tech-blog | My personal tech blog ( Python Django Docker Go | Pub Sub library

I've found a solution:

MainActivity:

This will not work because the function signatures don't match. You can do:

• Make Context a shared interface, so every package can use it. This does not necessarily introduce dependencies between packages using it.
• Use context.Context, and expect to see the key in there. This is essentially the same as #1 but using a known predefined type
• Use interface{} instead of context, and use type assertion to convert it to the local context type.

These settings should get you that 'prefer local' behavior you want:

decreaseNetworkConsumerPriority="true" suppressDuplicateQueueSubscriptions="true"

Also, add messagTTL = 4 and consumerTTL = 1. This allows messages to hop around n + 1 times. (Where n is the number of brokers in your cluster). Also, consumerTTL = 1 means brokers will only see consumers from their immediate peer, and not see over multiple hops.

In your use case, drop the networkTTL setting-- messageTTl and consumerTTL replace it and give you more control over message hops and consumer awareness.

Is there a standard procedure to tuning parameters: Likely not, as this a pretty big area in engineering. It strongly depends on the type of system you need to control, although you limited to PID already, for which a set of tuning methods exist.

In the Dymola Manual 2 there is a section about tuning parameters using the Design library based on the example Design.Optimization.Examples.ControllerDesign_F14. The tutorial related is given in section "First optimization setup". It uses optimization and should be rather generally applicable. Also the LinearSystems2 library can be of great help, as it provides tools for controller design, e.g. a state-space representation of a model (after linearization).

Regarding your specific problem, it is a bit difficult to judge from your screenshot, but assuming it is cascaded control, this should help. In case the controlled variables influence each other they should be decoupled, as e.g. shown here. If non of the before is the case and there are no strong limitations expected in the actuators manual tuning seems feasible.

BTW: Modelica is especially well suited for complex control problems as it can use the plant model to do inverse control. But this seems to be a bit over-engineered for your application.

I am not 100 % sure if I get your Problem right. But I think you should try to replace || with && in your if statement.

|| = or && = and

Thus it will only go into the shutdown parts, when all Clients are off.

You would have to follow below steps to disconnect the deployment in this case.

1. Go to https://resources.azure.com/ i.e., go to your newly created App service resource in Azure portal and click on 'Resource explorer' tile.
2. Now in Resource Explorer, go to config -> web.
3. Make sure you are in "Read/Write" mode rather than in "Read only" mode.
4. Click "Edit" to update the "web" JSON file.
5. Now change "scmType" key's value to "None".
6. Click "PUT".

Just a note on failed part is, AFAIK your template failed to link bitbucket repo because it could not find source control token for your bitbucket repo.

Hope this helps!! Cheers!!

It is difficult to answer without seeing more code, however I believe in MVP you should configure your view controllers using a Configurator.

As specified in the Slick doc, groupBy currently doesn't support executing a query with nested values of type Query:

The intermediate query (i.e. the query ended with groupBy() without an aggregate function) contains nested values of type Query. These would turn into nested collections when executing the query, which is not supported at the moment. Therefore it is necessary to flatten the nested queries immediately by aggregating their values (or individual columns)

In other words, your Slick groupBy query must be coupled with an aggregate function equivalent to SQL's count(), sum(), etc. For example, the following query which is equivalent to select count(*) ... group by ... having count(*) > 1 would work:

Copy and update record expressions — the one, which allows you to write { rec with prop = val } — is a convenient shortcut for creation of new record with a few changes from existing record instance.

I may be wrong, for sure, but this syntax is allowed for record types only, while you've declared a Match class with custom constructor, which is not a record.

So you may want to use a record instead.