slopegraph | Edward Tufte-Inspired Slopegraphs | Data Visualization library

Following a former question I opened few weeks ago: Slope Chart - ggplot2 I face another issue, concerning the numeric values reported in the graph. Even specifying the decimal digits I need (exactly 3) with any of the two commands:

y=round(y, digit = 3) at the endof the code

or

options(digits=3) at the beginning of the whole code

The graphical output, doesn't give me the desired number of digits but only concerning 0. In the graph, I wanted to have 0.800 (not 0.8) and 0.940 (not 0.94). It looks like it removes 0. Below the graphical output from R, I circled in red the number I intended to change.

Below the whole code:

I am testing some templates of ggplot2, and I am interesting to the slope chart, available from here:

Slope Chart - Link

It works perfectly.

I am only trying to make a similar one but with only a group defined, like the following code:

I am using OOP principles to create a bunch of graphs. Everything works fine except the setting of text values. I need to set the title of each graph but instead I am getting blank values.

My code: The controller file, i.e. main.js does all the data manipulation and creates new graphs by invoking the constructor function (stored in mainSlopeGraph.js) with arguments that include the id of

Relevant code:

I am creating a slope graph but it's being squeezed into one tiny box despite having plenty of SVG space.

Following the normal process, I created a larger canvas that holds all the elements of graph (including labels and axes etc) and then using margins, created a smaller canvas that holds ONLY the graph (no axes but incl some labels).

Then using a linear scale, I added the lines expecting it to take up all the space inside the larger canvas minus the margins.

However, instead the graph is being squeezed into a much smaller box and I cannot tell why. It's causing all the labels to overlap each other. Also, it looks awful because one of the axes is falling exactly where it should, which means it's really far away from graph.

I have tried changing various aspects of the code including expanding the range() of the linear scale but it causes only the smallest change (i.e. the lines expand a little away from each other) which is even more confusing.

I also tried commenting out all the code that moves labels around to prevent them from overlapping in case that was causing the unexpected results. But that wasn't the problem.

Clearly, something else is causing the y values to be confined to a smaller space than is apparent. I did copy this code from somewhere else so maybe I missed something when I modified it for my own use: https://gist.github.com/mwburke/9873c09ac6c21d6ac9153e54892cf5ec

My own code: