tedium | Simplify form filling with SitePrism

I'm trying to do my first Windows app with C++ and I'm really struggling with how to implement event handlers. I'm reading through the Win32 documentation, but it's really sparse on examples. Unfortunately, I can't seem to find much on YouTube or other written sources for much beyond making the first window.

The basic idea of my app is to have it change the refresh rate of the display based on whether or not the charger for a laptop is plugged in. This is mostly for personal use since my laptop supports 144Hz and 60Hz, and I want to take advantage of the higher rate when plugged in, but get the benefits of better battery life when unplugged (without the tedium of going through the display settings every time I plug in/unplug).

My background is primarily in Android development, but this all seems a bit more daunting than that. I've come across these links:

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/microsoft.win32.systemevents.powermodechanged?redirectedfrom=MSDN&view=dotnet-plat-ext-3.1

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/microsoft.win32.powermodechangedeventhandler?view=dotnet-plat-ext-3.1

How to detect when laptop power cable has been disconnected?

These seem to be what I'm looking for, but I haven't the slightest idea of how to actually put this together in the context of my app, though it seems like I might really want to use PowerModeChangedEventHandler. Here's what I've gotten so far (a lot of copy/paste work with modifications):

I am trying to write a function in R that uses a "key-value" data.frame of quantile breakpoints to return a weight based on the quantile that an input value falls into. Here is an example of one of these data.frames:

I am new to Blazor with basic Angular and Vue.js experience. I would like to render a list of polymorphic components:

Recently, I had to write an After Effects plugin which had 110 "parameters". Each of these parameters had to be declared by three sort of functions: Creation, Check in, and Check out:

I'm looking for an elegant solution—if there is one—to the problem of linking to an out-of-project shared assembly attributes file and then pushing that project to TFS for a build.

I'm in the process of converting all of my local solutions and projects to source control (it's been a long time coming) and publishing the shared code as NuGet packages. My new design enforces one solution per package, with each solution containing one main project and one test project. In other words, one working assembly per solution.

Previously, when working from my local machine only, I'd reference several of these 'library' projects in a given solution, so the linked shared file solution worked well, e.g. . Consistency among these attributes is very important, for registry key naming, etc.

But now sending these projects to the build server presents a problem; the linked file doesn't exist on the server and so the build naturally fails.

I'm trying to avoid the tedium and human error that comes with manually editing the AssemblyInfo.vb file for each and every new project I create. Linking was perfect, but it now no longer works. (The code also needs to run locally during dev, so tuning it up in a build step isn't an option.)

I'm rather new to source control and build architectures; what are good folks out there doing to address this issue?

I'm writing unit tests for some function macros, which are just wrappers around some function calls, with a little housekeeping thrown in.

I've been writing tests all morning and I'm starting to get tedium of the brainpan, so this might just be a case of tunnel vision, but:

Is there a valid case to be made for unit testing for macro expansion? By that I mean checking that the correct function behavior is produced for the various source code forms of the function macro's arguments. For example, function arguments can take the form, in source code of a:

• literal
• variable
• operator expression
• struct member access
• pointer-to-struct member access
• pointer dereference
• array index
• function call
• macro expansion
• (feel free to point out any that I've missed)

If the macro doesn't expand properly, then the code usually won't even compile. So then, is there even any sensible point in a different unit test if the argument was a float literal or a float variable, or the result of a function call?

Should the expansion be part of the unit test?

I am hoping someone can help me out of this tedium...!?

As the title suggests I have a Temp Table (create dynamically in a select statement):

I'm trying to create named JArrays using JSON.net. I have a list of food, like Milk in the example below.

On initial writing of this data, all food items in the List (say List()) have an array created for each food item, as child arrays in the Items array.

Then later on, when adding a food JObject, I add it to the appropriate sub-array.

The problem is creating the sub-arrays for each item in my list. Maybe it's due to it being 5am, but I just can't seem to figure it out.

PS: I know I could create an example class like the Items class below, however.. I'm trying to do this dynamically. I have a list of data that I can pull the entire food list from (in string format), so it would save hours of tedium if I could do this via the List I have for the food items.

Any help is appreciated. Thank you