gruut | text cleaner , and phonemizer for many human languages | Natural Language Processing library
kandi X-RAY | gruut Summary
kandi X-RAY | gruut Summary
A tokenizer, text cleaner, and IPA phonemizer for several human languages that supports SSML. Note that "wound" and "read" have different pronunciations when used in different (grammatical) contexts.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Return all sentences in the graph
- Get the out edges of the given node
- Return the phonemes for a given break type
- Find the parent of the given node
- Run the test
- Generate graphemes phonemes
- Compute graphemes
- Splits a word into punctuations
- Return True if word is in lexicon
- Try to transform a date
- Splits the texts in the given language
- Split replacements
- Split the major breaks
- Break words
- Split minor breaks
- Split spell out text
- Collapse a list of words
- Transform a word to a currency
- Convert text to phonemes
- Convert a fst file to a graph
- Post - process text processor
- Process a Word node
- Handle verbalize
- Convert a word
- Get command line arguments
- Explicitize a time node
gruut Key Features
gruut Examples and Code Snippets
echo 'This, right here, is some "RAW" text!' \
| gruut --language en-us \
| jq --raw-output '.words[].text'
This
,
right
here
,
is
some
"
RAW
"
text
!
gruut --language en-us 'More text.' | jq .
{
"idx": 0,
"text": "More text.",
"text_w
from gruut import sentences
text = 'He wound it around the wound, saying "I read it was $10 to read."'
for sent in sentences(text, lang="en-us"):
for word in sent:
if word.phonemes:
print(word.text, *word.phonemes)
He h ˈi
tomato
t ə m ˈɑ t oʊ
tomato
t ə m ˈi t oʊ
tomato
tomato
tomato
toma
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on gruut
QUESTION
I would like to add synonyms for the subcommands in my Haskell command line tool. For example summarise
and summarize
should yield the same result. Of course I could just add an entirely separate command summarize
, that appears as an own element in the output of --help
. But maybe there is a more elegant way.
Here is a self-contained example in a stack script opt_ex.hs
:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-21 at 20:29I don't think you can do this. It works fine for options, because the definition of OptField contains a list of OptName, and adds to that list when you use (<>)
. But the definition of CommandFields, the thing returned by command
, is
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install gruut
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page