types | package provides a simple type annotation

You can use a conditional expression:

try require('dotenv').config()

I haven't come across such a ConcurrentCounter library, but crates.io is huge, maybe you find something. However, if you are mostly concerned with primitives such as i32, there is a better alternative call: Atomics, definitely worth checking out.

Nevertheless, your approach of generalizing the ConcurrentCounter is going in a good direction. In the context of operation overloading, std::ops is worth a look. Specifically, you need Add, Sub, and Mul, respectively. Also, you need a Copy bound (alternatively, a Clone would also do). So you were pretty close:

typeof is a way to refer to the type of a value. example:

Nuxt makes the $config available in two ways: as this.$config on every component instance, and context.$config passed to "special nuxt lifecycle areas like asyncData, fetch, plugins, middleware and nuxtServerInit" (docs).

It looks like you need to access the $config outside a component, so you'll need to retrieve it early in the request cycle. In particular, since you're mutating the Vue.prototype, this feels like a good fit for a plugin in the Nuxt sense, which isn't quite what you've got in your code.

If you put your plugin file in the plugins directory and reference it from the plugins array in nuxt.config.js (see link above for a broader example), you could rewrite it like this to access $config:

From what it looks like, options is actually an array of objects rather than just an object. So all you would need to do is map over the options variable. You are currently using Object.keys which is what you use if you are wanting to iterate over the keys in an object.

Put this at the beginning of your file:

/* eslint-disable react/display-name */

You could also try this: // eslint-disable-next-line react/display-name

You can use the FILTER function to remove the blanks.

Replace you lines load the arrays

See microsoft/TypeScript#43667 for a canonical answer. This is a design limitation of TypeScript.

As you might be aware: in TypeScript's structural type system, Child is a subtype of Base even though it is not explicitly declared as such. So every value of type Child is also a value of type Base (although not vice-versa). That means Child | Base is equivalent to Base... although the compiler is not always aggressive about reducing the former to the latter. (Compare this to the behavior with something like "foo" | string, which is always immediately reduced to string by the compiler.)

Subtype reduction is often desirable, but there are some places where Child | Base's behavior is observably different from Base's, such as excess property checks, IntelliSense hinting, or the sort of unsound type guarding that happens with the in operator. You haven't shown why it matters to you that you are getting a Base as opposed to a Child | Base, but presumably it's one of these observable differences or something like it.

My advice here is first to think carefully about whether or not you really need this distinction. If so, then you might consider preventing Base from being a subtype of Child, possibly by adding an optional property to it: