monotime | A sensible interface to monotonic time in Ruby
kandi X-RAY | monotime Summary
kandi X-RAY | monotime Summary
A sensible interface to Ruby's monotonic clock, inspired by Rust.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Returns a string representation of a number .
- Creates a new Time object .
- sleep the given duration
- Creates a new Time object .
- sleep for seconds
- Returns the value as milliseconds .
- Skip the given seconds .
- Sleep for the given amount .
- Creates a new Time object .
- The elapsed time .
monotime Key Features
monotime Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on monotime
QUESTION
I tried to call the isSpaceAscii
from the standard library but got worse performance than with my own proc.
Code to reproduce:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-10 at 19:58Benchmarking is hard, because you're not always measuring what you think you're measuring.
The incredibly stark differences you're seeing are because the isSpace
loop doesn't do anything, and is in the same compilation unit as the isSpace
function, so the compiler can optimize it away
as you can see on godbolt
if you instead compile with -d:release -d:lto
the compiler will perform link-time optimization, and will optimize away both versions.
QUESTION
I use this function to init logging with boost and it works well
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jul-29 at 16:26Boost offers a monotonic clock boost::log::detail::get_timestamp()
It's a bit misleading to say it "offers" that. It's expressly in a detail namespace so you cannot rely on it.
Is it monotonic?It turns out that on POSIX the implementation is switched anyways:
QUESTION
Say I have an iterable array of objects and I want to loop over each of those objects and perform some task or tasks. I see two ways of doing this, which are listed below. I have timed both using MonoTime and they seem to be comparable as far as execution time goes.
Which of these options is recommended for use in D? And in what scenarios might the recommended option not be useful for?
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Sep-10 at 02:24foreach
is the default.
The one thing I'd use each
for is applying a lot of transforms to a collection (with std.algorithm) and then iterating over the result. This is for readability alone. Consider if you wanted to iterate over the following:
QUESTION
Windows 7 x64, Python 2.7 (Anaconda distribution), cx_Freeze 5.0
I am having trouble converting my python script to an executable using cx freeze. I can create an exe using the setup file below (with no errors mentioned) although in when building there are lots of missing modules with a “?” next to it – I'm not sure if this is important or not.
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Jan-16 at 16:21Well in the end I uninstalled and reinstalled Anaconda. This seemed to do the trick as now cx_freeze builds an exe which works fine. Not sure what happened to my previous install of Anaconda.
Hope this helps someone as it drove me up the wall!
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install monotime
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page