prosaic | cut-up poetry generation over large corpora | Natural Language Processing library
kandi X-RAY | prosaic Summary
kandi X-RAY | prosaic Summary
prosaic is a tool for cutting up large quantities of text and rearranging it to form poetic works.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Create a new poem
- Create a poem from a template
- Returns the corpus
- Maps letters to sound_cache
- Return True iff alliterations in the sentence have alliterations
- Convert a word to phonemes
- Return a list of words in a sentence
- Return the first element of xs
- Return the rhyme sound
- Compose function f and g
- Create a new source
- Process text
- Composes a function into a function
- Generate a query string
- Create a new corpus
- Remove a source from the database
- Link the source to the database
- List available sources
- Process lines of text
- The template
- Count the number of syllables in a word
- Extract rule from raw_pair
- Convert a ruleset to a single line
- Remove all files from the database
- Dispatch the function
- Delete all corpora
- List available corpus names
prosaic Key Features
prosaic Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on prosaic
QUESTION
For XML, there are Document Type Definitions (DTD) which define all elements, but is there something similar for YAML?
I found a post on Validating YAML with an XML DTD which suggests to use DTDs anyhow and/or a simple XML, but I am doubtful whether that is feasible in my case: My project decided to have a (custom) YAML format. From a YAML file in this format a rather intricate XML is algorithmically generated. The YAML contains much less information than the XML, but all significant things a human editor must know.
At the moment, the definition of my YAML is mainly prosaic (as quite abstract requirement text) an as the actual source code which does the parsing and conversion to XML. Both is not suitable for end users which are supposed to maintain the YAML file. Is there a clean and concise way to define my custom YAML syntax?
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jan-03 at 12:44Firstly, YAML is the syntax. What you want to describe is not syntax, but structure.
YAML is a serialization format. Therefore, the type of the data you serialize from and deserialize into is the structure description of a YAML file. Unless you're using YAML for data interexchange, you typically have one application the implements loading the YAML file.
By default, a lot of YAML implementations deserialize to a heterogeneous structure of lists, dictionaries and simple values (string, int, …). However, if you assume a certain structure, you can write down types that define that structure and then load your YAML into an object of that type. Simple example (Java in this case):
QUESTION
Rust has binary literals, a binary formatter, and a host of integer types, but no explicit binary numeric type.
'Almost-binary' integersIt's true that the expected implementation of an unsigned integer is a big/little-endian binary number in general purpose machines. However, that's far removed from the syntax of a high-level language. For example, if I have an eight-bit binary number 0000 0101 that I want to treat syntactically like a primitive numeric type, I have two problems: (1) the character representation of the number, and (2) the type declaration for the number. If I decide to stick with u8, I have to add a layer of string operations (in Rust) or a layer of vector operations (in MATLAB, for example) where numbers will be displayed or declared literally, and I have to ensure that the binary representation is converted to its equivalent in u8. In this situation, there's no way to make the direct statement 0000 0101 + 0000 0111 without this machinery bubbling up to the syntactic level, and that's just for binary types whose sizes happen to line up with integer types.
An example would be, say, a hypothetical type b3, which is a 3-bit binary number, supporting the appropriate mathematical operations in its field. At a minimum, those operations would be arithmetic, closed over the type b3, of course. (The one defining the type would have to define a convention for how that closure is achieved in practice, e.g., by wrapping or asserting that the result of an operation that can't be expressed in b3 is not defined.)
A binary type like this could be declared as such and then used syntactically the same way as any other numeric type. Thus, 101 + 001 == 110, without the need to deploy bitwise operators, among other added requirements.
If these operations seem prosaic in a programming language that is already expected to have binary representations at its foundation, note that there are subtleties in implementing finite field arithmetic in C-like languages:
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Mar-02 at 16:42In good faith, and perhaps so we can all agree nobody here is crazy (?), I implemented a crate that is an attempt at capturing the semantics of finite fields in Rust independent of the underlying expectations of the language or hardware. I have to warn you that it is neither rigorously tested nor efficiently implemented, but it compiles and so does its examples.
It offers the following semantics:
If you can think of a finite field as either a set of coefficients of a restricted polynomial, or as a vector of p-adic numbers, you can define a type that will store the coefficients as a vector that quacks like a number. For example, a field of two-digit binary numbers can be generated with the following macro:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install prosaic
See the full tutorial for more detailed instruction. There is also a cli reference.
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page
