interfaceable | Strict interfaces in Ruby

by featurist Ruby Version: Current License: MIT

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(2)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | interfaceable Summary

interfaceable is a Ruby library. interfaceable has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

Impose interfaces on classes and let this gem automatically check that the interface constraints are met.

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

interfaceable has a low active ecosystem.

It has 91 star(s) with 2 fork(s). There are 2 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 6 months.

interfaceable has no issues reported. There are no pull requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of interfaceable is current.

Quality

interfaceable has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

Security

interfaceable has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

interfaceable code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.

There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

License

interfaceable is licensed under the MIT License. This license is Permissive.

Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

Reuse

interfaceable releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.

Installation instructions, examples and code snippets are available.

interfaceable saves you 147 person hours of effort in developing the same functionality from scratch.

It has 368 lines of code, 33 functions and 8 files.

It has medium code complexity. Code complexity directly impacts maintainability of the code.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi has reviewed interfaceable and discovered the below as its top functions. This is intended to give you an instant insight into interfaceable implemented functionality, and help decide if they suit your requirements.

Validate methods
Checks the parameters for the given method signature .
Formats an error message
Checks the method signature for the given method and signature .
Turns a parameter into a list of parameters .
Formats and returns error message
Formats parameter key
Runs all interfaces in the specified interface .
Returns all missing methods
Returns a list of warnings based on the error signature

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

interfaceable Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for interfaceable.

interfaceable Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for interfaceable.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on interfaceable

Using interface realization thru generic class

Calling FORTRAN subroutine from c++ yields illegal parameter value

QUESTION

Using interface realization thru generic class

Asked 2017-Nov-14 at 09:00

I try to use a interface realization through a generic class. Wondering on some abstraction magic, but get compiler errors with this approach.

...

ANSWER

Answered 2017-Nov-14 at 08:56

This works and I'll add an explanation why at the bottom:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/47281130

QUESTION

Calling FORTRAN subroutine from c++ yields illegal parameter value

Asked 2017-Feb-26 at 10:51

I'm currently trying to solve a particular eigenvalue problem (so-called gyroscopic eigenvalue problem) with large, sparse matrices (from FEM dsicretization). The programming language is C++.

The standard reference for EVP is ARPACK. Alas, it implements only "classical" Arnoldi processes, which is not suited for such problems (c.f. Structure Preserving Methods).

Recently I've found this Algorithm 961 reference, which also provides some code - in FORTRAN! So i've tried to include the DGHUTR routine in C++, to no avail. Below is the MWE, which is an adaptation of the test for DGHUTR (TDGHUTR.f) in C++:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2017-Feb-26 at 10:51

I think I have found the source of the problem which has been plaguing me. The dependence of the values received by the fortran routine on the optimization flags was kind of a hint that there might be something wrong with how the stored variables are interpreted by C++ and FORTRAN. After looking for the specific value of 17179869188 and finding this SO post I tried playing with the compiler flags for the libraries.

When I fetched SLICOT I took the source and a library precompiled with gfortran for linux (slicot_linux_gfortran.tar.gz). This latter one came with a make.inc with OPTS = -O2 -fpic -fdefault-integer-8 The SHHEVP routines contained the following comment in the make.inc

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/42412509

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install interfaceable

Add this line to your application's Gemfile:.

Support

For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .

Find more information at: