tidybayes | Bayesian analysis + tidy data + geoms | Data Visualization library
kandi X-RAY | tidybayes Summary
kandi X-RAY | tidybayes Summary
tidybayes is an R package that aims to make it easy to integrate popular Bayesian modeling methods into a tidy data + ggplot workflow. It builds on top of (and re-exports) several functions for visualizing uncertainty from its sister package, ggdist.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of tidybayes
tidybayes Key Features
tidybayes Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on tidybayes
QUESTION
I have a dataset from participants that provided liking ratings (on a scale from 0-100) of stimuli associated with rewards of different magnitudes (factor pval, with levels small/medium/large) and delay (factor time, with levels delayed/immediate). A subset of the data looks like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-14 at 22:54Regarding the first question: As is true of most summary
methods, the returned object is just a summary, and it doesn't contain the information to convert it back to an object like the one that was summarized. However, the original emmGrid
object does have all the needed content.
The other barrier is trying to work from the contrasts you don't want rather than getting the ones you do want. It is usually best to do the means and contrasts in two separate steps. It is quite simple to do:
QUESTION
I am using the Howell1 dataset from rethinking package.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jan-21 at 11:38It turned out that the discrepancy was arising due to seed setting not being honored by brms::posterior_predict
Upon discussing with developer of brms package in github, he root caused the issue to be the following:
If you have set options(mc.cores = ), posterior_predict will evaluate in parallel by default, unless you change the core argument. On windows, parallel execution is done via parallel::parLapply and I don't know how that function respects seeds, if at all. When executing the code in serial (with 1 core) the results are reproducible.
Once I set the mc.cores to 1, I no longer see the discrepancy between posterior_predict and add_predicted_draws.
Hence I am marking the issue as resolved.
The relevant github links are:
QUESTION
I ran a bayesian linear mixed model with brms and can plot the estimates nicely but I can't figure out how to order the single-subject estimates based on the mean of the posterior samples (so as to get a caterpillar plot). This is what I've done.
Toy data:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Sep-10 at 02:52Two points for consideration:
- Ungroup the result from
spread_draws
, otherwise you won't be able to reorder the levels ofsubject
; - Use
fct_reorder
from theforcats
package in tidyverse. It's designed for this exact purpose.
QUESTION
I ran some multilevel models using brms
and am following the examples here to plot draws from the posterior for each parameter.
Here's a toy dataset to reproduce the problem
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Aug-28 at 02:53Your plot looks fine and gives me the following output. I am running R 4.0.2 and RStudio version 1.2.5 on windows. However, my output looks like yours if I expand it horizontally.
QUESTION
How could I pass the variable name typical_r
to tidybayes::spread_draws()
programmatically? In my use case typical_r
comes in as a string, but I can't pass a string to tidybayes::spread_draws()
.
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jan-18 at 19:49Use !!sym()
to convert from string into a symbol
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install tidybayes
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page