SSAN | Selective Self-attention Networks | Predictive Analytics library
kandi X-RAY | SSAN Summary
kandi X-RAY | SSAN Summary
Selective Self-attention Networks
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Perform multihead attention
- Computes the multiplicative attention
- Split inputs into num_heads
- Combine the input tensors
- Create a train op
- Get or create the loss variable
- Collect gradients
- Get training input
- Generate examples
- Generate new keys
- Get old keys
- Get inference function
- Calculate BLEU
- Overrides parameters
- Calculate input features
- Convert source to record
- Generates plot of multiple bleu profiles
- Restore variables from checkpoint
- Parse command line arguments
- Default hyperparameters
- Get features from inputs
- Runs the evaluation
- Validate and save the evaluation function
- Create inference graph
- Attention layer
- Compute additive attention
SSAN Key Features
SSAN Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on SSAN
QUESTION
I'm trying to do fuzzy matching using pyspark or python, where I have 2 lists.
i. cities standard values list
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jul-07 at 20:53Use fuzzywuzzy, and change threshold to meet your requirements:
QUESTION
I am looking to speed up the following PL/SQL function. Right now it has run for over 2 hours with no sign of completing. We aborted that one and attempting it again with a EXIT WHEN of 20 and it still shows no signs of actually completing.
We are running these through SQLDeveloper 17.3, and each of the (4) tables has about 15k rows.
The goal is to grab all of the SSN's in our database and change the first character to an illegal char and the last 2 characters to a random A-Z combination. We then have to update that SSN in every table that uses it (4).
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Jul-10 at 13:33I'd do it without a function in plain SQL:
Create a table with old and new ssn:
QUESTION
This app uses CloudKit for record storage and Core Data on the local device. Records created locally are saved to Core Data. The following method is called to send records that are created locally to CloudKit. I call this method when the app starts and when the app returns from the background. I also have programmed a button for the testing phase which calls this method.
The behavior seems to be completely random. For example if I create 10 records, some number of them are correctly uploaded to CloudKit and some number fail. If I rerun the method manually, eventually they all upload to CloudKit. I have been unable to determine ANY pattern for success or failure. At this point I seed test records from a method that makes the records all identical except for recordName(UUID) and a suffix for the text fields.
With limited testing if I create just one record it has always worked.
If I create just two records, an occasional failure.
If I create five records, there is almost always a failure.
Inside the modifyRecordsCompletionBlock, the updateSavedToCloudKitSuccess() and cleanUpTmpFile() always complete correctly regardless of whether the upload is successful.
I also tried increasing the timeouts and that makes absolutely no difference.
Any guidance would be appreciated. Xcode 8.3.3 iOS10 Swift 3
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Jun-05 at 03:22I solved this issue by putting the asset save operation inside a sync global queue.
QUESTION
This is for a school project and I appreciate your help.
EXPECTED SYSTEM BEHAVIOR: When SSN column in the txt file is not equal to 9 digits, the row that includes that column should not be inserted in the database.
ACTUAL BEHAVIOR: When SSN Column is not equal to 9 digits, it still insert it into the database.
Columns to be inserted: Last name, First name, MI, SSAN and Payrate.
Stored procedure code for the SSAN: @SSAN nchar(9)
This is how I execute the SSAN in my class which contains my SQL:
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-May-29 at 23:15Your problem appears in your IsValidRecord. You have a single variable, blnOK, which you are toggling back and forth.
The variable blnOK starts out as true, then strFields[0] is checked. You then set blnOK to true or false, which is fine. However, you then check strFields[1], and proceed to set blnOK to true or false based on that value, regardless of what the previous check was. This continues through all your fields. The net result is that the result of the IsValidRecord will always be the result of the last field you check (in this case, strFields[4]), no matter what the result of the other checks happened to be.
The simple way to fix this is to return blnOK; whenever you change it's value to false, which will cause the function to "short circuit", and not even check any of the other fields. The first field which fails will fail the entire batch of fields.
If you want to check all the fields, then you can check the state of blnOK in each check, and only set it to true if it wasn't previously set to false in a prior check.
Another way to handle this would be to have a variable for each field, and return an aggregate of all the values. something like:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install SSAN
You can use SSAN like any standard Python library. You will need to make sure that you have a development environment consisting of a Python distribution including header files, a compiler, pip, and git installed. Make sure that your pip, setuptools, and wheel are up to date. When using pip it is generally recommended to install packages in a virtual environment to avoid changes to the system.
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page
