memoizable | Memoize method return values | Runtime Evironment library
kandi X-RAY | memoizable Summary
kandi X-RAY | memoizable Summary
Memoize method return values.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Create a new memoized method
- Fetch a value from the cache
- Store a value in memory
- Memoize a method
- Determines if the method is visible
- Returns the required array of required parameters
- Gets optional arguments .
- Called when an argument is missing
memoizable Key Features
memoizable Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on memoizable
QUESTION
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Oct-29 at 12:24Turns out the solution was to declare Memoized
as follows:
QUESTION
I'm looking for a way to cache properties of an object. In my case, I suppose the object can change over the time, so the memoized value for the property should be flushable. In pure python, I want to have a behaviour like:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Oct-20 at 09:47Thanks to @sanyash discussion on question comments.
There is a cached_property
package (https://pypi.org/project/cached-property/) that provides the requested behaviour. The example using cached_property
is as follows:
QUESTION
I postes this question because I didn't find any related answer on stackoverflow. I did everything. I will explain what I have tried.
When I start the Rails server using rails s
, I get the following output:
ANSWER
Answered 2019-Jul-03 at 12:33The root of the problem seems to be bundler. What operating system and Ruby version are you using? It may be a problem with old OpenSSL library, so you can not install bundler and everything after it.
If you are using jRuby (your gem list
output tells so), your problem seems to be the same as described in link. And there is a solution as well.
Maybe you forgot to set 2.1.2
version of ruby as global? (rbenv set global 2.1.2
)
QUESTION
I'm trying to create a "reactive and memoizable" version of an existing function by leveraging functions from shiny
- but for usage outside of a shiny context.
The cool thing about relying on shiny::reactive()
is that
- it "automagically" knows about its reactive dependencies
- it handles the decision "return cache or re-execute underlying expresssion" for us
While my approach of handing the function's body (instead of the function itself) to shiny::reactive()
works per se, it makes me give up things that only work for functions such as missing()
or match.arg()
.
But I can't seem to find a way of handing the function itself to shiny::reactive()
while still making use of its built-in caching/memoization. To see this, note that foo()
is actually executed each time we call foo_react()
and thus no caching comes into play in the second approach
ANSWER
Answered 2019-Jan-24 at 02:59Sorry for not quite understanding the rlang stuff. But could you just call the foo()
function in a reactive expression, wrapping it in a function to pass args if needed? I tried tweaking approach 2 like this:
QUESTION
Here's my code for a concurrent cache:
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-May-08 at 04:44maps require synchronization, in particular you can not read it while writing to it, regardless of if it's the same or distinct keys, so you need your lock around the meno map.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install memoizable
On a UNIX-like operating system, using your system’s package manager is easiest. However, the packaged Ruby version may not be the newest one. There is also an installer for Windows. Managers help you to switch between multiple Ruby versions on your system. Installers can be used to install a specific or multiple Ruby versions. Please refer ruby-lang.org for more information.
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page