subconscious | redis-backed db for python3 | Reactive Programming library

I have a model like

Though Fortran is case insensitive, I observe the same is not the case when strings are compared using if check. Of course, the user should be aware of this.

However, Fortran being case insensitive, subconsciously I expect the same to apply for string checks as well. What's the efficient way to achieve case insensitive string comparison?

I have a subdirectory (app) I want to access that is in the root folder of my wordpress site. I have looked here:

https://wordpress.stackexchange.com/questions/20152/cannot-access-non-wordpress-subdirectories-as-wordpress-overrides-them-with-a-40

I have tried the solutions and nothing worked.

I also tried adding a separate .htaccess file to the app subdirectory that looks like this:

I am trying to create a test that explores the boundaries of our subconscious. I want to briefly display a number and see if the user can use their intuition to guess the value - is their subconscious able to read the number faster than their conscious self. So I am trying to flash a number onto the screen for a few milliseconds. Chrome does not seem to behave as well as Edge in with this code. How can I make it work more consistently across browsers?

I have tried various ways of hiding and revealing the number. Finally ending up with this version.

I tried to do my first steps with "lambda" in Dr Racket. (Advanced language)

Everything was fine until I tried out the following piece of code:

I'm iterating over a list with a foreach loop and I want to do some additional stuff to exactly one of the x that I iterate over (specifically cryoTemp in the code below). I could add this functionality with a simple if statement in the body of the loop, but it sets off a subconscious "bad code" alarm in my head, as the if statement will be evaluated on every iteration, even though it will only evaluate to true once. Is there a smarter, perhaps more "Pythonic" way to do this?

Hask is usually thought to be the category whose objects are types and morphisms are functions. However, I've seen Conor McBride (@pigworker) warn against the use of Hask multiple times (1, 2, 3):

• I would discourage talk of "the Hask Category" because it subconsciously conditions you against looking for other categorical structure in Haskell programming.

• Note, I dislike the use of "Hask" as the name of the "category of Haskell types and functions": I fear that labelling one category as the Haskell category has the unfortunate side-effect of blinding us to the wealth of other categorical structure in Haskell programming. It's a trap.

• I wish people wouldn't call it "Hask", though: it threatens to limit the imagination.

What other categories can we see in Haskell?

In one of his answers, he touches upon some of these ideas, but I wonder if someone could expand upon it; and I wonder if there are even more examples.

[...] there's a ton of categorical structure lurking everywhere, there's certainly a ton of categorical structure available (possibly but not necessarily) at higher kinds. I'm particularly fond of functors between indexed families of sets.

Some of my coworkers have been using sub-queries in places where you can simply use a join. pros and cons partially discussed in this SO post.

Most of their queries can be reduced down to the following pattern:

This is my first time posting here, so forgive stupid mistakes if such happen.

I am a beginner in C coding (learning right now), and frankly not much of a math genius so the problem I encountered stumps me quite a bit. I found a solution to it by the way of testing different things, but honestly I don't exactly understand why my solution does work, and the code before the solution applied doesn't.

The code is a binary search for a given number in a sorted array created by using seeded srand48, and sorted with a linear sort.

To frame the situation. Code before the solution did work well until array reached 45 elements, then it stopped finding the number.

Before the solution code: