wru | Bayesian Prediction of Racial Category Using Surname

You can search the tree recursively, for example (d is your data from the question):

You could use adist. Please note that you are doing more than 1million comparisons to obtain the longest. I would prefer you use a different method. The best so far that I have in mind is

I'm not a DynamoDB insider, so I can only answer from what I understand from their documentation.

In on-demand pricing (see https://docs.aws.amazon.com/amazondynamodb/latest/developerguide/HowItWorks.ReadWriteCapacityMode.html#HowItWorks.OnDemand) you pay exactly by the number and size of your requests. If you make one million requests, you will pay the same whether these requests were to a million different partitions, or they all went to the same partition.

You might wonder, then, why there was such an issue of load imbalance pricing in provisioned-capacity pricing - or at least why is the Web full of stories of such an issue. There should never have been such an issue, but in the past there was. But since recently, this isn't an issue any more. Here is the story:

In the provisioned pricing page, Amazon claims that if you reserve 1000 WCU, you should be able to use this number of write units that you paid for, per second, and if you try to use more, you'll be throttled. There is no mention or warning of imbalanced loads or hot partitions... But people discovered that this wasn't quite true - Amazon had a bug in their throttling code: The usage counting wasn't done across the entire cluster. Instead, if your data was spread over 10 nodes, your reservation of 1000 was evenly split among them, so each of the 10 nodes would start to throttle you after 100 (1000/10) requests per second. This split worked well for well-balanced loads, but with hot partitions, it didn't work well. People were paying for a reservation of 1000 but when they measured how much they were getting, they saw throttling after just 800 (for example) requests per second. Amazon acknowledge this was a bug, and fixed it with their "adaptive capacity" technique where each of the nodes picks a different throttling limit, modified until the user's total usage approaches what he had paid for. This technique is explained in this excellent official talk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yvBR71D0nAQ - see time 19:38. Until very recently this "adaptive capacity" was a very blunt instrument, which only worked well if your workload doesn't change quickly, but since then, this issue was fixed too - as described in
https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/database/how-amazon-dynamodb-adaptive-capacity-accommodates-uneven-data-access-patterns-or-why-what-you-know-about-dynamodb-might-be-outdated/

Welcome to R. I strongly suggest you look at the the package "dplyr" with the function recode(), instead of looping, we can create a new column with a "yes" or "no" for if the ownership of the property has changed, this can allow you to pull only the rows where the ownership changed by filtering. I created a simple example for explanation.