calls directly.

I'm doing an experiment to achieve binary obfuscation by identifying certain non-mutable states (I think system calls and jumps) without having to build a relatively advanced obfuscation approach. Basically I emulate the program storing state changes for every instruction executed. When I reach a system call or jump, I mark that as a boundary and every instruction executed in-between two boundaries as a "function". My theory is that in user-mode programs, system calls are the only states (by states I mean instructions being executed along with the register and stack state at that instant) that have an "effect" outside of the program. In other words, whatever changes you want your program to make to the system in user-mode, system calls are the only means with which that happens.

If I'm wrong about that stop me here.

So based on that understanding, I hypothesize that I can mutate each of those functions in an almost infinite number of ways so long as the resulting instructions lead to the same state at the end of the function so that the system call arguments remain identical. Of course control flow also needs to be preserved so I treat jumps as preserved states too. I'm achieving this by using a Monte Carlo Tree Search to solve for the desired state from the mutated state. In order words, if I follow those rules and patch that mutated program back together and update all the jumps to reach the same functions they were previously pointing to, my program should externally perform the same goal it originally did, but through different instructions.

Here's a visual diagram. If zoomed in on, it's legible but SO's compression makes it a bit fuzzy.

This concept only intends to obfuscate memory, register, and instruction-sequence analysis channels (and without further specifications, would not obfuscate them 'entirely')

Is my premise flawed?

i use agp(android gradle plugin) 7.0.4 after run proguard -> interface parameter name changed (com.android.tools.build:gradle:4.2.2 version not changed interface parameter names)

in Gradle 4.2.2

I want to use proguard with a javafx application with some custom controls.

1. I have a custom control that contains a poperty

   ...

I use Redux-Saga in situations where there is complex business logic that is best separated from the component. We are adopting RTK Query and aren't able to use the endpoints manually. Yes, I am aware that Redux best practices docs suggest using Thunk when at all possible.

This particular saga task example doesn't make a great case for using Redux-Saga but there are definitely situations where the business logic is so involved/long/complex that it doesn't belong in a component and where we use saga functionality that can't be (elegantly) emulated with a simple Thunk. In this example I want to make a simple mutation (post request) on the backend:

I am currently trying to use the --gsplit-dwarf gcc flag in order to automatically create and separate debug symbols from build libraries/executables. More info on DWARF Obj files. However, what I have observed is that split-dwarf still leaves a lot of unnecessary information in the remaining .o file. What I would like to do is use strip to remove that info but still have it be compatible for debugging using the .dwo/.dwp files; however, it seems that this does not work. I want to strip the release executables for space savings and for further obfuscation, and was hoping split-dwarf would allow me to do so.

Additional reference

Example app app.cpp

I'm looking from some kind of obfuscation bidirectional algorithm, that maps integer (in a range, like [0 , 2^10]) to a string, to avoid URL manipulation

I see here that is suggested to generate a random string and use that as ID, but I need to associate this string to already existing data, thing that I would not consider that scalable, since I would have to generate the string for 400k entries... and furthermore, I can't encrypt it since I need this to be stored in a NFC tag, and so the memory is very limited

For the moment, I'm converting int to UUID, but at the end of the day, this changes anything, it's just the int value with some 0s as paddings

Are there anything like this?

The use cause would be:

I am a beginner in modding Minecraft and would like to modify the latest release of the Forge version of Minecraft (v1.17.1). I know how to setup a gradle project for 1.16.5, and can for the most part do it for 1.17.1. The problem is that I have no idea what obfuscation mappings are for Forge 1.17.1. I need to know so that I have the correct mappings to put for line 34 of build.gradle: