cashier | Tag based caching for Rails using Redis | Caching library

Try:

To concatenate in PHP, use the dot operator ., not +

Change the line

$signup_employee_id = 'GTE' + (string)$rand;

to

$signup_employee_id = 'GTE' . (string)$rand;

You can try with 2 merge con the 2 different Titles subsequentely.

For example, let be

• df1 : job_transitions_sample.csv

• df2 : wage_data_sample.csv

  df1.merge(df2, left_on='Title 1', right_on='title',suffixes=('', 'Wage of')).merge(df2, left_on='Title 2', right_on='title',suffixes=('', 'Wage of'))

every() method in JavaScript is used to checks whether all the elements of the array satisfy the given condition or not. The Array. some() method in JavaScript is used to check whether at least one of the elements of the array satisfies the given condition or not.
For your issue:

I have found the answer of my Question.Just pass the product id in array like this,

If you want to find the average number of borrowed books from all occupations, then use:

You can achieve your first scenario by setting backdate_start_date to 2022-01-01 and billing_cycle_anchor to 2023-01-01.

As you note, Stripe does not allow billing periods of longer than 12 months but there are some workarounds for it.

One option is to create a subscription with a year+ long trial but with a one time charge of the subscription's yearly fee. To do this when creating the subscription you would backdate the start date to 2022-01-01, set a trial_end and billing_cycle_anchor of 2024-01-01, and use the add_invoice_items[1] parameter to create a one time charge with the same amount as your yearly fee.

Alternatively you can create a subscription schedule[2] with a first phase that ends 2023-01-01, a trial phase that lasts a year, and then a phase with your year-long price.

[1] https://stripe.com/docs/api/subscriptions/create#create_subscription-add_invoice_items

[2] https://stripe.com/docs/billing/subscriptions/subscription-schedules

I found solution, parameters of url/route were not matching with the controller function. See login function:

Before

To answer your questions...

Does that mean any Solana program can transfer any user's tokens without their consent?

That would be quite a security flaw! The concept is that, when you transfer tokens, some account must sign to validate the transfer. That account may be the owner, or some pre-approved delegate. In the exsample that you've shown, authority is given as ctx.accounts.owner.clone(), which means that the owner has likely already signed the transaction. If the owner approves some amount to a delegate, and then signs with that delegate, the token program figures out that the delegate has signed, and allows the transfer.

Why does the approve function exist if we cannot check the allowance?

To check the allowance, you'll have to deserialize the account into a token Account https://docs.rs/anchor-spl/0.19.0/anchor_spl/token/struct.TokenAccount.html. You can use one of the helpers, like try_deserialize, which gives you a type that wraps spl_token::state::Account.

With your spl_token::state::Account, you can check the delegated_amount field to see how much has been approved by the user: https://github.com/solana-labs/solana-program-library/blob/8eb2c3ce60bfe943e277eb172ba8e9ce9b6bdae6/token/program/src/state.rs#L103