CiPA | R code used to perform uncertainty quantification
kandi X-RAY | CiPA Summary
kandi X-RAY | CiPA Summary
R code used to perform uncertainty quantification for the CiPA in silico model.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of CiPA
CiPA Key Features
CiPA Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on CiPA
QUESTION
On a newly built AEM 6.3 Author server (Service Pack 2), the RTE component automatically prepends our Author URL to any asset selected through the Asset Selector.
The domain is prepended only after selecting the asset and clicking OK. Before clicking okay, the relative path is the only thing there.
But immediately after selecting the asset, it's possible to confirm from the JCR that the path contains the Author domain.
And if you open back up the asset selector, the prepended path is visible there, too.
I'm not sure it's the root of the issue, but the first time I see an absolute link show up during processing is when the Link.js file (/libs/clientlibs/granite/richtext/core/js/commands/Link.js) creates a the HTML node for the tag. Even though url
is relative, childNodes[0].href
is absolute:
ANSWER
Answered 2019-Feb-28 at 16:46We were on AEM Service Pack 6.3.2. Installing cumulative service pack 6.3.3.3 fixed the problem.
Specifically, it was updates to the Coral RTE component in the com.adobe.granite.ui.coralui3-rte-0.0.32-CQ630-B0022 package. ("A content package that provides the ExtJS-compatible version of the RTE Core and Coral RTE as clientlibs.")
It turns out that the Link.js file (libs/clientlibs/granite/richtext/core/js/commands/Link.js) did contain the bug, as we suspected.
The code used to read:
QUESTION
I would like the function to return the result of this action on the values from the table below:
a+b*c-(e/f)
This action is worked whithout row with e and f. I found similar problem here but there is no solution for this one special last row. I'm shure how i should get value from e and f inputs. The function shul be workinf for each row - no matter how many of them will be.
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Nov-22 at 18:20You did this:
QUESTION
I have a qustion at the beginning if testing with Jasmine is supposed to be so difficult? The app works perfectly in compiling but when I test it a million errors appear like this one here. I have read any possible resource about importing FormsModule in angular.
I have this component:
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-May-15 at 07:54- There is no directive with "exportAs" set to "ngForm" ([ERROR ->]#editForm="ngForm">)
- Can't bind to 'ngModel' since it isn't a known property of XXX
- There is no directive with "exportAs" set to "ngbDatepicker" ([ERROR ->]#fechaNacimientoDp="ngbDatepicker")
- The pipe 'translate' could not be found ([ERROR ->]'oncosupApp.Sexo.VARON' | translate)
QUESTION
NOTE - Yes, the question from 2011 that my question is suggested as a dupe of, this one here, has answers I could use, but Zohar's answer below is by far the best of all of them, and possibly takes into consideration advances in C# that did not exist 7 years ago. Thus the question is indeed a dupe, but the best answer is found HERE, not THERE.
I'm reading the EXIF information in digital photographs taken with a camera, and photographs scanned by my scanner, and am finding that while the Canon scanner formats the date with "/", the Fujifilm camera formats them with ":". I need to parse these strings to DateTime, and would like a nifty short way of doing it. I don't know if other makers provide EXIF data with yet different date formats, such as hyphens ("-"), periods (".") or some other delimiter, and how I am supposed to allow for all of them? I know one way to do it (try-catch blocks looking for FormatException), but is there a better way?
By the way, the EXIF standard specifies yyyy:mm:dd, with the colon (:) for delimiter, but as mentioned, my Canon scanner (Canoscan 9000F Mk II) uses the slant (/). Presumably other makers could use a different delimiter.
The camera is providing: "2008:10:06 16:00:07"
For which I can do:
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Apr-04 at 13:46Be very careful with ambiguous formats. If one device returns yyyy/MM/dd
and the other returns yyyy/dd/MM
you might find yourself returning wrong results.
I would recommend TryParseExact
instead of ParseExact
in a try..catch block.
The overload I've linked to can take an array of strings as possible formats, and will parse successfully if the input string matches exactly (at least) one of them.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install CiPA
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page